Displacement and frequency for maximizing power output resulting from a bout of whole-body vibration

Abigail M. Bedient, Jessica B. Adams, David A. Edwards, Daniel H. Serravite, Emy Huntsman, Sara E. Mow, Bernard A. Roos, Joseph Signorile

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Whole-body vibration (WBV) has been shown to be effective for increasing lower-body power; however, the combination of frequency, displacement, and duration that elicits the best acute response has yet to be determined. The purpose of this study was to identify the protocol eliciting the greatest improvement in power after an acute bout of WBV. Forty men and women participated in this study, in which 8 different combinations of 30, 35, 40, and 50 Hz with 2-mm and 5-mm displacements were tested over 3 days. For all protocols, randomized to reduce potential order effects, subjects underwent 30 seconds of WBV while holding an isometric squat at a knee angle of 2.27 rad. Power was assessed by countermovement jumps. Subjects performed 3 jumps before WBV, immediately afterward, and 1, 5, and 10 minutes later. The highest normalized peak power (nPP) at each time point was determined using a 4 (frequency) × 2 (displacement) × 5 (time) repeated-measures analysis of variance. Significant effects were seen for frequency (p ≤ 0.026) and time (p ≤ .0001). Post hoc analyses revealed that the 30-Hz condition (1.010 ± 0.003) produced a higher nPP than 35 Hz (1.00 ± 0.003, p ≤ 0.026) and 40 Hz (1.002 ± 0.002, p ≤ 0.028) but not 50 Hz (1.004 ± .002). We also found a significantly higher nPP for the 1-minute post-treatment time point (1.011 ± .0003) vs. all other time points (p ≤ 0.006). Our data show that an acute WBV bout can significantly increase power output at 1 minute post-treatment across all frequencies and displacements, although 30 Hz appears to have a greater effect on power output than either 35 Hz or 40 Hz, but not 50 Hz, at all post-treatment time points.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1683-1687
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Volume23
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2009

Fingerprint

Vibration
Knee
Analysis of Variance
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Acute peak power effects
  • Countermovement jump
  • Triplanar plate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Displacement and frequency for maximizing power output resulting from a bout of whole-body vibration. / Bedient, Abigail M.; Adams, Jessica B.; Edwards, David A.; Serravite, Daniel H.; Huntsman, Emy; Mow, Sara E.; Roos, Bernard A.; Signorile, Joseph.

In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Vol. 23, No. 6, 01.09.2009, p. 1683-1687.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bedient, Abigail M. ; Adams, Jessica B. ; Edwards, David A. ; Serravite, Daniel H. ; Huntsman, Emy ; Mow, Sara E. ; Roos, Bernard A. ; Signorile, Joseph. / Displacement and frequency for maximizing power output resulting from a bout of whole-body vibration. In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2009 ; Vol. 23, No. 6. pp. 1683-1687.
@article{29c02466c6df41c2ab113120c4f6718b,
title = "Displacement and frequency for maximizing power output resulting from a bout of whole-body vibration",
abstract = "Whole-body vibration (WBV) has been shown to be effective for increasing lower-body power; however, the combination of frequency, displacement, and duration that elicits the best acute response has yet to be determined. The purpose of this study was to identify the protocol eliciting the greatest improvement in power after an acute bout of WBV. Forty men and women participated in this study, in which 8 different combinations of 30, 35, 40, and 50 Hz with 2-mm and 5-mm displacements were tested over 3 days. For all protocols, randomized to reduce potential order effects, subjects underwent 30 seconds of WBV while holding an isometric squat at a knee angle of 2.27 rad. Power was assessed by countermovement jumps. Subjects performed 3 jumps before WBV, immediately afterward, and 1, 5, and 10 minutes later. The highest normalized peak power (nPP) at each time point was determined using a 4 (frequency) × 2 (displacement) × 5 (time) repeated-measures analysis of variance. Significant effects were seen for frequency (p ≤ 0.026) and time (p ≤ .0001). Post hoc analyses revealed that the 30-Hz condition (1.010 ± 0.003) produced a higher nPP than 35 Hz (1.00 ± 0.003, p ≤ 0.026) and 40 Hz (1.002 ± 0.002, p ≤ 0.028) but not 50 Hz (1.004 ± .002). We also found a significantly higher nPP for the 1-minute post-treatment time point (1.011 ± .0003) vs. all other time points (p ≤ 0.006). Our data show that an acute WBV bout can significantly increase power output at 1 minute post-treatment across all frequencies and displacements, although 30 Hz appears to have a greater effect on power output than either 35 Hz or 40 Hz, but not 50 Hz, at all post-treatment time points.",
keywords = "Acute peak power effects, Countermovement jump, Triplanar plate",
author = "Bedient, {Abigail M.} and Adams, {Jessica B.} and Edwards, {David A.} and Serravite, {Daniel H.} and Emy Huntsman and Mow, {Sara E.} and Roos, {Bernard A.} and Joseph Signorile",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b45bdc",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "1683--1687",
journal = "Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research",
issn = "1064-8011",
publisher = "NSCA National Strength and Conditioning Association",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Displacement and frequency for maximizing power output resulting from a bout of whole-body vibration

AU - Bedient, Abigail M.

AU - Adams, Jessica B.

AU - Edwards, David A.

AU - Serravite, Daniel H.

AU - Huntsman, Emy

AU - Mow, Sara E.

AU - Roos, Bernard A.

AU - Signorile, Joseph

PY - 2009/9/1

Y1 - 2009/9/1

N2 - Whole-body vibration (WBV) has been shown to be effective for increasing lower-body power; however, the combination of frequency, displacement, and duration that elicits the best acute response has yet to be determined. The purpose of this study was to identify the protocol eliciting the greatest improvement in power after an acute bout of WBV. Forty men and women participated in this study, in which 8 different combinations of 30, 35, 40, and 50 Hz with 2-mm and 5-mm displacements were tested over 3 days. For all protocols, randomized to reduce potential order effects, subjects underwent 30 seconds of WBV while holding an isometric squat at a knee angle of 2.27 rad. Power was assessed by countermovement jumps. Subjects performed 3 jumps before WBV, immediately afterward, and 1, 5, and 10 minutes later. The highest normalized peak power (nPP) at each time point was determined using a 4 (frequency) × 2 (displacement) × 5 (time) repeated-measures analysis of variance. Significant effects were seen for frequency (p ≤ 0.026) and time (p ≤ .0001). Post hoc analyses revealed that the 30-Hz condition (1.010 ± 0.003) produced a higher nPP than 35 Hz (1.00 ± 0.003, p ≤ 0.026) and 40 Hz (1.002 ± 0.002, p ≤ 0.028) but not 50 Hz (1.004 ± .002). We also found a significantly higher nPP for the 1-minute post-treatment time point (1.011 ± .0003) vs. all other time points (p ≤ 0.006). Our data show that an acute WBV bout can significantly increase power output at 1 minute post-treatment across all frequencies and displacements, although 30 Hz appears to have a greater effect on power output than either 35 Hz or 40 Hz, but not 50 Hz, at all post-treatment time points.

AB - Whole-body vibration (WBV) has been shown to be effective for increasing lower-body power; however, the combination of frequency, displacement, and duration that elicits the best acute response has yet to be determined. The purpose of this study was to identify the protocol eliciting the greatest improvement in power after an acute bout of WBV. Forty men and women participated in this study, in which 8 different combinations of 30, 35, 40, and 50 Hz with 2-mm and 5-mm displacements were tested over 3 days. For all protocols, randomized to reduce potential order effects, subjects underwent 30 seconds of WBV while holding an isometric squat at a knee angle of 2.27 rad. Power was assessed by countermovement jumps. Subjects performed 3 jumps before WBV, immediately afterward, and 1, 5, and 10 minutes later. The highest normalized peak power (nPP) at each time point was determined using a 4 (frequency) × 2 (displacement) × 5 (time) repeated-measures analysis of variance. Significant effects were seen for frequency (p ≤ 0.026) and time (p ≤ .0001). Post hoc analyses revealed that the 30-Hz condition (1.010 ± 0.003) produced a higher nPP than 35 Hz (1.00 ± 0.003, p ≤ 0.026) and 40 Hz (1.002 ± 0.002, p ≤ 0.028) but not 50 Hz (1.004 ± .002). We also found a significantly higher nPP for the 1-minute post-treatment time point (1.011 ± .0003) vs. all other time points (p ≤ 0.006). Our data show that an acute WBV bout can significantly increase power output at 1 minute post-treatment across all frequencies and displacements, although 30 Hz appears to have a greater effect on power output than either 35 Hz or 40 Hz, but not 50 Hz, at all post-treatment time points.

KW - Acute peak power effects

KW - Countermovement jump

KW - Triplanar plate

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70449334581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70449334581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b45bdc

DO - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b45bdc

M3 - Article

C2 - 19675496

AN - SCOPUS:70449334581

VL - 23

SP - 1683

EP - 1687

JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

JF - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

SN - 1064-8011

IS - 6

ER -