Differences in the outcome of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions at teaching versus non-teaching hospitals

Amneet Sandhu, Mauro Moscucci, Simon Dixon, David H. Wohns, David Share, Thomas Lalonde, Dean Smith, Hitinder S. Gurm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Teaching hospitals have superior outcomes for major medical conditions including cardiovascular disease compared to non-teaching hospitals. This may not be applicable to invasive cardiac procedures given a potential increase in complications due to trainee participation. Methods We assessed the impact of hospital teaching status on the outcome of 89,048 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Teaching hospitals were defined as trainee involvement in greater than 50% of PCIs conducted at that hospital and corresponded to teaching status granted by national accreditation agencies. Unadjusted and risk adjusted analyses were used to determine differences in process of care, morbidity and mortality. Results Of 89,048 patients studied, 30,870 received their PCI at teaching hospitals and 58,178 at non-teaching hospitals. Risk-adjusted analysis showed no significant difference in death, in-hospital myocardial infarction, contrast induced nephropathy or gastrointestinal bleeding between teaching and non-teaching hospitals. PCI at teaching hospitals was associated with a lower rate of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.49-0.83; P =.0009) and an increased rate of vascular complications (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.21-1.46; P <.0001). Conclusions General outcomes of patients undergoing PCI are similar across hospital types. However, PCI at teaching hospitals is associated with increased risk of vascular complications and reduced risk of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting compared to non-teaching hospitals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)401-408
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Heart Journal
Volume166
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2013

Fingerprint

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Teaching Hospitals
Teaching
Coronary Artery Bypass
Blood Vessels
Emergencies
Accreditation
Cardiovascular Diseases
Myocardial Infarction
Hemorrhage
Morbidity
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Differences in the outcome of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions at teaching versus non-teaching hospitals. / Sandhu, Amneet; Moscucci, Mauro; Dixon, Simon; Wohns, David H.; Share, David; Lalonde, Thomas; Smith, Dean; Gurm, Hitinder S.

In: American Heart Journal, Vol. 166, No. 3, 01.09.2013, p. 401-408.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sandhu, A, Moscucci, M, Dixon, S, Wohns, DH, Share, D, Lalonde, T, Smith, D & Gurm, HS 2013, 'Differences in the outcome of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions at teaching versus non-teaching hospitals', American Heart Journal, vol. 166, no. 3, pp. 401-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2013.06.018
Sandhu, Amneet ; Moscucci, Mauro ; Dixon, Simon ; Wohns, David H. ; Share, David ; Lalonde, Thomas ; Smith, Dean ; Gurm, Hitinder S. / Differences in the outcome of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions at teaching versus non-teaching hospitals. In: American Heart Journal. 2013 ; Vol. 166, No. 3. pp. 401-408.
@article{e38ecf3626334c5cae62a717fe11d595,
title = "Differences in the outcome of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions at teaching versus non-teaching hospitals",
abstract = "Background Teaching hospitals have superior outcomes for major medical conditions including cardiovascular disease compared to non-teaching hospitals. This may not be applicable to invasive cardiac procedures given a potential increase in complications due to trainee participation. Methods We assessed the impact of hospital teaching status on the outcome of 89,048 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Teaching hospitals were defined as trainee involvement in greater than 50{\%} of PCIs conducted at that hospital and corresponded to teaching status granted by national accreditation agencies. Unadjusted and risk adjusted analyses were used to determine differences in process of care, morbidity and mortality. Results Of 89,048 patients studied, 30,870 received their PCI at teaching hospitals and 58,178 at non-teaching hospitals. Risk-adjusted analysis showed no significant difference in death, in-hospital myocardial infarction, contrast induced nephropathy or gastrointestinal bleeding between teaching and non-teaching hospitals. PCI at teaching hospitals was associated with a lower rate of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (OR, 0.63; 95{\%} CI, 0.49-0.83; P =.0009) and an increased rate of vascular complications (OR, 1.33; 95{\%} CI, 1.21-1.46; P <.0001). Conclusions General outcomes of patients undergoing PCI are similar across hospital types. However, PCI at teaching hospitals is associated with increased risk of vascular complications and reduced risk of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting compared to non-teaching hospitals.",
author = "Amneet Sandhu and Mauro Moscucci and Simon Dixon and Wohns, {David H.} and David Share and Thomas Lalonde and Dean Smith and Gurm, {Hitinder S.}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ahj.2013.06.018",
language = "English",
volume = "166",
pages = "401--408",
journal = "American Heart Journal",
issn = "0002-8703",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences in the outcome of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions at teaching versus non-teaching hospitals

AU - Sandhu, Amneet

AU - Moscucci, Mauro

AU - Dixon, Simon

AU - Wohns, David H.

AU - Share, David

AU - Lalonde, Thomas

AU - Smith, Dean

AU - Gurm, Hitinder S.

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - Background Teaching hospitals have superior outcomes for major medical conditions including cardiovascular disease compared to non-teaching hospitals. This may not be applicable to invasive cardiac procedures given a potential increase in complications due to trainee participation. Methods We assessed the impact of hospital teaching status on the outcome of 89,048 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Teaching hospitals were defined as trainee involvement in greater than 50% of PCIs conducted at that hospital and corresponded to teaching status granted by national accreditation agencies. Unadjusted and risk adjusted analyses were used to determine differences in process of care, morbidity and mortality. Results Of 89,048 patients studied, 30,870 received their PCI at teaching hospitals and 58,178 at non-teaching hospitals. Risk-adjusted analysis showed no significant difference in death, in-hospital myocardial infarction, contrast induced nephropathy or gastrointestinal bleeding between teaching and non-teaching hospitals. PCI at teaching hospitals was associated with a lower rate of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.49-0.83; P =.0009) and an increased rate of vascular complications (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.21-1.46; P <.0001). Conclusions General outcomes of patients undergoing PCI are similar across hospital types. However, PCI at teaching hospitals is associated with increased risk of vascular complications and reduced risk of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting compared to non-teaching hospitals.

AB - Background Teaching hospitals have superior outcomes for major medical conditions including cardiovascular disease compared to non-teaching hospitals. This may not be applicable to invasive cardiac procedures given a potential increase in complications due to trainee participation. Methods We assessed the impact of hospital teaching status on the outcome of 89,048 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Teaching hospitals were defined as trainee involvement in greater than 50% of PCIs conducted at that hospital and corresponded to teaching status granted by national accreditation agencies. Unadjusted and risk adjusted analyses were used to determine differences in process of care, morbidity and mortality. Results Of 89,048 patients studied, 30,870 received their PCI at teaching hospitals and 58,178 at non-teaching hospitals. Risk-adjusted analysis showed no significant difference in death, in-hospital myocardial infarction, contrast induced nephropathy or gastrointestinal bleeding between teaching and non-teaching hospitals. PCI at teaching hospitals was associated with a lower rate of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.49-0.83; P =.0009) and an increased rate of vascular complications (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.21-1.46; P <.0001). Conclusions General outcomes of patients undergoing PCI are similar across hospital types. However, PCI at teaching hospitals is associated with increased risk of vascular complications and reduced risk of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting compared to non-teaching hospitals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883766393&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883766393&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.06.018

DO - 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.06.018

M3 - Article

VL - 166

SP - 401

EP - 408

JO - American Heart Journal

JF - American Heart Journal

SN - 0002-8703

IS - 3

ER -