Diaphyseal humeral fractures: treatment options.

Augusto Sarmiento, James P. Waddell, Loren L. Latta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

All of the current modalities have a place in the treatment of diaphyseal humeral fractures. Functional bracing renders a high rate of union and seems to be a safe method of treatment for most closed fractures. Type II and III open fractures seem to respond best to plate fixation or external fixation, particularly when there are associated neural or vascular pathologic findings. Patients with polytrauma who are unable to walk are also best treated with plate fixation. Plate fixation is also the best method of treatment when adequate alignment cannot be obtained with nonsurgical methods. Intramedullary nailing remains controversial because its complication rate is higher than that associated with either plate fixation or functional bracing. None of the treatments described is a panacea, and complications may occur with each one of them. An appropriate appreciation of the biologic response to the three modalities; an understanding of the indications, contraindications, and possible complications of the treatments; and a mastery of the techniques of application are essential for the attainment of satisfactory clinical results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)257-269
Number of pages13
JournalInstructional course lectures
Volume51
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

Humeral Fractures
Closed Fractures
Therapeutics
Intramedullary Fracture Fixation
Open Fractures
Multiple Trauma
Blood Vessels

Cite this

Sarmiento, A., Waddell, J. P., & Latta, L. L. (2002). Diaphyseal humeral fractures: treatment options. Instructional course lectures, 51, 257-269.

Diaphyseal humeral fractures : treatment options. / Sarmiento, Augusto; Waddell, James P.; Latta, Loren L.

In: Instructional course lectures, Vol. 51, 01.01.2002, p. 257-269.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sarmiento, A, Waddell, JP & Latta, LL 2002, 'Diaphyseal humeral fractures: treatment options.', Instructional course lectures, vol. 51, pp. 257-269.
Sarmiento A, Waddell JP, Latta LL. Diaphyseal humeral fractures: treatment options. Instructional course lectures. 2002 Jan 1;51:257-269.
Sarmiento, Augusto ; Waddell, James P. ; Latta, Loren L. / Diaphyseal humeral fractures : treatment options. In: Instructional course lectures. 2002 ; Vol. 51. pp. 257-269.
@article{03a115f2b6eb41249c49beaa7b06ead3,
title = "Diaphyseal humeral fractures: treatment options.",
abstract = "All of the current modalities have a place in the treatment of diaphyseal humeral fractures. Functional bracing renders a high rate of union and seems to be a safe method of treatment for most closed fractures. Type II and III open fractures seem to respond best to plate fixation or external fixation, particularly when there are associated neural or vascular pathologic findings. Patients with polytrauma who are unable to walk are also best treated with plate fixation. Plate fixation is also the best method of treatment when adequate alignment cannot be obtained with nonsurgical methods. Intramedullary nailing remains controversial because its complication rate is higher than that associated with either plate fixation or functional bracing. None of the treatments described is a panacea, and complications may occur with each one of them. An appropriate appreciation of the biologic response to the three modalities; an understanding of the indications, contraindications, and possible complications of the treatments; and a mastery of the techniques of application are essential for the attainment of satisfactory clinical results.",
author = "Augusto Sarmiento and Waddell, {James P.} and Latta, {Loren L.}",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "257--269",
journal = "Instructional course lectures",
issn = "0065-6895",
publisher = "American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diaphyseal humeral fractures

T2 - treatment options.

AU - Sarmiento, Augusto

AU - Waddell, James P.

AU - Latta, Loren L.

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - All of the current modalities have a place in the treatment of diaphyseal humeral fractures. Functional bracing renders a high rate of union and seems to be a safe method of treatment for most closed fractures. Type II and III open fractures seem to respond best to plate fixation or external fixation, particularly when there are associated neural or vascular pathologic findings. Patients with polytrauma who are unable to walk are also best treated with plate fixation. Plate fixation is also the best method of treatment when adequate alignment cannot be obtained with nonsurgical methods. Intramedullary nailing remains controversial because its complication rate is higher than that associated with either plate fixation or functional bracing. None of the treatments described is a panacea, and complications may occur with each one of them. An appropriate appreciation of the biologic response to the three modalities; an understanding of the indications, contraindications, and possible complications of the treatments; and a mastery of the techniques of application are essential for the attainment of satisfactory clinical results.

AB - All of the current modalities have a place in the treatment of diaphyseal humeral fractures. Functional bracing renders a high rate of union and seems to be a safe method of treatment for most closed fractures. Type II and III open fractures seem to respond best to plate fixation or external fixation, particularly when there are associated neural or vascular pathologic findings. Patients with polytrauma who are unable to walk are also best treated with plate fixation. Plate fixation is also the best method of treatment when adequate alignment cannot be obtained with nonsurgical methods. Intramedullary nailing remains controversial because its complication rate is higher than that associated with either plate fixation or functional bracing. None of the treatments described is a panacea, and complications may occur with each one of them. An appropriate appreciation of the biologic response to the three modalities; an understanding of the indications, contraindications, and possible complications of the treatments; and a mastery of the techniques of application are essential for the attainment of satisfactory clinical results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036355661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036355661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12064111

AN - SCOPUS:0036355661

VL - 51

SP - 257

EP - 269

JO - Instructional course lectures

JF - Instructional course lectures

SN - 0065-6895

ER -