Do Foreign Occupations Cause Suicide Attacks?

Simon Collard-Wexler, Costantino Pischedda, Michael G. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The phenomenon of suicide attacks has dramatically expanded over the last twenty years, rising from no events in 1980 to a total of 1,398 events by 2008. A prominent theory has argued that suicide attacks are a coercive strategy aimed at ending foreign military occupation by democracies. Yet these conclusions are based on a research design that is affected by selection bias and that fails to distinguish foreign occupations from cases of groups seeking independence or autonomy, which we term domestic occupations. Analyzing an original data set that distinguishes the different types of occupation, we find that only foreign occupations have a strong and consistent effect on the incidence of suicide attacks. The reason, we argue, is that suicide attacks only become cost effective when targets are both hardened and accessible, a strategic environment that is more common to civil wars and foreign occupations than to domestic occupations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)625-657
Number of pages33
JournalJournal of Conflict Resolution
Volume58
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

suicide
occupation
cause
event
civil war
research planning
incidence
autonomy
Military
democracy
Suicide
Attack
trend
costs
Group

Keywords

  • foreign occupation
  • insurgency
  • suicide attacks
  • terrorism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

Do Foreign Occupations Cause Suicide Attacks? / Collard-Wexler, Simon; Pischedda, Costantino; Smith, Michael G.

In: Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 58, No. 4, 2014, p. 625-657.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Collard-Wexler, Simon ; Pischedda, Costantino ; Smith, Michael G. / Do Foreign Occupations Cause Suicide Attacks?. In: Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2014 ; Vol. 58, No. 4. pp. 625-657.
@article{6a32e0c9c4924fe3843ad5815bbf992d,
title = "Do Foreign Occupations Cause Suicide Attacks?",
abstract = "The phenomenon of suicide attacks has dramatically expanded over the last twenty years, rising from no events in 1980 to a total of 1,398 events by 2008. A prominent theory has argued that suicide attacks are a coercive strategy aimed at ending foreign military occupation by democracies. Yet these conclusions are based on a research design that is affected by selection bias and that fails to distinguish foreign occupations from cases of groups seeking independence or autonomy, which we term domestic occupations. Analyzing an original data set that distinguishes the different types of occupation, we find that only foreign occupations have a strong and consistent effect on the incidence of suicide attacks. The reason, we argue, is that suicide attacks only become cost effective when targets are both hardened and accessible, a strategic environment that is more common to civil wars and foreign occupations than to domestic occupations.",
keywords = "foreign occupation, insurgency, suicide attacks, terrorism",
author = "Simon Collard-Wexler and Costantino Pischedda and Smith, {Michael G.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1177/0022002713478558",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "625--657",
journal = "Journal of Conflict Resolution",
issn = "0022-0027",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do Foreign Occupations Cause Suicide Attacks?

AU - Collard-Wexler, Simon

AU - Pischedda, Costantino

AU - Smith, Michael G.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The phenomenon of suicide attacks has dramatically expanded over the last twenty years, rising from no events in 1980 to a total of 1,398 events by 2008. A prominent theory has argued that suicide attacks are a coercive strategy aimed at ending foreign military occupation by democracies. Yet these conclusions are based on a research design that is affected by selection bias and that fails to distinguish foreign occupations from cases of groups seeking independence or autonomy, which we term domestic occupations. Analyzing an original data set that distinguishes the different types of occupation, we find that only foreign occupations have a strong and consistent effect on the incidence of suicide attacks. The reason, we argue, is that suicide attacks only become cost effective when targets are both hardened and accessible, a strategic environment that is more common to civil wars and foreign occupations than to domestic occupations.

AB - The phenomenon of suicide attacks has dramatically expanded over the last twenty years, rising from no events in 1980 to a total of 1,398 events by 2008. A prominent theory has argued that suicide attacks are a coercive strategy aimed at ending foreign military occupation by democracies. Yet these conclusions are based on a research design that is affected by selection bias and that fails to distinguish foreign occupations from cases of groups seeking independence or autonomy, which we term domestic occupations. Analyzing an original data set that distinguishes the different types of occupation, we find that only foreign occupations have a strong and consistent effect on the incidence of suicide attacks. The reason, we argue, is that suicide attacks only become cost effective when targets are both hardened and accessible, a strategic environment that is more common to civil wars and foreign occupations than to domestic occupations.

KW - foreign occupation

KW - insurgency

KW - suicide attacks

KW - terrorism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901052610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901052610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022002713478558

DO - 10.1177/0022002713478558

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 625

EP - 657

JO - Journal of Conflict Resolution

JF - Journal of Conflict Resolution

SN - 0022-0027

IS - 4

ER -