Disaster reanimatology potentials

A structured interview study in armenia i. methodology and preliminary results

Miroslav Klain, Edmund Ricci, Peter Safar, Victor Semenov, Ernesto Pretto, Samuel Tisherman, Joel Abrams, Comfort Louise

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In general, preparations for disasters which result in mass casualties do not incorporate a modern resuscitation approach. We explored the life-savingpotential of and time limits for life-supporting first aid (LSFA), advanced trauma life support (ATLS), resuscitative surgery, and prolonged life support (PLS: intensive care) following the earthquake in Armenia on 7 December 1988. We used a structured, retrospective interview method applied previously to evaluation of emergency medical services (EMS) in the United States. A total of 120 survivors of and participants in the earthquake in Armenia were interviewed on site (49 lay eyewitnesses, 20 search-rescue personnel, 39 medical personnel and records, and 12 administrators). Answers were verified by crosschecks. Preliminary results permit the following generalizations: 1) a significant number of victims died slowly as the result of injuries such as external hemorrhage, head injury with coma, shock, or crush syndrome; 2) early search and rescue was performed primarily by uninjured covictims using hand tools; 3) many lives potentially could have been saved by the use of LSFA and ATLS started during extrication of crushed victims. 4) medical teams from neighboringLMS systems started to arrive at the site at 2–3 hours and therefore, ATLS could have been provided in time to save lives and limbs; 5) some amputations had to be performed in thefield to enable extrication; 6) the usefulness of other resuscitative surgery in thefield needs to be clarified; 7) evacuations zvere rapid; 8) air evacuation proved essential; 9) hospital intensive care was well organized; and 10) international medical aid, which arrived after 48 hours, was too late to impact on resuscitation. Definitive analysis of data in the near future will lead to recommendations for local, regional, and National Disaster Medical Systems (NDMS).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)135-152
Number of pages18
JournalPrehospital and Disaster Medicine
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Armenia
Advanced Trauma Life Support Care
Disasters
Interviews
Earthquakes
First Aid
Critical Care
Resuscitation
Crush Syndrome
Mass Casualty Incidents
Emergency Medical Services
Coma
Administrative Personnel
Amputation
Craniocerebral Trauma
Medical Records
Survivors
Shock
Extremities
Hand

Keywords

  • Advanced Life Support
  • Earthquake
  • Emergency Medical Services
  • Evaluation
  • First Aid
  • Health Care Rescue
  • Resuscitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Disaster reanimatology potentials : A structured interview study in armenia i. methodology and preliminary results. / Klain, Miroslav; Ricci, Edmund; Safar, Peter; Semenov, Victor; Pretto, Ernesto; Tisherman, Samuel; Abrams, Joel; Louise, Comfort.

In: Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1989, p. 135-152.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Klain, M, Ricci, E, Safar, P, Semenov, V, Pretto, E, Tisherman, S, Abrams, J & Louise, C 1989, 'Disaster reanimatology potentials: A structured interview study in armenia i. methodology and preliminary results', Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 135-152. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X00029939
Klain, Miroslav ; Ricci, Edmund ; Safar, Peter ; Semenov, Victor ; Pretto, Ernesto ; Tisherman, Samuel ; Abrams, Joel ; Louise, Comfort. / Disaster reanimatology potentials : A structured interview study in armenia i. methodology and preliminary results. In: Prehospital and Disaster Medicine. 1989 ; Vol. 4, No. 2. pp. 135-152.
@article{d398491383ce42309ad4e071f9d4c374,
title = "Disaster reanimatology potentials: A structured interview study in armenia i. methodology and preliminary results",
abstract = "In general, preparations for disasters which result in mass casualties do not incorporate a modern resuscitation approach. We explored the life-savingpotential of and time limits for life-supporting first aid (LSFA), advanced trauma life support (ATLS), resuscitative surgery, and prolonged life support (PLS: intensive care) following the earthquake in Armenia on 7 December 1988. We used a structured, retrospective interview method applied previously to evaluation of emergency medical services (EMS) in the United States. A total of 120 survivors of and participants in the earthquake in Armenia were interviewed on site (49 lay eyewitnesses, 20 search-rescue personnel, 39 medical personnel and records, and 12 administrators). Answers were verified by crosschecks. Preliminary results permit the following generalizations: 1) a significant number of victims died slowly as the result of injuries such as external hemorrhage, head injury with coma, shock, or crush syndrome; 2) early search and rescue was performed primarily by uninjured covictims using hand tools; 3) many lives potentially could have been saved by the use of LSFA and ATLS started during extrication of crushed victims. 4) medical teams from neighboringLMS systems started to arrive at the site at 2–3 hours and therefore, ATLS could have been provided in time to save lives and limbs; 5) some amputations had to be performed in thefield to enable extrication; 6) the usefulness of other resuscitative surgery in thefield needs to be clarified; 7) evacuations zvere rapid; 8) air evacuation proved essential; 9) hospital intensive care was well organized; and 10) international medical aid, which arrived after 48 hours, was too late to impact on resuscitation. Definitive analysis of data in the near future will lead to recommendations for local, regional, and National Disaster Medical Systems (NDMS).",
keywords = "Advanced Life Support, Earthquake, Emergency Medical Services, Evaluation, First Aid, Health Care Rescue, Resuscitation",
author = "Miroslav Klain and Edmund Ricci and Peter Safar and Victor Semenov and Ernesto Pretto and Samuel Tisherman and Joel Abrams and Comfort Louise",
year = "1989",
doi = "10.1017/S1049023X00029939",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "135--152",
journal = "Prehospital and Disaster Medicine",
issn = "1049-023X",
publisher = "World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disaster reanimatology potentials

T2 - A structured interview study in armenia i. methodology and preliminary results

AU - Klain, Miroslav

AU - Ricci, Edmund

AU - Safar, Peter

AU - Semenov, Victor

AU - Pretto, Ernesto

AU - Tisherman, Samuel

AU - Abrams, Joel

AU - Louise, Comfort

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - In general, preparations for disasters which result in mass casualties do not incorporate a modern resuscitation approach. We explored the life-savingpotential of and time limits for life-supporting first aid (LSFA), advanced trauma life support (ATLS), resuscitative surgery, and prolonged life support (PLS: intensive care) following the earthquake in Armenia on 7 December 1988. We used a structured, retrospective interview method applied previously to evaluation of emergency medical services (EMS) in the United States. A total of 120 survivors of and participants in the earthquake in Armenia were interviewed on site (49 lay eyewitnesses, 20 search-rescue personnel, 39 medical personnel and records, and 12 administrators). Answers were verified by crosschecks. Preliminary results permit the following generalizations: 1) a significant number of victims died slowly as the result of injuries such as external hemorrhage, head injury with coma, shock, or crush syndrome; 2) early search and rescue was performed primarily by uninjured covictims using hand tools; 3) many lives potentially could have been saved by the use of LSFA and ATLS started during extrication of crushed victims. 4) medical teams from neighboringLMS systems started to arrive at the site at 2–3 hours and therefore, ATLS could have been provided in time to save lives and limbs; 5) some amputations had to be performed in thefield to enable extrication; 6) the usefulness of other resuscitative surgery in thefield needs to be clarified; 7) evacuations zvere rapid; 8) air evacuation proved essential; 9) hospital intensive care was well organized; and 10) international medical aid, which arrived after 48 hours, was too late to impact on resuscitation. Definitive analysis of data in the near future will lead to recommendations for local, regional, and National Disaster Medical Systems (NDMS).

AB - In general, preparations for disasters which result in mass casualties do not incorporate a modern resuscitation approach. We explored the life-savingpotential of and time limits for life-supporting first aid (LSFA), advanced trauma life support (ATLS), resuscitative surgery, and prolonged life support (PLS: intensive care) following the earthquake in Armenia on 7 December 1988. We used a structured, retrospective interview method applied previously to evaluation of emergency medical services (EMS) in the United States. A total of 120 survivors of and participants in the earthquake in Armenia were interviewed on site (49 lay eyewitnesses, 20 search-rescue personnel, 39 medical personnel and records, and 12 administrators). Answers were verified by crosschecks. Preliminary results permit the following generalizations: 1) a significant number of victims died slowly as the result of injuries such as external hemorrhage, head injury with coma, shock, or crush syndrome; 2) early search and rescue was performed primarily by uninjured covictims using hand tools; 3) many lives potentially could have been saved by the use of LSFA and ATLS started during extrication of crushed victims. 4) medical teams from neighboringLMS systems started to arrive at the site at 2–3 hours and therefore, ATLS could have been provided in time to save lives and limbs; 5) some amputations had to be performed in thefield to enable extrication; 6) the usefulness of other resuscitative surgery in thefield needs to be clarified; 7) evacuations zvere rapid; 8) air evacuation proved essential; 9) hospital intensive care was well organized; and 10) international medical aid, which arrived after 48 hours, was too late to impact on resuscitation. Definitive analysis of data in the near future will lead to recommendations for local, regional, and National Disaster Medical Systems (NDMS).

KW - Advanced Life Support

KW - Earthquake

KW - Emergency Medical Services

KW - Evaluation

KW - First Aid

KW - Health Care Rescue

KW - Resuscitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971137259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84971137259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1049023X00029939

DO - 10.1017/S1049023X00029939

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 135

EP - 152

JO - Prehospital and Disaster Medicine

JF - Prehospital and Disaster Medicine

SN - 1049-023X

IS - 2

ER -