Determining hominid handedness in Lithic Debitage: A review of current methodologies

Lana Ruck, Douglas C Broadfield, Clifford T. Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Handedness is inextricably linked to brain lateralization and language in humans, and identifying handedness in the paleo-archaeological record is important for understanding hominid cognitive evolution. This study reports on experiments for identifying knapper handedness in lithic debitage using three previously established methods: Toth (1985), Rugg and Mullane (2001), and Bargalló and Mosquera (2013). A blind study was conducted on lithic debitage (n = 631) from Acheulean handaxes (n = 10) created by right- and left-handed subjects. Blinded handedness predictions for flakes were compared to their true handedness in order to assess each method’s reliability. In order to test replicability, multiple observers classified a sample of flakes and inter-observer greement was assessed. None of the methods were better than chance in predictive accuracy, and there were significant issues with interobserver agreement. This study suggests that identifying knapper handedness in lithic debitage is extremely difficult, but also that some existing methodological issues may have simple solutions; suggestions for future research on this topic are provided.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)171-188
Number of pages18
JournalLithic Technology
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015

Fingerprint

methodology
brain
experiment
language
Hominids
Handedness
Methodology
Debitage
Lithics
Observer
Flake

Keywords

  • Experimental archaeology
  • Hominid cognitive evolution
  • Hominid handedness
  • Lithic analysis
  • Right shift

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Archaeology
  • Archaeology
  • Anthropology

Cite this

Determining hominid handedness in Lithic Debitage : A review of current methodologies. / Ruck, Lana; Broadfield, Douglas C; Brown, Clifford T.

In: Lithic Technology, Vol. 40, No. 3, 01.08.2015, p. 171-188.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{43145db309d54f98af6589cdbe4d1714,
title = "Determining hominid handedness in Lithic Debitage: A review of current methodologies",
abstract = "Handedness is inextricably linked to brain lateralization and language in humans, and identifying handedness in the paleo-archaeological record is important for understanding hominid cognitive evolution. This study reports on experiments for identifying knapper handedness in lithic debitage using three previously established methods: Toth (1985), Rugg and Mullane (2001), and Bargall{\'o} and Mosquera (2013). A blind study was conducted on lithic debitage (n = 631) from Acheulean handaxes (n = 10) created by right- and left-handed subjects. Blinded handedness predictions for flakes were compared to their true handedness in order to assess each method’s reliability. In order to test replicability, multiple observers classified a sample of flakes and inter-observer greement was assessed. None of the methods were better than chance in predictive accuracy, and there were significant issues with interobserver agreement. This study suggests that identifying knapper handedness in lithic debitage is extremely difficult, but also that some existing methodological issues may have simple solutions; suggestions for future research on this topic are provided.",
keywords = "Experimental archaeology, Hominid cognitive evolution, Hominid handedness, Lithic analysis, Right shift",
author = "Lana Ruck and Broadfield, {Douglas C} and Brown, {Clifford T.}",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1179/2051618515Y.0000000009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "171--188",
journal = "Lithic Technology",
issn = "0197-7261",
publisher = "Maney Publishing",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determining hominid handedness in Lithic Debitage

T2 - A review of current methodologies

AU - Ruck, Lana

AU - Broadfield, Douglas C

AU - Brown, Clifford T.

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - Handedness is inextricably linked to brain lateralization and language in humans, and identifying handedness in the paleo-archaeological record is important for understanding hominid cognitive evolution. This study reports on experiments for identifying knapper handedness in lithic debitage using three previously established methods: Toth (1985), Rugg and Mullane (2001), and Bargalló and Mosquera (2013). A blind study was conducted on lithic debitage (n = 631) from Acheulean handaxes (n = 10) created by right- and left-handed subjects. Blinded handedness predictions for flakes were compared to their true handedness in order to assess each method’s reliability. In order to test replicability, multiple observers classified a sample of flakes and inter-observer greement was assessed. None of the methods were better than chance in predictive accuracy, and there were significant issues with interobserver agreement. This study suggests that identifying knapper handedness in lithic debitage is extremely difficult, but also that some existing methodological issues may have simple solutions; suggestions for future research on this topic are provided.

AB - Handedness is inextricably linked to brain lateralization and language in humans, and identifying handedness in the paleo-archaeological record is important for understanding hominid cognitive evolution. This study reports on experiments for identifying knapper handedness in lithic debitage using three previously established methods: Toth (1985), Rugg and Mullane (2001), and Bargalló and Mosquera (2013). A blind study was conducted on lithic debitage (n = 631) from Acheulean handaxes (n = 10) created by right- and left-handed subjects. Blinded handedness predictions for flakes were compared to their true handedness in order to assess each method’s reliability. In order to test replicability, multiple observers classified a sample of flakes and inter-observer greement was assessed. None of the methods were better than chance in predictive accuracy, and there were significant issues with interobserver agreement. This study suggests that identifying knapper handedness in lithic debitage is extremely difficult, but also that some existing methodological issues may have simple solutions; suggestions for future research on this topic are provided.

KW - Experimental archaeology

KW - Hominid cognitive evolution

KW - Hominid handedness

KW - Lithic analysis

KW - Right shift

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937032294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937032294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1179/2051618515Y.0000000009

DO - 10.1179/2051618515Y.0000000009

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84937032294

VL - 40

SP - 171

EP - 188

JO - Lithic Technology

JF - Lithic Technology

SN - 0197-7261

IS - 3

ER -