Divergence in student and educator conceptual structures during auscultation training

Ryan Brydges, Adam Peets, Barry Issenberg, Glenn Regehr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context Simulation-based medical education allows trainees to engage in self-regulated learning (SRL), yet research aimed at elucidating the mechanisms of SRL in this context is relatively absent. We compared 'unguided' SRL with 'directed' SRL (DSRL), wherein learners followed an expert-designed booklet. Methods Year1 medical students (n=37) were randomly assigned to practise identifying seven cardiac murmurs using a simulator and video only (SRL group) or a simulator and video plus the booklet (DSRL group). All participants completed a 22-item test 3weeks later. To compare interventions, we analysed students' diagnostic accuracy. As a novel source of evidence, we documented how participants autonomously sequenced the seven murmurs during initial and delayed practice sessions. In addition, we surveyed clinical educators (n=17) to find out how they would sequence their teaching of these murmurs. Results The DSRL group used 50% more training time than the SRL group (p<0.001). The groups' diagnostic accuracy, however, did not differ significantly on the post-test, retention test or transfer test items (p>0.12). Despite practising with the expert-defined 'timing-based' approach to murmur diagnosis (i.e. systolic versus diastolic), 84% of DSRL participants implemented a location-based approach (i.e. practising aortic murmurs separately from mitral murmurs) during a second, unguided practice session. Notably, most SRL participants used that same approach spontaneously. By contrast, clinical educators were split in their use of the timing-based (n=10) and the location-based (n=6) approaches. Chi-squared analyses suggested educators' conceptions for organising murmurs differed significantly from students' conceptions. Conclusions Contrary to our predictions, directing students' SRL produced no additional benefit and increased their practice time. Our findings suggest one potential source of these results was a divergence between student and educator conceptions for structuring the practice of cardiac auscultation skills. This phenomenon has not been well articulated in the medical education literature, and may have important implications in many (especially technology-mediated) educational contexts. Discuss ideas arising from this article at 'discuss'

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)198-209
Number of pages12
JournalMedical Education
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2013

Fingerprint

Auscultation
divergence
Learning
educator
Students
learning
student
Pamphlets
Medical Education
Heart Auscultation
Group
video
Educational Technology
expert
Heart Murmurs
Medical Students
trainee
medical student
education
Teaching

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Divergence in student and educator conceptual structures during auscultation training. / Brydges, Ryan; Peets, Adam; Issenberg, Barry; Regehr, Glenn.

In: Medical Education, Vol. 47, No. 2, 01.02.2013, p. 198-209.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brydges, Ryan ; Peets, Adam ; Issenberg, Barry ; Regehr, Glenn. / Divergence in student and educator conceptual structures during auscultation training. In: Medical Education. 2013 ; Vol. 47, No. 2. pp. 198-209.
@article{b9ac20ec76a04957b49ee0782369c219,
title = "Divergence in student and educator conceptual structures during auscultation training",
abstract = "Context Simulation-based medical education allows trainees to engage in self-regulated learning (SRL), yet research aimed at elucidating the mechanisms of SRL in this context is relatively absent. We compared 'unguided' SRL with 'directed' SRL (DSRL), wherein learners followed an expert-designed booklet. Methods Year1 medical students (n=37) were randomly assigned to practise identifying seven cardiac murmurs using a simulator and video only (SRL group) or a simulator and video plus the booklet (DSRL group). All participants completed a 22-item test 3weeks later. To compare interventions, we analysed students' diagnostic accuracy. As a novel source of evidence, we documented how participants autonomously sequenced the seven murmurs during initial and delayed practice sessions. In addition, we surveyed clinical educators (n=17) to find out how they would sequence their teaching of these murmurs. Results The DSRL group used 50{\%} more training time than the SRL group (p<0.001). The groups' diagnostic accuracy, however, did not differ significantly on the post-test, retention test or transfer test items (p>0.12). Despite practising with the expert-defined 'timing-based' approach to murmur diagnosis (i.e. systolic versus diastolic), 84{\%} of DSRL participants implemented a location-based approach (i.e. practising aortic murmurs separately from mitral murmurs) during a second, unguided practice session. Notably, most SRL participants used that same approach spontaneously. By contrast, clinical educators were split in their use of the timing-based (n=10) and the location-based (n=6) approaches. Chi-squared analyses suggested educators' conceptions for organising murmurs differed significantly from students' conceptions. Conclusions Contrary to our predictions, directing students' SRL produced no additional benefit and increased their practice time. Our findings suggest one potential source of these results was a divergence between student and educator conceptions for structuring the practice of cardiac auscultation skills. This phenomenon has not been well articulated in the medical education literature, and may have important implications in many (especially technology-mediated) educational contexts. Discuss ideas arising from this article at 'discuss'",
author = "Ryan Brydges and Adam Peets and Barry Issenberg and Glenn Regehr",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/medu.12088",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "198--209",
journal = "Medical Education",
issn = "0308-0110",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Divergence in student and educator conceptual structures during auscultation training

AU - Brydges, Ryan

AU - Peets, Adam

AU - Issenberg, Barry

AU - Regehr, Glenn

PY - 2013/2/1

Y1 - 2013/2/1

N2 - Context Simulation-based medical education allows trainees to engage in self-regulated learning (SRL), yet research aimed at elucidating the mechanisms of SRL in this context is relatively absent. We compared 'unguided' SRL with 'directed' SRL (DSRL), wherein learners followed an expert-designed booklet. Methods Year1 medical students (n=37) were randomly assigned to practise identifying seven cardiac murmurs using a simulator and video only (SRL group) or a simulator and video plus the booklet (DSRL group). All participants completed a 22-item test 3weeks later. To compare interventions, we analysed students' diagnostic accuracy. As a novel source of evidence, we documented how participants autonomously sequenced the seven murmurs during initial and delayed practice sessions. In addition, we surveyed clinical educators (n=17) to find out how they would sequence their teaching of these murmurs. Results The DSRL group used 50% more training time than the SRL group (p<0.001). The groups' diagnostic accuracy, however, did not differ significantly on the post-test, retention test or transfer test items (p>0.12). Despite practising with the expert-defined 'timing-based' approach to murmur diagnosis (i.e. systolic versus diastolic), 84% of DSRL participants implemented a location-based approach (i.e. practising aortic murmurs separately from mitral murmurs) during a second, unguided practice session. Notably, most SRL participants used that same approach spontaneously. By contrast, clinical educators were split in their use of the timing-based (n=10) and the location-based (n=6) approaches. Chi-squared analyses suggested educators' conceptions for organising murmurs differed significantly from students' conceptions. Conclusions Contrary to our predictions, directing students' SRL produced no additional benefit and increased their practice time. Our findings suggest one potential source of these results was a divergence between student and educator conceptions for structuring the practice of cardiac auscultation skills. This phenomenon has not been well articulated in the medical education literature, and may have important implications in many (especially technology-mediated) educational contexts. Discuss ideas arising from this article at 'discuss'

AB - Context Simulation-based medical education allows trainees to engage in self-regulated learning (SRL), yet research aimed at elucidating the mechanisms of SRL in this context is relatively absent. We compared 'unguided' SRL with 'directed' SRL (DSRL), wherein learners followed an expert-designed booklet. Methods Year1 medical students (n=37) were randomly assigned to practise identifying seven cardiac murmurs using a simulator and video only (SRL group) or a simulator and video plus the booklet (DSRL group). All participants completed a 22-item test 3weeks later. To compare interventions, we analysed students' diagnostic accuracy. As a novel source of evidence, we documented how participants autonomously sequenced the seven murmurs during initial and delayed practice sessions. In addition, we surveyed clinical educators (n=17) to find out how they would sequence their teaching of these murmurs. Results The DSRL group used 50% more training time than the SRL group (p<0.001). The groups' diagnostic accuracy, however, did not differ significantly on the post-test, retention test or transfer test items (p>0.12). Despite practising with the expert-defined 'timing-based' approach to murmur diagnosis (i.e. systolic versus diastolic), 84% of DSRL participants implemented a location-based approach (i.e. practising aortic murmurs separately from mitral murmurs) during a second, unguided practice session. Notably, most SRL participants used that same approach spontaneously. By contrast, clinical educators were split in their use of the timing-based (n=10) and the location-based (n=6) approaches. Chi-squared analyses suggested educators' conceptions for organising murmurs differed significantly from students' conceptions. Conclusions Contrary to our predictions, directing students' SRL produced no additional benefit and increased their practice time. Our findings suggest one potential source of these results was a divergence between student and educator conceptions for structuring the practice of cardiac auscultation skills. This phenomenon has not been well articulated in the medical education literature, and may have important implications in many (especially technology-mediated) educational contexts. Discuss ideas arising from this article at 'discuss'

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872553436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872553436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/medu.12088

DO - 10.1111/medu.12088

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 198

EP - 209

JO - Medical Education

JF - Medical Education

SN - 0308-0110

IS - 2

ER -