Design, development, and evaluation of printed educational materials for evidence-based practice dissemination

Jessica Williams, Lizbeth E. Caceda-Castro, Tracy Dusablon, Melissa Stipa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: Printed educational materials (PEMs) are one of the most common dissemination strategies for communicating information about evidence-based practices (EBPs) to healthcare professionals and organizations; however, evidence is conflicting regarding the conditions and circumstances in which PEMs are effective in achieving desired outcomes. The effectiveness of PEMs is largely dependent on the manner in which they are developed. This article reports on the findings from a comprehensive review of the literature regarding best practices for creating PEMs for health professionals and illustrates how these practices were used to design, develop, and evaluate an informational packet to disseminate information about motivational interviewing. Methods: The informational packet was disseminated to 92 community health organizations not currently implementing motivational interviewing. Evaluation surveys were completed by 212 healthcare directors and providers to examine quality and perceived helpfulness of the packets, intention to use information from the packet, and sharing of the packet with others. Associations between these and individual and organizational characteristics were also assessed. Results: Overall, the packet was perceived as appropriate and helpful in making a decision to implement motivational interviewing. For example, 84.9% of participants stated that the content was 'about right'. Threequarters (75.9%) of participants reported plans to use the information in the packet and almost half (46.7%) reported talking about the packet with others in the organizations. Higher levels of baseline interest in motivational interviewing adoption were significantly related to packet use and wanting to utilize additional resources presented in the packet. Positive attitudes toward EBPs were also significantly related to the desire to obtain resources in the packet. Perceptions of the packet did not differ by type of community health organization (i.e., community health center, community behavioral health organization) or whether the individual was a director or provider. Conclusion: Results indicated that PEMs can be a useful tool to disseminate EBP information to healthcare professionals particularly if they have a prior interest in the EBP and have general attitudes supportive of EBPs. Recommendations for the improvement of future PEMs are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)84-94
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Practice
Motivational Interviewing
Organizations
Health
Delivery of Health Care
Community Health Centers
Professional Practice
Information Dissemination
Practice Guidelines
Health Personnel
Decision Making

Keywords

  • Behavioral health
  • Community health organizations
  • Dissemination
  • Evidence-based practice
  • Printed educational materials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Design, development, and evaluation of printed educational materials for evidence-based practice dissemination. / Williams, Jessica; Caceda-Castro, Lizbeth E.; Dusablon, Tracy; Stipa, Melissa.

In: International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, Vol. 14, No. 2, 01.06.2016, p. 84-94.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Williams, Jessica ; Caceda-Castro, Lizbeth E. ; Dusablon, Tracy ; Stipa, Melissa. / Design, development, and evaluation of printed educational materials for evidence-based practice dissemination. In: International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare. 2016 ; Vol. 14, No. 2. pp. 84-94.
@article{0fa303897f0a404db6fb9761228560f5,
title = "Design, development, and evaluation of printed educational materials for evidence-based practice dissemination",
abstract = "Aim: Printed educational materials (PEMs) are one of the most common dissemination strategies for communicating information about evidence-based practices (EBPs) to healthcare professionals and organizations; however, evidence is conflicting regarding the conditions and circumstances in which PEMs are effective in achieving desired outcomes. The effectiveness of PEMs is largely dependent on the manner in which they are developed. This article reports on the findings from a comprehensive review of the literature regarding best practices for creating PEMs for health professionals and illustrates how these practices were used to design, develop, and evaluate an informational packet to disseminate information about motivational interviewing. Methods: The informational packet was disseminated to 92 community health organizations not currently implementing motivational interviewing. Evaluation surveys were completed by 212 healthcare directors and providers to examine quality and perceived helpfulness of the packets, intention to use information from the packet, and sharing of the packet with others. Associations between these and individual and organizational characteristics were also assessed. Results: Overall, the packet was perceived as appropriate and helpful in making a decision to implement motivational interviewing. For example, 84.9{\%} of participants stated that the content was 'about right'. Threequarters (75.9{\%}) of participants reported plans to use the information in the packet and almost half (46.7{\%}) reported talking about the packet with others in the organizations. Higher levels of baseline interest in motivational interviewing adoption were significantly related to packet use and wanting to utilize additional resources presented in the packet. Positive attitudes toward EBPs were also significantly related to the desire to obtain resources in the packet. Perceptions of the packet did not differ by type of community health organization (i.e., community health center, community behavioral health organization) or whether the individual was a director or provider. Conclusion: Results indicated that PEMs can be a useful tool to disseminate EBP information to healthcare professionals particularly if they have a prior interest in the EBP and have general attitudes supportive of EBPs. Recommendations for the improvement of future PEMs are discussed.",
keywords = "Behavioral health, Community health organizations, Dissemination, Evidence-based practice, Printed educational materials",
author = "Jessica Williams and Caceda-Castro, {Lizbeth E.} and Tracy Dusablon and Melissa Stipa",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/XEB.0000000000000072",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "84--94",
journal = "International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare",
issn = "1744-1595",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Design, development, and evaluation of printed educational materials for evidence-based practice dissemination

AU - Williams, Jessica

AU - Caceda-Castro, Lizbeth E.

AU - Dusablon, Tracy

AU - Stipa, Melissa

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Aim: Printed educational materials (PEMs) are one of the most common dissemination strategies for communicating information about evidence-based practices (EBPs) to healthcare professionals and organizations; however, evidence is conflicting regarding the conditions and circumstances in which PEMs are effective in achieving desired outcomes. The effectiveness of PEMs is largely dependent on the manner in which they are developed. This article reports on the findings from a comprehensive review of the literature regarding best practices for creating PEMs for health professionals and illustrates how these practices were used to design, develop, and evaluate an informational packet to disseminate information about motivational interviewing. Methods: The informational packet was disseminated to 92 community health organizations not currently implementing motivational interviewing. Evaluation surveys were completed by 212 healthcare directors and providers to examine quality and perceived helpfulness of the packets, intention to use information from the packet, and sharing of the packet with others. Associations between these and individual and organizational characteristics were also assessed. Results: Overall, the packet was perceived as appropriate and helpful in making a decision to implement motivational interviewing. For example, 84.9% of participants stated that the content was 'about right'. Threequarters (75.9%) of participants reported plans to use the information in the packet and almost half (46.7%) reported talking about the packet with others in the organizations. Higher levels of baseline interest in motivational interviewing adoption were significantly related to packet use and wanting to utilize additional resources presented in the packet. Positive attitudes toward EBPs were also significantly related to the desire to obtain resources in the packet. Perceptions of the packet did not differ by type of community health organization (i.e., community health center, community behavioral health organization) or whether the individual was a director or provider. Conclusion: Results indicated that PEMs can be a useful tool to disseminate EBP information to healthcare professionals particularly if they have a prior interest in the EBP and have general attitudes supportive of EBPs. Recommendations for the improvement of future PEMs are discussed.

AB - Aim: Printed educational materials (PEMs) are one of the most common dissemination strategies for communicating information about evidence-based practices (EBPs) to healthcare professionals and organizations; however, evidence is conflicting regarding the conditions and circumstances in which PEMs are effective in achieving desired outcomes. The effectiveness of PEMs is largely dependent on the manner in which they are developed. This article reports on the findings from a comprehensive review of the literature regarding best practices for creating PEMs for health professionals and illustrates how these practices were used to design, develop, and evaluate an informational packet to disseminate information about motivational interviewing. Methods: The informational packet was disseminated to 92 community health organizations not currently implementing motivational interviewing. Evaluation surveys were completed by 212 healthcare directors and providers to examine quality and perceived helpfulness of the packets, intention to use information from the packet, and sharing of the packet with others. Associations between these and individual and organizational characteristics were also assessed. Results: Overall, the packet was perceived as appropriate and helpful in making a decision to implement motivational interviewing. For example, 84.9% of participants stated that the content was 'about right'. Threequarters (75.9%) of participants reported plans to use the information in the packet and almost half (46.7%) reported talking about the packet with others in the organizations. Higher levels of baseline interest in motivational interviewing adoption were significantly related to packet use and wanting to utilize additional resources presented in the packet. Positive attitudes toward EBPs were also significantly related to the desire to obtain resources in the packet. Perceptions of the packet did not differ by type of community health organization (i.e., community health center, community behavioral health organization) or whether the individual was a director or provider. Conclusion: Results indicated that PEMs can be a useful tool to disseminate EBP information to healthcare professionals particularly if they have a prior interest in the EBP and have general attitudes supportive of EBPs. Recommendations for the improvement of future PEMs are discussed.

KW - Behavioral health

KW - Community health organizations

KW - Dissemination

KW - Evidence-based practice

KW - Printed educational materials

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975295247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84975295247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000072

DO - 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000072

M3 - Article

C2 - 26735568

AN - SCOPUS:84975295247

VL - 14

SP - 84

EP - 94

JO - International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare

JF - International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare

SN - 1744-1595

IS - 2

ER -