Discrepancy between computed tomography coronary angiography and selective coronary angiography in the pre-stenting assessment of coronary lesion length

K. H. Soon, H. M O Farouque, I. Chaitowitz, N. Cox, J. B. Selvanayagam, B. Zakhem, K. W. Bell, Y. L. Lim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We aimed to compare the lesion length measured on computed tomography coronary angiography (CT-CA) with the selective coronary angiography (SCA) lesion length measured on quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). Compared with SCA, CT-CA has the advantage of showing the lumen and the atherosclerotic plaque in the arterial wall. This prospective observational study involved 44 coronary lesions. Computed tomography coronary angiography was carried out with an electrocardiogram-gated 16-slice CT before percutaneous coronary intervention. A cardiologist and a radiologist measured CT lesion lengths in consensus, whereas an interventional cardiologist carried out QCA to obtain SCA lesion lengths independently. The median difference of (CT lesion length - SCA lesion length) was 9.84 mm (95%CI: [7.26, 13.34]). The median difference of (stent length - SCA lesion length) was 7.68 mm (95%CI: [6.29, 9.26]); the median difference of (stent length - CT length) was -2.63 mm (95%CI: [-5.80, 0.05]). The mean ratio of stent length to SCA lesion length was 2.07 (95%CI: [1.83, 2.30]). The mean ratio of stent length to CT-CA lesion length was 0.97 (95%CI: [0.83, 1.11]). In the subgroup of drug-eluting stents (17 lesions), the median difference of (stent length - SCA lesion length) was 9.76 mm (95%CI: [6.59, 13.28]); the median difference of (stent length - CT length) was -5.2 mm (95%CI: [-11, 0.5]). The mean ratio of stent length to CT-CA lesion length was 0.93 (95%CI: [0.68, 1.17]). Computed tomography lesion length was substantially longer than SCA lesion length measured by QCA. Routine practice of choosing stent length based on QCA may underestimate the actual length of target lesion. This may lead to incomplete coverage of the target lesion, particularly when drug-eluting stents are used.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)440-445
Number of pages6
JournalAustralasian Radiology
Volume51
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Coronary Angiography
Stents
Computed Tomography Angiography
Drug-Eluting Stents
Atherosclerotic Plaques
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Observational Studies

Keywords

  • Coronary
  • Imaging
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention
  • Quantitative coronary angiography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Discrepancy between computed tomography coronary angiography and selective coronary angiography in the pre-stenting assessment of coronary lesion length. / Soon, K. H.; Farouque, H. M O; Chaitowitz, I.; Cox, N.; Selvanayagam, J. B.; Zakhem, B.; Bell, K. W.; Lim, Y. L.

In: Australasian Radiology, Vol. 51, No. 5, 10.2007, p. 440-445.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Soon, K. H. ; Farouque, H. M O ; Chaitowitz, I. ; Cox, N. ; Selvanayagam, J. B. ; Zakhem, B. ; Bell, K. W. ; Lim, Y. L. / Discrepancy between computed tomography coronary angiography and selective coronary angiography in the pre-stenting assessment of coronary lesion length. In: Australasian Radiology. 2007 ; Vol. 51, No. 5. pp. 440-445.
@article{bcf19639a10c41b6bb5eacd2abc21685,
title = "Discrepancy between computed tomography coronary angiography and selective coronary angiography in the pre-stenting assessment of coronary lesion length",
abstract = "We aimed to compare the lesion length measured on computed tomography coronary angiography (CT-CA) with the selective coronary angiography (SCA) lesion length measured on quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). Compared with SCA, CT-CA has the advantage of showing the lumen and the atherosclerotic plaque in the arterial wall. This prospective observational study involved 44 coronary lesions. Computed tomography coronary angiography was carried out with an electrocardiogram-gated 16-slice CT before percutaneous coronary intervention. A cardiologist and a radiologist measured CT lesion lengths in consensus, whereas an interventional cardiologist carried out QCA to obtain SCA lesion lengths independently. The median difference of (CT lesion length - SCA lesion length) was 9.84 mm (95{\%}CI: [7.26, 13.34]). The median difference of (stent length - SCA lesion length) was 7.68 mm (95{\%}CI: [6.29, 9.26]); the median difference of (stent length - CT length) was -2.63 mm (95{\%}CI: [-5.80, 0.05]). The mean ratio of stent length to SCA lesion length was 2.07 (95{\%}CI: [1.83, 2.30]). The mean ratio of stent length to CT-CA lesion length was 0.97 (95{\%}CI: [0.83, 1.11]). In the subgroup of drug-eluting stents (17 lesions), the median difference of (stent length - SCA lesion length) was 9.76 mm (95{\%}CI: [6.59, 13.28]); the median difference of (stent length - CT length) was -5.2 mm (95{\%}CI: [-11, 0.5]). The mean ratio of stent length to CT-CA lesion length was 0.93 (95{\%}CI: [0.68, 1.17]). Computed tomography lesion length was substantially longer than SCA lesion length measured by QCA. Routine practice of choosing stent length based on QCA may underestimate the actual length of target lesion. This may lead to incomplete coverage of the target lesion, particularly when drug-eluting stents are used.",
keywords = "Coronary, Imaging, Percutaneous coronary intervention, Quantitative coronary angiography",
author = "Soon, {K. H.} and Farouque, {H. M O} and I. Chaitowitz and N. Cox and Selvanayagam, {J. B.} and B. Zakhem and Bell, {K. W.} and Lim, {Y. L.}",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/j.1440-1673.2007.01868.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "440--445",
journal = "Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology",
issn = "1754-9477",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discrepancy between computed tomography coronary angiography and selective coronary angiography in the pre-stenting assessment of coronary lesion length

AU - Soon, K. H.

AU - Farouque, H. M O

AU - Chaitowitz, I.

AU - Cox, N.

AU - Selvanayagam, J. B.

AU - Zakhem, B.

AU - Bell, K. W.

AU - Lim, Y. L.

PY - 2007/10

Y1 - 2007/10

N2 - We aimed to compare the lesion length measured on computed tomography coronary angiography (CT-CA) with the selective coronary angiography (SCA) lesion length measured on quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). Compared with SCA, CT-CA has the advantage of showing the lumen and the atherosclerotic plaque in the arterial wall. This prospective observational study involved 44 coronary lesions. Computed tomography coronary angiography was carried out with an electrocardiogram-gated 16-slice CT before percutaneous coronary intervention. A cardiologist and a radiologist measured CT lesion lengths in consensus, whereas an interventional cardiologist carried out QCA to obtain SCA lesion lengths independently. The median difference of (CT lesion length - SCA lesion length) was 9.84 mm (95%CI: [7.26, 13.34]). The median difference of (stent length - SCA lesion length) was 7.68 mm (95%CI: [6.29, 9.26]); the median difference of (stent length - CT length) was -2.63 mm (95%CI: [-5.80, 0.05]). The mean ratio of stent length to SCA lesion length was 2.07 (95%CI: [1.83, 2.30]). The mean ratio of stent length to CT-CA lesion length was 0.97 (95%CI: [0.83, 1.11]). In the subgroup of drug-eluting stents (17 lesions), the median difference of (stent length - SCA lesion length) was 9.76 mm (95%CI: [6.59, 13.28]); the median difference of (stent length - CT length) was -5.2 mm (95%CI: [-11, 0.5]). The mean ratio of stent length to CT-CA lesion length was 0.93 (95%CI: [0.68, 1.17]). Computed tomography lesion length was substantially longer than SCA lesion length measured by QCA. Routine practice of choosing stent length based on QCA may underestimate the actual length of target lesion. This may lead to incomplete coverage of the target lesion, particularly when drug-eluting stents are used.

AB - We aimed to compare the lesion length measured on computed tomography coronary angiography (CT-CA) with the selective coronary angiography (SCA) lesion length measured on quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). Compared with SCA, CT-CA has the advantage of showing the lumen and the atherosclerotic plaque in the arterial wall. This prospective observational study involved 44 coronary lesions. Computed tomography coronary angiography was carried out with an electrocardiogram-gated 16-slice CT before percutaneous coronary intervention. A cardiologist and a radiologist measured CT lesion lengths in consensus, whereas an interventional cardiologist carried out QCA to obtain SCA lesion lengths independently. The median difference of (CT lesion length - SCA lesion length) was 9.84 mm (95%CI: [7.26, 13.34]). The median difference of (stent length - SCA lesion length) was 7.68 mm (95%CI: [6.29, 9.26]); the median difference of (stent length - CT length) was -2.63 mm (95%CI: [-5.80, 0.05]). The mean ratio of stent length to SCA lesion length was 2.07 (95%CI: [1.83, 2.30]). The mean ratio of stent length to CT-CA lesion length was 0.97 (95%CI: [0.83, 1.11]). In the subgroup of drug-eluting stents (17 lesions), the median difference of (stent length - SCA lesion length) was 9.76 mm (95%CI: [6.59, 13.28]); the median difference of (stent length - CT length) was -5.2 mm (95%CI: [-11, 0.5]). The mean ratio of stent length to CT-CA lesion length was 0.93 (95%CI: [0.68, 1.17]). Computed tomography lesion length was substantially longer than SCA lesion length measured by QCA. Routine practice of choosing stent length based on QCA may underestimate the actual length of target lesion. This may lead to incomplete coverage of the target lesion, particularly when drug-eluting stents are used.

KW - Coronary

KW - Imaging

KW - Percutaneous coronary intervention

KW - Quantitative coronary angiography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548399806&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548399806&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2007.01868.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2007.01868.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 17803796

AN - SCOPUS:34548399806

VL - 51

SP - 440

EP - 445

JO - Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology

JF - Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology

SN - 1754-9477

IS - 5

ER -