Development of a multicenter interventional cardiology database: The Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) experience

Eva Kline-Rogers, David Share, Diane Bondie, Bruce Rogers, Dean Karavite, Sherri Kanten, Patricia Wren, Cindy Bodurka, Cathy Fisk, John Mcginnity, Susan Wright, Susan Fox, Kim A. Eagle, Mauro Moscucci

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The technical challenges in the development of a quality-controlled registry of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIS) are currently unknown. This article describes the authors' experience in the development of a regional, quality-controlled PCI registry. In 1996, 16 centers in Michigan were invited to participate in a multicenter PCI registry. Nine centers agreed to a pilot data collection and, as of July 2001, eight centers are still actively collecting data. An Oracle database was developed by the coordinating center. A common data collection form and a standard set of definitions were agreed on during several meetings. Data validity was insured through review of each form by a trained nurse, by automatic database diagnostic routines, and by site visits that included a review of the catheterization laboratory logs and a review of randomly selected charts. The average number of forms requiring query resolution was 33% in 1997 (range 7-76%), and it decreased to 5% in 1999 (range 1.4-10%). The most commonly queried variables were outcomes prior to discharge, lesion category, lesion complexity, date of birth, device used, gender, postprocedural percent stenosis presence of left main disease, and MI date. Invalid dates, identification of the doctor, the presence of duplicate forms, and of duplicate outcomes were additional common queries generated by the internal diagnostic routines. In conclusion, the number of queries and diagnostic reports generated in the database suggests that the development of a quality-controlled PCI registry requires the institution of a careful diagnostic and data quality assessment system.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)387-392
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Interventional Cardiology
Volume15
Issue number5
StatePublished - Oct 1 2002

Fingerprint

Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans
Cardiology
Registries
Databases
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Catheterization
Pathologic Constriction
Nurses
Parturition
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Kline-Rogers, E., Share, D., Bondie, D., Rogers, B., Karavite, D., Kanten, S., ... Moscucci, M. (2002). Development of a multicenter interventional cardiology database: The Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) experience. Journal of Interventional Cardiology, 15(5), 387-392.

Development of a multicenter interventional cardiology database : The Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) experience. / Kline-Rogers, Eva; Share, David; Bondie, Diane; Rogers, Bruce; Karavite, Dean; Kanten, Sherri; Wren, Patricia; Bodurka, Cindy; Fisk, Cathy; Mcginnity, John; Wright, Susan; Fox, Susan; Eagle, Kim A.; Moscucci, Mauro.

In: Journal of Interventional Cardiology, Vol. 15, No. 5, 01.10.2002, p. 387-392.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kline-Rogers, E, Share, D, Bondie, D, Rogers, B, Karavite, D, Kanten, S, Wren, P, Bodurka, C, Fisk, C, Mcginnity, J, Wright, S, Fox, S, Eagle, KA & Moscucci, M 2002, 'Development of a multicenter interventional cardiology database: The Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) experience', Journal of Interventional Cardiology, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 387-392.
Kline-Rogers, Eva ; Share, David ; Bondie, Diane ; Rogers, Bruce ; Karavite, Dean ; Kanten, Sherri ; Wren, Patricia ; Bodurka, Cindy ; Fisk, Cathy ; Mcginnity, John ; Wright, Susan ; Fox, Susan ; Eagle, Kim A. ; Moscucci, Mauro. / Development of a multicenter interventional cardiology database : The Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) experience. In: Journal of Interventional Cardiology. 2002 ; Vol. 15, No. 5. pp. 387-392.
@article{c66d8c17c28e4aefa7ff2f5071bb00c5,
title = "Development of a multicenter interventional cardiology database: The Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) experience",
abstract = "The technical challenges in the development of a quality-controlled registry of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIS) are currently unknown. This article describes the authors' experience in the development of a regional, quality-controlled PCI registry. In 1996, 16 centers in Michigan were invited to participate in a multicenter PCI registry. Nine centers agreed to a pilot data collection and, as of July 2001, eight centers are still actively collecting data. An Oracle database was developed by the coordinating center. A common data collection form and a standard set of definitions were agreed on during several meetings. Data validity was insured through review of each form by a trained nurse, by automatic database diagnostic routines, and by site visits that included a review of the catheterization laboratory logs and a review of randomly selected charts. The average number of forms requiring query resolution was 33{\%} in 1997 (range 7-76{\%}), and it decreased to 5{\%} in 1999 (range 1.4-10{\%}). The most commonly queried variables were outcomes prior to discharge, lesion category, lesion complexity, date of birth, device used, gender, postprocedural percent stenosis presence of left main disease, and MI date. Invalid dates, identification of the doctor, the presence of duplicate forms, and of duplicate outcomes were additional common queries generated by the internal diagnostic routines. In conclusion, the number of queries and diagnostic reports generated in the database suggests that the development of a quality-controlled PCI registry requires the institution of a careful diagnostic and data quality assessment system.",
author = "Eva Kline-Rogers and David Share and Diane Bondie and Bruce Rogers and Dean Karavite and Sherri Kanten and Patricia Wren and Cindy Bodurka and Cathy Fisk and John Mcginnity and Susan Wright and Susan Fox and Eagle, {Kim A.} and Mauro Moscucci",
year = "2002",
month = "10",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "387--392",
journal = "Journal of Interventional Cardiology",
issn = "0896-4327",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of a multicenter interventional cardiology database

T2 - The Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) experience

AU - Kline-Rogers, Eva

AU - Share, David

AU - Bondie, Diane

AU - Rogers, Bruce

AU - Karavite, Dean

AU - Kanten, Sherri

AU - Wren, Patricia

AU - Bodurka, Cindy

AU - Fisk, Cathy

AU - Mcginnity, John

AU - Wright, Susan

AU - Fox, Susan

AU - Eagle, Kim A.

AU - Moscucci, Mauro

PY - 2002/10/1

Y1 - 2002/10/1

N2 - The technical challenges in the development of a quality-controlled registry of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIS) are currently unknown. This article describes the authors' experience in the development of a regional, quality-controlled PCI registry. In 1996, 16 centers in Michigan were invited to participate in a multicenter PCI registry. Nine centers agreed to a pilot data collection and, as of July 2001, eight centers are still actively collecting data. An Oracle database was developed by the coordinating center. A common data collection form and a standard set of definitions were agreed on during several meetings. Data validity was insured through review of each form by a trained nurse, by automatic database diagnostic routines, and by site visits that included a review of the catheterization laboratory logs and a review of randomly selected charts. The average number of forms requiring query resolution was 33% in 1997 (range 7-76%), and it decreased to 5% in 1999 (range 1.4-10%). The most commonly queried variables were outcomes prior to discharge, lesion category, lesion complexity, date of birth, device used, gender, postprocedural percent stenosis presence of left main disease, and MI date. Invalid dates, identification of the doctor, the presence of duplicate forms, and of duplicate outcomes were additional common queries generated by the internal diagnostic routines. In conclusion, the number of queries and diagnostic reports generated in the database suggests that the development of a quality-controlled PCI registry requires the institution of a careful diagnostic and data quality assessment system.

AB - The technical challenges in the development of a quality-controlled registry of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIS) are currently unknown. This article describes the authors' experience in the development of a regional, quality-controlled PCI registry. In 1996, 16 centers in Michigan were invited to participate in a multicenter PCI registry. Nine centers agreed to a pilot data collection and, as of July 2001, eight centers are still actively collecting data. An Oracle database was developed by the coordinating center. A common data collection form and a standard set of definitions were agreed on during several meetings. Data validity was insured through review of each form by a trained nurse, by automatic database diagnostic routines, and by site visits that included a review of the catheterization laboratory logs and a review of randomly selected charts. The average number of forms requiring query resolution was 33% in 1997 (range 7-76%), and it decreased to 5% in 1999 (range 1.4-10%). The most commonly queried variables were outcomes prior to discharge, lesion category, lesion complexity, date of birth, device used, gender, postprocedural percent stenosis presence of left main disease, and MI date. Invalid dates, identification of the doctor, the presence of duplicate forms, and of duplicate outcomes were additional common queries generated by the internal diagnostic routines. In conclusion, the number of queries and diagnostic reports generated in the database suggests that the development of a quality-controlled PCI registry requires the institution of a careful diagnostic and data quality assessment system.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036774473&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036774473&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12440182

AN - SCOPUS:0036774473

VL - 15

SP - 387

EP - 392

JO - Journal of Interventional Cardiology

JF - Journal of Interventional Cardiology

SN - 0896-4327

IS - 5

ER -