Discrepancies between clinical assessments of sensory function and electrical perceptual thresholds after incomplete chronic cervical spinal cord injury

R. A. Macklin, V. J. Brooke, F. J. Calabro, P. H. Ellaway, Monica Perez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study design:Prospective experimental.Objectives:To compare sensory function as revealed by light touch and pin prick tests of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) and the electrical perceptual threshold (EPT) exams in individuals with chronic incomplete cervical spinal cord injury (SCI).Setting:Pittsburgh, United States.Methods:EPT was tested using cutaneous electrical stimulation (0.5 ms pulse width, 3 Hz) in 32 healthy controls and in 17 participants with SCI over key points on dermatomes C2 to T4 on each side of the body. Light touch and pin prick ISNCSCI scores were tested at the same key dermatomes in SCI participants.Results:In controls, EPT values were higher in older males (1.26±0.2 mA, mean±s.d.) compared with younger males (1.0±0.2 mA) and older females (0.9±0.2 mA), regardless of the dermatome and side tested. Fifteen out of the seventeen SCI participants showed that the level of sensory impairment detected by the EPT was below the level detected by the ISNCSCI (mean=4.5±2.4, range 1-9). The frequency distribution of EPTs was similar to older male controls in dermatomes above but not below the ISNCSCI sensory level. The difference between EPT and ISNCSCI sensory level was negatively correlated with the time post injury.Conclusions:The results show that, in the chronic stage of cervical SCI, the EPT reveals spared sensory function at lower (∼5) spinal segments compared with the ISNCSCI sensory exam. It is hence found that the EPT is a sensitive tool to assess recovery of sensory function after chronic SCI.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)16-23
Number of pages8
JournalSpinal Cord
Volume54
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Spinal Cord Injuries
Touch
Cervical Cord
Recovery of Function
Electric Stimulation
Research Design
Prospective Studies
Skin

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Discrepancies between clinical assessments of sensory function and electrical perceptual thresholds after incomplete chronic cervical spinal cord injury. / Macklin, R. A.; Brooke, V. J.; Calabro, F. J.; Ellaway, P. H.; Perez, Monica.

In: Spinal Cord, Vol. 54, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 16-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ed6e01fb192e4d51a147a559cca091ff,
title = "Discrepancies between clinical assessments of sensory function and electrical perceptual thresholds after incomplete chronic cervical spinal cord injury",
abstract = "Study design:Prospective experimental.Objectives:To compare sensory function as revealed by light touch and pin prick tests of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) and the electrical perceptual threshold (EPT) exams in individuals with chronic incomplete cervical spinal cord injury (SCI).Setting:Pittsburgh, United States.Methods:EPT was tested using cutaneous electrical stimulation (0.5 ms pulse width, 3 Hz) in 32 healthy controls and in 17 participants with SCI over key points on dermatomes C2 to T4 on each side of the body. Light touch and pin prick ISNCSCI scores were tested at the same key dermatomes in SCI participants.Results:In controls, EPT values were higher in older males (1.26±0.2 mA, mean±s.d.) compared with younger males (1.0±0.2 mA) and older females (0.9±0.2 mA), regardless of the dermatome and side tested. Fifteen out of the seventeen SCI participants showed that the level of sensory impairment detected by the EPT was below the level detected by the ISNCSCI (mean=4.5±2.4, range 1-9). The frequency distribution of EPTs was similar to older male controls in dermatomes above but not below the ISNCSCI sensory level. The difference between EPT and ISNCSCI sensory level was negatively correlated with the time post injury.Conclusions:The results show that, in the chronic stage of cervical SCI, the EPT reveals spared sensory function at lower (∼5) spinal segments compared with the ISNCSCI sensory exam. It is hence found that the EPT is a sensitive tool to assess recovery of sensory function after chronic SCI.",
author = "Macklin, {R. A.} and Brooke, {V. J.} and Calabro, {F. J.} and Ellaway, {P. H.} and Monica Perez",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/sc.2015.104",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "16--23",
journal = "Spinal Cord",
issn = "1362-4393",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discrepancies between clinical assessments of sensory function and electrical perceptual thresholds after incomplete chronic cervical spinal cord injury

AU - Macklin, R. A.

AU - Brooke, V. J.

AU - Calabro, F. J.

AU - Ellaway, P. H.

AU - Perez, Monica

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Study design:Prospective experimental.Objectives:To compare sensory function as revealed by light touch and pin prick tests of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) and the electrical perceptual threshold (EPT) exams in individuals with chronic incomplete cervical spinal cord injury (SCI).Setting:Pittsburgh, United States.Methods:EPT was tested using cutaneous electrical stimulation (0.5 ms pulse width, 3 Hz) in 32 healthy controls and in 17 participants with SCI over key points on dermatomes C2 to T4 on each side of the body. Light touch and pin prick ISNCSCI scores were tested at the same key dermatomes in SCI participants.Results:In controls, EPT values were higher in older males (1.26±0.2 mA, mean±s.d.) compared with younger males (1.0±0.2 mA) and older females (0.9±0.2 mA), regardless of the dermatome and side tested. Fifteen out of the seventeen SCI participants showed that the level of sensory impairment detected by the EPT was below the level detected by the ISNCSCI (mean=4.5±2.4, range 1-9). The frequency distribution of EPTs was similar to older male controls in dermatomes above but not below the ISNCSCI sensory level. The difference between EPT and ISNCSCI sensory level was negatively correlated with the time post injury.Conclusions:The results show that, in the chronic stage of cervical SCI, the EPT reveals spared sensory function at lower (∼5) spinal segments compared with the ISNCSCI sensory exam. It is hence found that the EPT is a sensitive tool to assess recovery of sensory function after chronic SCI.

AB - Study design:Prospective experimental.Objectives:To compare sensory function as revealed by light touch and pin prick tests of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) and the electrical perceptual threshold (EPT) exams in individuals with chronic incomplete cervical spinal cord injury (SCI).Setting:Pittsburgh, United States.Methods:EPT was tested using cutaneous electrical stimulation (0.5 ms pulse width, 3 Hz) in 32 healthy controls and in 17 participants with SCI over key points on dermatomes C2 to T4 on each side of the body. Light touch and pin prick ISNCSCI scores were tested at the same key dermatomes in SCI participants.Results:In controls, EPT values were higher in older males (1.26±0.2 mA, mean±s.d.) compared with younger males (1.0±0.2 mA) and older females (0.9±0.2 mA), regardless of the dermatome and side tested. Fifteen out of the seventeen SCI participants showed that the level of sensory impairment detected by the EPT was below the level detected by the ISNCSCI (mean=4.5±2.4, range 1-9). The frequency distribution of EPTs was similar to older male controls in dermatomes above but not below the ISNCSCI sensory level. The difference between EPT and ISNCSCI sensory level was negatively correlated with the time post injury.Conclusions:The results show that, in the chronic stage of cervical SCI, the EPT reveals spared sensory function at lower (∼5) spinal segments compared with the ISNCSCI sensory exam. It is hence found that the EPT is a sensitive tool to assess recovery of sensory function after chronic SCI.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983134911&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983134911&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/sc.2015.104

DO - 10.1038/sc.2015.104

M3 - Article

C2 - 26123212

AN - SCOPUS:84983134911

VL - 54

SP - 16

EP - 23

JO - Spinal Cord

JF - Spinal Cord

SN - 1362-4393

IS - 1

ER -