Disposal management of preservative-treated wood products

Timothy Townsend, Brajesh Dubey, Helena M Solo-Gabriele

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

When treated wood structures reach the end of their useful lifespan they must be disposed of. Proper management of the preservative-containing wood is necessary to minimize any potential risk to human health and the environment. Treated wood products enter the waste stream in small amounts as remnants during construction activities, and at a much larger magnitude as a result of demolition. The first step in discarded treated wood management is determination of appropriate regulatory status, i.e. is should the waste be managed as a hazardous waste. Testing finds that creosote and pentachlorophenol treated wood do not typically leach preservative concentrations at sufficient quantities to be characterized as a hazardous waste in the US. Chromated copper arsenate (CCA) treated wood does often leach arsenic (As) and chromium (Cr) above hazardous waste thresholds, but in most of the US, CCA-treated wood is excluded from being defined as a hazardous waste because of a specific exemption under resource conservation and recovery act (RCRA). Other national or state specific regulations may impact disposal-end management requirements. The primary management options for discarded treated wood include landfilling, combustion and recycling. Landfilling is typically the least expensive option, but this practice is accompanied by concerns such as placement and compaction difficulties and the potential for contamination of leachate and groundwater. Recent research suggests that As leaching may pose a risk to groundwater at unlined C&D debris landfills and leachate management problems at a lined facility. Combustion is commonly practiced to recover energy from creosote and pentachlorophenol treated wood. Arsenic from CCA-treated wood may volatilizes at typical combustion temperatures so combustion facilities should be equipped with appropriate air pollution control devices. Recycling practices and extraction technologies such as bioremediation, chemical extraction, electrodialytic extraction and liquefaction have been developed, but these systems are more costly than traditional disposal options and separation of treated wood from the mixed wood stream can be challenging. As alternative treated wood products are developed and used, manufacturers should consider disposal-end management.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationACS Symposium Series
PublisherAmerican Chemical Society
Pages545-562
Number of pages18
Volume982
ISBN (Print)9780841239517
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2 2008

Publication series

NameACS Symposium Series
Volume982
ISSN (Print)00976156
ISSN (Electronic)19475918

Fingerprint

Wood products
Wood
Hazardous Waste
Arsenic
Creosote
Pentachlorophenol
Copper
Recycling
Groundwater
Chemical Water Pollutants
Demolition
Air pollution control
Bioremediation
Chromium
Liquefaction
Land fill
Debris
Leaching
Conservation
Compaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Chemical Engineering(all)

Cite this

Townsend, T., Dubey, B., & Solo-Gabriele, H. M. (2008). Disposal management of preservative-treated wood products. In ACS Symposium Series (Vol. 982, pp. 545-562). (ACS Symposium Series; Vol. 982). American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2008-0982.ch033

Disposal management of preservative-treated wood products. / Townsend, Timothy; Dubey, Brajesh; Solo-Gabriele, Helena M.

ACS Symposium Series. Vol. 982 American Chemical Society, 2008. p. 545-562 (ACS Symposium Series; Vol. 982).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Townsend, T, Dubey, B & Solo-Gabriele, HM 2008, Disposal management of preservative-treated wood products. in ACS Symposium Series. vol. 982, ACS Symposium Series, vol. 982, American Chemical Society, pp. 545-562. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2008-0982.ch033
Townsend T, Dubey B, Solo-Gabriele HM. Disposal management of preservative-treated wood products. In ACS Symposium Series. Vol. 982. American Chemical Society. 2008. p. 545-562. (ACS Symposium Series). https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2008-0982.ch033
Townsend, Timothy ; Dubey, Brajesh ; Solo-Gabriele, Helena M. / Disposal management of preservative-treated wood products. ACS Symposium Series. Vol. 982 American Chemical Society, 2008. pp. 545-562 (ACS Symposium Series).
@inproceedings{ba028510994048f08818fabc1b1c65d7,
title = "Disposal management of preservative-treated wood products",
abstract = "When treated wood structures reach the end of their useful lifespan they must be disposed of. Proper management of the preservative-containing wood is necessary to minimize any potential risk to human health and the environment. Treated wood products enter the waste stream in small amounts as remnants during construction activities, and at a much larger magnitude as a result of demolition. The first step in discarded treated wood management is determination of appropriate regulatory status, i.e. is should the waste be managed as a hazardous waste. Testing finds that creosote and pentachlorophenol treated wood do not typically leach preservative concentrations at sufficient quantities to be characterized as a hazardous waste in the US. Chromated copper arsenate (CCA) treated wood does often leach arsenic (As) and chromium (Cr) above hazardous waste thresholds, but in most of the US, CCA-treated wood is excluded from being defined as a hazardous waste because of a specific exemption under resource conservation and recovery act (RCRA). Other national or state specific regulations may impact disposal-end management requirements. The primary management options for discarded treated wood include landfilling, combustion and recycling. Landfilling is typically the least expensive option, but this practice is accompanied by concerns such as placement and compaction difficulties and the potential for contamination of leachate and groundwater. Recent research suggests that As leaching may pose a risk to groundwater at unlined C&D debris landfills and leachate management problems at a lined facility. Combustion is commonly practiced to recover energy from creosote and pentachlorophenol treated wood. Arsenic from CCA-treated wood may volatilizes at typical combustion temperatures so combustion facilities should be equipped with appropriate air pollution control devices. Recycling practices and extraction technologies such as bioremediation, chemical extraction, electrodialytic extraction and liquefaction have been developed, but these systems are more costly than traditional disposal options and separation of treated wood from the mixed wood stream can be challenging. As alternative treated wood products are developed and used, manufacturers should consider disposal-end management.",
author = "Timothy Townsend and Brajesh Dubey and Solo-Gabriele, {Helena M}",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1021/bk-2008-0982.ch033",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780841239517",
volume = "982",
series = "ACS Symposium Series",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
pages = "545--562",
booktitle = "ACS Symposium Series",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Disposal management of preservative-treated wood products

AU - Townsend, Timothy

AU - Dubey, Brajesh

AU - Solo-Gabriele, Helena M

PY - 2008/4/2

Y1 - 2008/4/2

N2 - When treated wood structures reach the end of their useful lifespan they must be disposed of. Proper management of the preservative-containing wood is necessary to minimize any potential risk to human health and the environment. Treated wood products enter the waste stream in small amounts as remnants during construction activities, and at a much larger magnitude as a result of demolition. The first step in discarded treated wood management is determination of appropriate regulatory status, i.e. is should the waste be managed as a hazardous waste. Testing finds that creosote and pentachlorophenol treated wood do not typically leach preservative concentrations at sufficient quantities to be characterized as a hazardous waste in the US. Chromated copper arsenate (CCA) treated wood does often leach arsenic (As) and chromium (Cr) above hazardous waste thresholds, but in most of the US, CCA-treated wood is excluded from being defined as a hazardous waste because of a specific exemption under resource conservation and recovery act (RCRA). Other national or state specific regulations may impact disposal-end management requirements. The primary management options for discarded treated wood include landfilling, combustion and recycling. Landfilling is typically the least expensive option, but this practice is accompanied by concerns such as placement and compaction difficulties and the potential for contamination of leachate and groundwater. Recent research suggests that As leaching may pose a risk to groundwater at unlined C&D debris landfills and leachate management problems at a lined facility. Combustion is commonly practiced to recover energy from creosote and pentachlorophenol treated wood. Arsenic from CCA-treated wood may volatilizes at typical combustion temperatures so combustion facilities should be equipped with appropriate air pollution control devices. Recycling practices and extraction technologies such as bioremediation, chemical extraction, electrodialytic extraction and liquefaction have been developed, but these systems are more costly than traditional disposal options and separation of treated wood from the mixed wood stream can be challenging. As alternative treated wood products are developed and used, manufacturers should consider disposal-end management.

AB - When treated wood structures reach the end of their useful lifespan they must be disposed of. Proper management of the preservative-containing wood is necessary to minimize any potential risk to human health and the environment. Treated wood products enter the waste stream in small amounts as remnants during construction activities, and at a much larger magnitude as a result of demolition. The first step in discarded treated wood management is determination of appropriate regulatory status, i.e. is should the waste be managed as a hazardous waste. Testing finds that creosote and pentachlorophenol treated wood do not typically leach preservative concentrations at sufficient quantities to be characterized as a hazardous waste in the US. Chromated copper arsenate (CCA) treated wood does often leach arsenic (As) and chromium (Cr) above hazardous waste thresholds, but in most of the US, CCA-treated wood is excluded from being defined as a hazardous waste because of a specific exemption under resource conservation and recovery act (RCRA). Other national or state specific regulations may impact disposal-end management requirements. The primary management options for discarded treated wood include landfilling, combustion and recycling. Landfilling is typically the least expensive option, but this practice is accompanied by concerns such as placement and compaction difficulties and the potential for contamination of leachate and groundwater. Recent research suggests that As leaching may pose a risk to groundwater at unlined C&D debris landfills and leachate management problems at a lined facility. Combustion is commonly practiced to recover energy from creosote and pentachlorophenol treated wood. Arsenic from CCA-treated wood may volatilizes at typical combustion temperatures so combustion facilities should be equipped with appropriate air pollution control devices. Recycling practices and extraction technologies such as bioremediation, chemical extraction, electrodialytic extraction and liquefaction have been developed, but these systems are more costly than traditional disposal options and separation of treated wood from the mixed wood stream can be challenging. As alternative treated wood products are developed and used, manufacturers should consider disposal-end management.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905580500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905580500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/bk-2008-0982.ch033

DO - 10.1021/bk-2008-0982.ch033

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9780841239517

VL - 982

T3 - ACS Symposium Series

SP - 545

EP - 562

BT - ACS Symposium Series

PB - American Chemical Society

ER -