Detection of progressive retinal nerve fiber layer thickness loss with optical coherence tomography using 4 criteria for functional progression

Dilraj S. Grewal, Mitra Sehi, James D. Paauw, David Greenfield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the rates of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness loss using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in progressing versus nonprogressing eyes using 4 methods to define functional progression. Methods: Normal and glaucomatous eyes with ≤3 years of follow up were prospectively enrolled. Standard automated perimetry (Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm Standard 24-2) and OCT (Stratus OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) imaging were performed every 6 months in glaucomatous eyes. OCT imaging was performed annually in normal eyes. Functional progression was determined using early manifest glaucoma trial criterion, visual field index (VFI), Progressor software, and the 3-omitting method. Results: Seventy-six eyes (46 glaucoma and 30 normal) of 38 patients were enrolled with a mean follow-up of 43.9±5.02 months (range: 36 to 48 mo). Eleven eyes progressed using Progressor criterion, 5 eyes using VFI, 2 eyes using the 3-omitting method, and 2 eyes using Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial criterion. The annual rate of average RNFL loss (μm/y) was significantly greater (P<0.05) in progressing versus nonprogressing eyes using Progressor (-1.0±1.3 vs. 0.02±1.6), VFI (-2.1±1.1 vs. -0.002±1.4), and the 3-omitting method (-2.2±0.2 vs. -0.1±1.5). Mean rate (μm/y) of average and superior RNFL thickness change was similar (P>0.05) in nonprogressing glaucomatous eyes compared with normal eyes. Using linear mixed-effect models, mean (P<0.001) and peak (P=0.01) intraocular pressure were significantly associated with rate of average RNFL atrophy in glaucomatous eyes. Conclusions: Despite differences in criteria used to judge functional progression, eyes with standard automated perimetry progression have significantly greater rates of RNFL loss measured using OCT compared with nonprogressing eyes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)214-220
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Glaucoma
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2012

Fingerprint

Optical Coherence Tomography
Nerve Fibers
Glaucoma
Visual Field Tests
Visual Fields
Intraocular Pressure
Atrophy
Software

Keywords

  • glaucoma progression
  • optical coherence tomography
  • retinal nerve fiber layer thickness
  • standard automated perimetry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Detection of progressive retinal nerve fiber layer thickness loss with optical coherence tomography using 4 criteria for functional progression. / Grewal, Dilraj S.; Sehi, Mitra; Paauw, James D.; Greenfield, David.

In: Journal of Glaucoma, Vol. 21, No. 4, 01.04.2012, p. 214-220.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c585ce6d3f8046f9ad22ef900fe6381c,
title = "Detection of progressive retinal nerve fiber layer thickness loss with optical coherence tomography using 4 criteria for functional progression",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare the rates of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness loss using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in progressing versus nonprogressing eyes using 4 methods to define functional progression. Methods: Normal and glaucomatous eyes with ≤3 years of follow up were prospectively enrolled. Standard automated perimetry (Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm Standard 24-2) and OCT (Stratus OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) imaging were performed every 6 months in glaucomatous eyes. OCT imaging was performed annually in normal eyes. Functional progression was determined using early manifest glaucoma trial criterion, visual field index (VFI), Progressor software, and the 3-omitting method. Results: Seventy-six eyes (46 glaucoma and 30 normal) of 38 patients were enrolled with a mean follow-up of 43.9±5.02 months (range: 36 to 48 mo). Eleven eyes progressed using Progressor criterion, 5 eyes using VFI, 2 eyes using the 3-omitting method, and 2 eyes using Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial criterion. The annual rate of average RNFL loss (μm/y) was significantly greater (P<0.05) in progressing versus nonprogressing eyes using Progressor (-1.0±1.3 vs. 0.02±1.6), VFI (-2.1±1.1 vs. -0.002±1.4), and the 3-omitting method (-2.2±0.2 vs. -0.1±1.5). Mean rate (μm/y) of average and superior RNFL thickness change was similar (P>0.05) in nonprogressing glaucomatous eyes compared with normal eyes. Using linear mixed-effect models, mean (P<0.001) and peak (P=0.01) intraocular pressure were significantly associated with rate of average RNFL atrophy in glaucomatous eyes. Conclusions: Despite differences in criteria used to judge functional progression, eyes with standard automated perimetry progression have significantly greater rates of RNFL loss measured using OCT compared with nonprogressing eyes.",
keywords = "glaucoma progression, optical coherence tomography, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, standard automated perimetry",
author = "Grewal, {Dilraj S.} and Mitra Sehi and Paauw, {James D.} and David Greenfield",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182071cc7",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "214--220",
journal = "Journal of Glaucoma",
issn = "1057-0829",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detection of progressive retinal nerve fiber layer thickness loss with optical coherence tomography using 4 criteria for functional progression

AU - Grewal, Dilraj S.

AU - Sehi, Mitra

AU - Paauw, James D.

AU - Greenfield, David

PY - 2012/4/1

Y1 - 2012/4/1

N2 - Purpose: To compare the rates of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness loss using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in progressing versus nonprogressing eyes using 4 methods to define functional progression. Methods: Normal and glaucomatous eyes with ≤3 years of follow up were prospectively enrolled. Standard automated perimetry (Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm Standard 24-2) and OCT (Stratus OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) imaging were performed every 6 months in glaucomatous eyes. OCT imaging was performed annually in normal eyes. Functional progression was determined using early manifest glaucoma trial criterion, visual field index (VFI), Progressor software, and the 3-omitting method. Results: Seventy-six eyes (46 glaucoma and 30 normal) of 38 patients were enrolled with a mean follow-up of 43.9±5.02 months (range: 36 to 48 mo). Eleven eyes progressed using Progressor criterion, 5 eyes using VFI, 2 eyes using the 3-omitting method, and 2 eyes using Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial criterion. The annual rate of average RNFL loss (μm/y) was significantly greater (P<0.05) in progressing versus nonprogressing eyes using Progressor (-1.0±1.3 vs. 0.02±1.6), VFI (-2.1±1.1 vs. -0.002±1.4), and the 3-omitting method (-2.2±0.2 vs. -0.1±1.5). Mean rate (μm/y) of average and superior RNFL thickness change was similar (P>0.05) in nonprogressing glaucomatous eyes compared with normal eyes. Using linear mixed-effect models, mean (P<0.001) and peak (P=0.01) intraocular pressure were significantly associated with rate of average RNFL atrophy in glaucomatous eyes. Conclusions: Despite differences in criteria used to judge functional progression, eyes with standard automated perimetry progression have significantly greater rates of RNFL loss measured using OCT compared with nonprogressing eyes.

AB - Purpose: To compare the rates of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness loss using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in progressing versus nonprogressing eyes using 4 methods to define functional progression. Methods: Normal and glaucomatous eyes with ≤3 years of follow up were prospectively enrolled. Standard automated perimetry (Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm Standard 24-2) and OCT (Stratus OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) imaging were performed every 6 months in glaucomatous eyes. OCT imaging was performed annually in normal eyes. Functional progression was determined using early manifest glaucoma trial criterion, visual field index (VFI), Progressor software, and the 3-omitting method. Results: Seventy-six eyes (46 glaucoma and 30 normal) of 38 patients were enrolled with a mean follow-up of 43.9±5.02 months (range: 36 to 48 mo). Eleven eyes progressed using Progressor criterion, 5 eyes using VFI, 2 eyes using the 3-omitting method, and 2 eyes using Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial criterion. The annual rate of average RNFL loss (μm/y) was significantly greater (P<0.05) in progressing versus nonprogressing eyes using Progressor (-1.0±1.3 vs. 0.02±1.6), VFI (-2.1±1.1 vs. -0.002±1.4), and the 3-omitting method (-2.2±0.2 vs. -0.1±1.5). Mean rate (μm/y) of average and superior RNFL thickness change was similar (P>0.05) in nonprogressing glaucomatous eyes compared with normal eyes. Using linear mixed-effect models, mean (P<0.001) and peak (P=0.01) intraocular pressure were significantly associated with rate of average RNFL atrophy in glaucomatous eyes. Conclusions: Despite differences in criteria used to judge functional progression, eyes with standard automated perimetry progression have significantly greater rates of RNFL loss measured using OCT compared with nonprogressing eyes.

KW - glaucoma progression

KW - optical coherence tomography

KW - retinal nerve fiber layer thickness

KW - standard automated perimetry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859422301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859422301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182071cc7

DO - 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182071cc7

M3 - Article

C2 - 21654510

AN - SCOPUS:84859422301

VL - 21

SP - 214

EP - 220

JO - Journal of Glaucoma

JF - Journal of Glaucoma

SN - 1057-0829

IS - 4

ER -