Developing integrated ecosystem indices

David K. Loomis, Peter B. Ortner, Christopher R. Kelble, Shona K. Paterson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Enabling ecosystem-based management requires, among other things, reaching a scientifically based consensus with respect to the key characteristics of a sustainable ecosystem capable of supporting those levels of key ecosystem services desired by society. To determine and convey whether an ecosystem is in fact approaching this goal implies developing indicators that capture the status of both the natural and societal aspects of the system. That said, developing consistent and useful indicators for both societal and natural system aspects of the ecosystem requires both resolving disparate perspectives and inconsistent terminology between human dimensions and natural system scientists and keeping the number of indicators manageably few, without oversimplifying a highly complex ecosystem. To accomplish this we employed a "recursive relationship" approach that defined (and redefined) variables, indicators, and indices along a sliding hierarchy from measurable parameters to highly aggregated indices. To illustrate this approach it is applied herein to both a human dimensions index (recreational quality), and a natural sciences index (water column). This "recursive relationship" approach facilitated development of a parsimonious set of high-level indices that together constitute an ecosystem report card integrating natural system status and related societal dimensions from an ecosystem services perspective, while maintaining all of the information at lower levels necessary to inform specific management decisions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57-62
Number of pages6
JournalEcological Indicators
Volume44
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

ecosystems
ecosystem
ecosystem services
ecosystem service
ecosystem management
terminology
sliding
index
Integrated
Ecosystem
water column
indicator
water
Human dimensions
Ecosystem services
Management decisions
Water
Ecosystem-based management
Report cards

Keywords

  • Human dimensions
  • Indices
  • Integrated ecosystem assessments
  • Interdisciplinary indicators
  • Recreational quality
  • Water column

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Decision Sciences(all)
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Loomis, D. K., Ortner, P. B., Kelble, C. R., & Paterson, S. K. (2014). Developing integrated ecosystem indices. Ecological Indicators, 44, 57-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.02.032

Developing integrated ecosystem indices. / Loomis, David K.; Ortner, Peter B.; Kelble, Christopher R.; Paterson, Shona K.

In: Ecological Indicators, Vol. 44, 01.01.2014, p. 57-62.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Loomis, DK, Ortner, PB, Kelble, CR & Paterson, SK 2014, 'Developing integrated ecosystem indices', Ecological Indicators, vol. 44, pp. 57-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.02.032
Loomis DK, Ortner PB, Kelble CR, Paterson SK. Developing integrated ecosystem indices. Ecological Indicators. 2014 Jan 1;44:57-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.02.032
Loomis, David K. ; Ortner, Peter B. ; Kelble, Christopher R. ; Paterson, Shona K. / Developing integrated ecosystem indices. In: Ecological Indicators. 2014 ; Vol. 44. pp. 57-62.
@article{c6c930ae8409443ea6c48bcc7929acb8,
title = "Developing integrated ecosystem indices",
abstract = "Enabling ecosystem-based management requires, among other things, reaching a scientifically based consensus with respect to the key characteristics of a sustainable ecosystem capable of supporting those levels of key ecosystem services desired by society. To determine and convey whether an ecosystem is in fact approaching this goal implies developing indicators that capture the status of both the natural and societal aspects of the system. That said, developing consistent and useful indicators for both societal and natural system aspects of the ecosystem requires both resolving disparate perspectives and inconsistent terminology between human dimensions and natural system scientists and keeping the number of indicators manageably few, without oversimplifying a highly complex ecosystem. To accomplish this we employed a {"}recursive relationship{"} approach that defined (and redefined) variables, indicators, and indices along a sliding hierarchy from measurable parameters to highly aggregated indices. To illustrate this approach it is applied herein to both a human dimensions index (recreational quality), and a natural sciences index (water column). This {"}recursive relationship{"} approach facilitated development of a parsimonious set of high-level indices that together constitute an ecosystem report card integrating natural system status and related societal dimensions from an ecosystem services perspective, while maintaining all of the information at lower levels necessary to inform specific management decisions.",
keywords = "Human dimensions, Indices, Integrated ecosystem assessments, Interdisciplinary indicators, Recreational quality, Water column",
author = "Loomis, {David K.} and Ortner, {Peter B.} and Kelble, {Christopher R.} and Paterson, {Shona K.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.02.032",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "57--62",
journal = "Ecological Indicators",
issn = "1470-160X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing integrated ecosystem indices

AU - Loomis, David K.

AU - Ortner, Peter B.

AU - Kelble, Christopher R.

AU - Paterson, Shona K.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Enabling ecosystem-based management requires, among other things, reaching a scientifically based consensus with respect to the key characteristics of a sustainable ecosystem capable of supporting those levels of key ecosystem services desired by society. To determine and convey whether an ecosystem is in fact approaching this goal implies developing indicators that capture the status of both the natural and societal aspects of the system. That said, developing consistent and useful indicators for both societal and natural system aspects of the ecosystem requires both resolving disparate perspectives and inconsistent terminology between human dimensions and natural system scientists and keeping the number of indicators manageably few, without oversimplifying a highly complex ecosystem. To accomplish this we employed a "recursive relationship" approach that defined (and redefined) variables, indicators, and indices along a sliding hierarchy from measurable parameters to highly aggregated indices. To illustrate this approach it is applied herein to both a human dimensions index (recreational quality), and a natural sciences index (water column). This "recursive relationship" approach facilitated development of a parsimonious set of high-level indices that together constitute an ecosystem report card integrating natural system status and related societal dimensions from an ecosystem services perspective, while maintaining all of the information at lower levels necessary to inform specific management decisions.

AB - Enabling ecosystem-based management requires, among other things, reaching a scientifically based consensus with respect to the key characteristics of a sustainable ecosystem capable of supporting those levels of key ecosystem services desired by society. To determine and convey whether an ecosystem is in fact approaching this goal implies developing indicators that capture the status of both the natural and societal aspects of the system. That said, developing consistent and useful indicators for both societal and natural system aspects of the ecosystem requires both resolving disparate perspectives and inconsistent terminology between human dimensions and natural system scientists and keeping the number of indicators manageably few, without oversimplifying a highly complex ecosystem. To accomplish this we employed a "recursive relationship" approach that defined (and redefined) variables, indicators, and indices along a sliding hierarchy from measurable parameters to highly aggregated indices. To illustrate this approach it is applied herein to both a human dimensions index (recreational quality), and a natural sciences index (water column). This "recursive relationship" approach facilitated development of a parsimonious set of high-level indices that together constitute an ecosystem report card integrating natural system status and related societal dimensions from an ecosystem services perspective, while maintaining all of the information at lower levels necessary to inform specific management decisions.

KW - Human dimensions

KW - Indices

KW - Integrated ecosystem assessments

KW - Interdisciplinary indicators

KW - Recreational quality

KW - Water column

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904741362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904741362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.02.032

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.02.032

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84904741362

VL - 44

SP - 57

EP - 62

JO - Ecological Indicators

JF - Ecological Indicators

SN - 1470-160X

ER -