Do ecological niche models accurately identify climatic determinants of species ranges?

Christopher Searcy, H. Bradley Shaffer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Defining species’ niches is central to understanding their distributions and is thus fundamental to basic ecology and climate change projections. Ecological niche models (ENMs) are a key component of making accurate projections and include descriptions of the niche in terms ofboth response curves and rankings ofvariable importance. In this study, we evaluate Maxent's ranking of environmental variables based on their importance in delimiting species' range boundaries by asking whether these same variables also govern annual recruitment based on long-term demographic studies. We found that Maxent-based assessments of variable importance in setting range boundaries in the California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense; CTS) correlate very well with how important those variables are in governing ongoing recruitment of CTS at the population level. This strong correlation suggests that Maxent's ranking of variable importance captures biologically realistic assessments of factors governing population persistence. However, this result holds only when Maxent models are built using best-practice procedures and variables are ranked based on permutation importance. Our study highlights the need for building high-quality niche models and provides encouraging evidence that when such models are built, they can reflect important aspects of a species’ ecology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)423-435
Number of pages13
JournalAmerican Naturalist
Volume187
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

niches
ranking
niche
ecology
demographic statistics
persistence
climate change
environmental factors
ecological niche
Ambystoma californiense

Keywords

  • Ambystoma californiense
  • Maxent
  • Percent contribution
  • Permutation importance
  • Recruitment
  • Salamander demography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Do ecological niche models accurately identify climatic determinants of species ranges? / Searcy, Christopher; Bradley Shaffer, H.

In: American Naturalist, Vol. 187, No. 4, 01.04.2016, p. 423-435.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0af1a774e1f24bc0b4faf6a7edee1f79,
title = "Do ecological niche models accurately identify climatic determinants of species ranges?",
abstract = "Defining species’ niches is central to understanding their distributions and is thus fundamental to basic ecology and climate change projections. Ecological niche models (ENMs) are a key component of making accurate projections and include descriptions of the niche in terms ofboth response curves and rankings ofvariable importance. In this study, we evaluate Maxent's ranking of environmental variables based on their importance in delimiting species' range boundaries by asking whether these same variables also govern annual recruitment based on long-term demographic studies. We found that Maxent-based assessments of variable importance in setting range boundaries in the California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense; CTS) correlate very well with how important those variables are in governing ongoing recruitment of CTS at the population level. This strong correlation suggests that Maxent's ranking of variable importance captures biologically realistic assessments of factors governing population persistence. However, this result holds only when Maxent models are built using best-practice procedures and variables are ranked based on permutation importance. Our study highlights the need for building high-quality niche models and provides encouraging evidence that when such models are built, they can reflect important aspects of a species’ ecology.",
keywords = "Ambystoma californiense, Maxent, Percent contribution, Permutation importance, Recruitment, Salamander demography",
author = "Christopher Searcy and {Bradley Shaffer}, H.",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/685387",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "187",
pages = "423--435",
journal = "American Naturalist",
issn = "0003-0147",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do ecological niche models accurately identify climatic determinants of species ranges?

AU - Searcy, Christopher

AU - Bradley Shaffer, H.

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Defining species’ niches is central to understanding their distributions and is thus fundamental to basic ecology and climate change projections. Ecological niche models (ENMs) are a key component of making accurate projections and include descriptions of the niche in terms ofboth response curves and rankings ofvariable importance. In this study, we evaluate Maxent's ranking of environmental variables based on their importance in delimiting species' range boundaries by asking whether these same variables also govern annual recruitment based on long-term demographic studies. We found that Maxent-based assessments of variable importance in setting range boundaries in the California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense; CTS) correlate very well with how important those variables are in governing ongoing recruitment of CTS at the population level. This strong correlation suggests that Maxent's ranking of variable importance captures biologically realistic assessments of factors governing population persistence. However, this result holds only when Maxent models are built using best-practice procedures and variables are ranked based on permutation importance. Our study highlights the need for building high-quality niche models and provides encouraging evidence that when such models are built, they can reflect important aspects of a species’ ecology.

AB - Defining species’ niches is central to understanding their distributions and is thus fundamental to basic ecology and climate change projections. Ecological niche models (ENMs) are a key component of making accurate projections and include descriptions of the niche in terms ofboth response curves and rankings ofvariable importance. In this study, we evaluate Maxent's ranking of environmental variables based on their importance in delimiting species' range boundaries by asking whether these same variables also govern annual recruitment based on long-term demographic studies. We found that Maxent-based assessments of variable importance in setting range boundaries in the California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense; CTS) correlate very well with how important those variables are in governing ongoing recruitment of CTS at the population level. This strong correlation suggests that Maxent's ranking of variable importance captures biologically realistic assessments of factors governing population persistence. However, this result holds only when Maxent models are built using best-practice procedures and variables are ranked based on permutation importance. Our study highlights the need for building high-quality niche models and provides encouraging evidence that when such models are built, they can reflect important aspects of a species’ ecology.

KW - Ambystoma californiense

KW - Maxent

KW - Percent contribution

KW - Permutation importance

KW - Recruitment

KW - Salamander demography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962425689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962425689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/685387

DO - 10.1086/685387

M3 - Article

C2 - 27028071

AN - SCOPUS:84962425689

VL - 187

SP - 423

EP - 435

JO - American Naturalist

JF - American Naturalist

SN - 0003-0147

IS - 4

ER -