Development of an instrument to measure the moral judgments of sport managers

Andrew Rudd, Susan Mullane, Sharon Stoll

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop an instrument to measure the moral judgments of sport managers called the Moral Judgments of Sport Managers Instrument (MJSMI). More specifically, our intention was to measure moral judgment on a unidimensional level given past research suggesting moral judgment is a unidimensional construct (Hahm, Beller, & Stoll, 1989; Kohlberg, 1984; Piaget, 1932; Rest, 1979, 1986). The MJSMI contains 8 moral dilemmas/stories in the context of sport management. Sport managers respond to the dilemmas on a four-point Likert scale. Three pilot studies were undertaken to develop the MJSMI. Exploratory factor analysis and internal consistency analysis were the primary methods for assaying reliability and validity. Results consistently showed that sport managers' responses vary depending on the nature of the moral scenario and thus do not indicate a unidimensional construct. The reasons for inconsistent responses are thoroughly discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)59-82
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Sport Management
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Decision Sciences(all)
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Development of an instrument to measure the moral judgments of sport managers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this