Differences in clinical activity and medicare payments for female vs male ophthalmologists

Ashvini K. Reddy, Gregory W. Bounds, Sophie J. Bakri, Lynn K. Gordon, Justine R. Smith, Julia A. Haller, Audina Berrocal, Jennifer E. Thorne

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

IMPORTANCE The number of women in ophthalmology is rising. Little is known about their clinical activity and collections. OBJECTIVE To examine whether charges, as reflected in reimbursements from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to ophthalmologists, differ by sex and how disparity relates to differences in clinical activity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective review of the CMS database for payments to ophthalmologists from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2013. The dates of the analysis were February 1 through May 30, 2016. After exclusion of J and Q codes, the total payments to and the number of charges by individual ophthalmologists were analyzed. The mean values were compared using a single t test, and the medians were compared by the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcome measureswere the mean and median CMS payments to male and female ophthalmologists in outpatient, non-facility-based settings. Secondary outcome measures included the number of charges submitted by men and women and the types of charges most commonly submitted by men and women. RESULTS This study included 16 111 ophthalmologists (3078 women [19.1%] and 13 033 men [80.9%]) in 2012 and 16 179 ophthalmologists (3206 women [19.8%] and 12 973 men [80.2%]) in 2013. In 2012, the average female ophthalmologist collected $0.58 (95%CI, $0.54-$0.62; P < .001) for every dollar collected by a male ophthalmologist; comparing the medians, women collected $0.56 (95%CI, $0.50-$0.61; P < .001) for every dollar earned by men. Mean and median collections were similar when comparing female vs male ophthalmologists in 2013 (P < .001). The mean payment per charge was the same for men and women, $66 in 2012 and $64 in 2013. There was a strong association between collections and work product, with female ophthalmologists submitting fewer charges to Medicare in 2012 (median, 1120 charges; difference -935; 95%CI, -1024 to -846; P < .001) and in 2013 (median, 1141 charges; difference -937; 95%CI, -1026 to -848; P < .001) than male ophthalmologists. When corrected by comparing men and women with similar clinical activity, renumeration was still lower for women. In both years, women were underrepresented among ophthalmologists with the highest collections. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Remuneration from the CMS was disparate between male and female ophthalmologists in 2012 and 2013 because of the submission of fewer charges by women. Further studies are necessary to explore root causes for this difference, with equity in opportunity and parity in clinical activity standing to benefit the specialty.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)205-213
Number of pages9
JournalJAMA Ophthalmology
Volume135
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

Medicare
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (U.S.)
Nonparametric Statistics
Ophthalmologists
Remuneration
Ophthalmology
Parity
Outpatients
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Reddy, A. K., Bounds, G. W., Bakri, S. J., Gordon, L. K., Smith, J. R., Haller, J. A., ... Thorne, J. E. (2017). Differences in clinical activity and medicare payments for female vs male ophthalmologists. JAMA Ophthalmology, 135(3), 205-213. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.5399

Differences in clinical activity and medicare payments for female vs male ophthalmologists. / Reddy, Ashvini K.; Bounds, Gregory W.; Bakri, Sophie J.; Gordon, Lynn K.; Smith, Justine R.; Haller, Julia A.; Berrocal, Audina; Thorne, Jennifer E.

In: JAMA Ophthalmology, Vol. 135, No. 3, 01.03.2017, p. 205-213.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Reddy, AK, Bounds, GW, Bakri, SJ, Gordon, LK, Smith, JR, Haller, JA, Berrocal, A & Thorne, JE 2017, 'Differences in clinical activity and medicare payments for female vs male ophthalmologists', JAMA Ophthalmology, vol. 135, no. 3, pp. 205-213. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.5399
Reddy, Ashvini K. ; Bounds, Gregory W. ; Bakri, Sophie J. ; Gordon, Lynn K. ; Smith, Justine R. ; Haller, Julia A. ; Berrocal, Audina ; Thorne, Jennifer E. / Differences in clinical activity and medicare payments for female vs male ophthalmologists. In: JAMA Ophthalmology. 2017 ; Vol. 135, No. 3. pp. 205-213.
@article{74032a320b354e3491e22e8ee695f106,
title = "Differences in clinical activity and medicare payments for female vs male ophthalmologists",
abstract = "IMPORTANCE The number of women in ophthalmology is rising. Little is known about their clinical activity and collections. OBJECTIVE To examine whether charges, as reflected in reimbursements from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to ophthalmologists, differ by sex and how disparity relates to differences in clinical activity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective review of the CMS database for payments to ophthalmologists from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2013. The dates of the analysis were February 1 through May 30, 2016. After exclusion of J and Q codes, the total payments to and the number of charges by individual ophthalmologists were analyzed. The mean values were compared using a single t test, and the medians were compared by the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcome measureswere the mean and median CMS payments to male and female ophthalmologists in outpatient, non-facility-based settings. Secondary outcome measures included the number of charges submitted by men and women and the types of charges most commonly submitted by men and women. RESULTS This study included 16 111 ophthalmologists (3078 women [19.1{\%}] and 13 033 men [80.9{\%}]) in 2012 and 16 179 ophthalmologists (3206 women [19.8{\%}] and 12 973 men [80.2{\%}]) in 2013. In 2012, the average female ophthalmologist collected $0.58 (95{\%}CI, $0.54-$0.62; P < .001) for every dollar collected by a male ophthalmologist; comparing the medians, women collected $0.56 (95{\%}CI, $0.50-$0.61; P < .001) for every dollar earned by men. Mean and median collections were similar when comparing female vs male ophthalmologists in 2013 (P < .001). The mean payment per charge was the same for men and women, $66 in 2012 and $64 in 2013. There was a strong association between collections and work product, with female ophthalmologists submitting fewer charges to Medicare in 2012 (median, 1120 charges; difference -935; 95{\%}CI, -1024 to -846; P < .001) and in 2013 (median, 1141 charges; difference -937; 95{\%}CI, -1026 to -848; P < .001) than male ophthalmologists. When corrected by comparing men and women with similar clinical activity, renumeration was still lower for women. In both years, women were underrepresented among ophthalmologists with the highest collections. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Remuneration from the CMS was disparate between male and female ophthalmologists in 2012 and 2013 because of the submission of fewer charges by women. Further studies are necessary to explore root causes for this difference, with equity in opportunity and parity in clinical activity standing to benefit the specialty.",
author = "Reddy, {Ashvini K.} and Bounds, {Gregory W.} and Bakri, {Sophie J.} and Gordon, {Lynn K.} and Smith, {Justine R.} and Haller, {Julia A.} and Audina Berrocal and Thorne, {Jennifer E.}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.5399",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "135",
pages = "205--213",
journal = "JAMA Ophthalmology",
issn = "2168-6165",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences in clinical activity and medicare payments for female vs male ophthalmologists

AU - Reddy, Ashvini K.

AU - Bounds, Gregory W.

AU - Bakri, Sophie J.

AU - Gordon, Lynn K.

AU - Smith, Justine R.

AU - Haller, Julia A.

AU - Berrocal, Audina

AU - Thorne, Jennifer E.

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - IMPORTANCE The number of women in ophthalmology is rising. Little is known about their clinical activity and collections. OBJECTIVE To examine whether charges, as reflected in reimbursements from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to ophthalmologists, differ by sex and how disparity relates to differences in clinical activity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective review of the CMS database for payments to ophthalmologists from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2013. The dates of the analysis were February 1 through May 30, 2016. After exclusion of J and Q codes, the total payments to and the number of charges by individual ophthalmologists were analyzed. The mean values were compared using a single t test, and the medians were compared by the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcome measureswere the mean and median CMS payments to male and female ophthalmologists in outpatient, non-facility-based settings. Secondary outcome measures included the number of charges submitted by men and women and the types of charges most commonly submitted by men and women. RESULTS This study included 16 111 ophthalmologists (3078 women [19.1%] and 13 033 men [80.9%]) in 2012 and 16 179 ophthalmologists (3206 women [19.8%] and 12 973 men [80.2%]) in 2013. In 2012, the average female ophthalmologist collected $0.58 (95%CI, $0.54-$0.62; P < .001) for every dollar collected by a male ophthalmologist; comparing the medians, women collected $0.56 (95%CI, $0.50-$0.61; P < .001) for every dollar earned by men. Mean and median collections were similar when comparing female vs male ophthalmologists in 2013 (P < .001). The mean payment per charge was the same for men and women, $66 in 2012 and $64 in 2013. There was a strong association between collections and work product, with female ophthalmologists submitting fewer charges to Medicare in 2012 (median, 1120 charges; difference -935; 95%CI, -1024 to -846; P < .001) and in 2013 (median, 1141 charges; difference -937; 95%CI, -1026 to -848; P < .001) than male ophthalmologists. When corrected by comparing men and women with similar clinical activity, renumeration was still lower for women. In both years, women were underrepresented among ophthalmologists with the highest collections. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Remuneration from the CMS was disparate between male and female ophthalmologists in 2012 and 2013 because of the submission of fewer charges by women. Further studies are necessary to explore root causes for this difference, with equity in opportunity and parity in clinical activity standing to benefit the specialty.

AB - IMPORTANCE The number of women in ophthalmology is rising. Little is known about their clinical activity and collections. OBJECTIVE To examine whether charges, as reflected in reimbursements from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to ophthalmologists, differ by sex and how disparity relates to differences in clinical activity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective review of the CMS database for payments to ophthalmologists from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2013. The dates of the analysis were February 1 through May 30, 2016. After exclusion of J and Q codes, the total payments to and the number of charges by individual ophthalmologists were analyzed. The mean values were compared using a single t test, and the medians were compared by the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcome measureswere the mean and median CMS payments to male and female ophthalmologists in outpatient, non-facility-based settings. Secondary outcome measures included the number of charges submitted by men and women and the types of charges most commonly submitted by men and women. RESULTS This study included 16 111 ophthalmologists (3078 women [19.1%] and 13 033 men [80.9%]) in 2012 and 16 179 ophthalmologists (3206 women [19.8%] and 12 973 men [80.2%]) in 2013. In 2012, the average female ophthalmologist collected $0.58 (95%CI, $0.54-$0.62; P < .001) for every dollar collected by a male ophthalmologist; comparing the medians, women collected $0.56 (95%CI, $0.50-$0.61; P < .001) for every dollar earned by men. Mean and median collections were similar when comparing female vs male ophthalmologists in 2013 (P < .001). The mean payment per charge was the same for men and women, $66 in 2012 and $64 in 2013. There was a strong association between collections and work product, with female ophthalmologists submitting fewer charges to Medicare in 2012 (median, 1120 charges; difference -935; 95%CI, -1024 to -846; P < .001) and in 2013 (median, 1141 charges; difference -937; 95%CI, -1026 to -848; P < .001) than male ophthalmologists. When corrected by comparing men and women with similar clinical activity, renumeration was still lower for women. In both years, women were underrepresented among ophthalmologists with the highest collections. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Remuneration from the CMS was disparate between male and female ophthalmologists in 2012 and 2013 because of the submission of fewer charges by women. Further studies are necessary to explore root causes for this difference, with equity in opportunity and parity in clinical activity standing to benefit the specialty.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015166153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015166153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.5399

DO - 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.5399

M3 - Review article

C2 - 28114631

AN - SCOPUS:85015166153

VL - 135

SP - 205

EP - 213

JO - JAMA Ophthalmology

JF - JAMA Ophthalmology

SN - 2168-6165

IS - 3

ER -