Determination of lifting abilities: A comparative study of four techniques

T. M. Khalil, S. M. Waly, Shihab S Asfour, S. S. Asfour

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to test the differences among four techniques for the determination of lifting abilities. This study introduced a new submaximal isometric strength testng technique. The proposed test was based on the concept of acceptable maximum effort (AME) which is the level of static exertion the individual is willing to perform voluntarily and comfortably without over-exertion (as opposed to the maximum ability of performance). Twelve male and five female subjects underwent the protocol of the four strength testing techniques investigated: isometric maximum voluntary contraction (MCV); maximum acceptable weight (MAW); maximum dynamic lifting (MDL); and acceptable maximum effort (AME). The results showed that MAW recorded the lowest values followed by AME, then MLD, then MCV. The correlation between AME and MAW was higher than that found between MVC and MAW. Also, it was found that AME is a reproducible measure of muscular functional abilities. On the average, the coefficient of variation was less than 15% for data for both males and females. The implications of these results in determining lifting abilities are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)951-956
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Industrial Hygiene Association Journal
Volume48
Issue number12
StatePublished - Dec 1 1987

Fingerprint

Weights and Measures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Determination of lifting abilities : A comparative study of four techniques. / Khalil, T. M.; Waly, S. M.; Asfour, Shihab S; Asfour, S. S.

In: American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, Vol. 48, No. 12, 01.12.1987, p. 951-956.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c58c06826e5a4803960a7b50c5153f8a,
title = "Determination of lifting abilities: A comparative study of four techniques",
abstract = "The main objective of this study was to test the differences among four techniques for the determination of lifting abilities. This study introduced a new submaximal isometric strength testng technique. The proposed test was based on the concept of acceptable maximum effort (AME) which is the level of static exertion the individual is willing to perform voluntarily and comfortably without over-exertion (as opposed to the maximum ability of performance). Twelve male and five female subjects underwent the protocol of the four strength testing techniques investigated: isometric maximum voluntary contraction (MCV); maximum acceptable weight (MAW); maximum dynamic lifting (MDL); and acceptable maximum effort (AME). The results showed that MAW recorded the lowest values followed by AME, then MLD, then MCV. The correlation between AME and MAW was higher than that found between MVC and MAW. Also, it was found that AME is a reproducible measure of muscular functional abilities. On the average, the coefficient of variation was less than 15{\%} for data for both males and females. The implications of these results in determining lifting abilities are discussed.",
author = "Khalil, {T. M.} and Waly, {S. M.} and Asfour, {Shihab S} and Asfour, {S. S.}",
year = "1987",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "951--956",
journal = "Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene",
issn = "1545-9624",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determination of lifting abilities

T2 - A comparative study of four techniques

AU - Khalil, T. M.

AU - Waly, S. M.

AU - Asfour, Shihab S

AU - Asfour, S. S.

PY - 1987/12/1

Y1 - 1987/12/1

N2 - The main objective of this study was to test the differences among four techniques for the determination of lifting abilities. This study introduced a new submaximal isometric strength testng technique. The proposed test was based on the concept of acceptable maximum effort (AME) which is the level of static exertion the individual is willing to perform voluntarily and comfortably without over-exertion (as opposed to the maximum ability of performance). Twelve male and five female subjects underwent the protocol of the four strength testing techniques investigated: isometric maximum voluntary contraction (MCV); maximum acceptable weight (MAW); maximum dynamic lifting (MDL); and acceptable maximum effort (AME). The results showed that MAW recorded the lowest values followed by AME, then MLD, then MCV. The correlation between AME and MAW was higher than that found between MVC and MAW. Also, it was found that AME is a reproducible measure of muscular functional abilities. On the average, the coefficient of variation was less than 15% for data for both males and females. The implications of these results in determining lifting abilities are discussed.

AB - The main objective of this study was to test the differences among four techniques for the determination of lifting abilities. This study introduced a new submaximal isometric strength testng technique. The proposed test was based on the concept of acceptable maximum effort (AME) which is the level of static exertion the individual is willing to perform voluntarily and comfortably without over-exertion (as opposed to the maximum ability of performance). Twelve male and five female subjects underwent the protocol of the four strength testing techniques investigated: isometric maximum voluntary contraction (MCV); maximum acceptable weight (MAW); maximum dynamic lifting (MDL); and acceptable maximum effort (AME). The results showed that MAW recorded the lowest values followed by AME, then MLD, then MCV. The correlation between AME and MAW was higher than that found between MVC and MAW. Also, it was found that AME is a reproducible measure of muscular functional abilities. On the average, the coefficient of variation was less than 15% for data for both males and females. The implications of these results in determining lifting abilities are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023502148&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023502148&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3434537

AN - SCOPUS:0023502148

VL - 48

SP - 951

EP - 956

JO - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene

JF - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene

SN - 1545-9624

IS - 12

ER -