Depression and risk for Alzheimer disease: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and metaregression analysis

Raymond L. Ownby, Elizabeth Crocco, Amarilis Acevedo, Vineeth John, David Loewenstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

789 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: A history of depression may increase risk for developing Alzheimer disease (AD) later in life. Clarifying this relation might improve understanding of risk factors for and disease mechanisms in AD. Objective: To systematically review and complete a meta-analysis on the relation of depression and AD. Data Sources: We conducted electronic bibliographic searches of MEDLINE, PsychLit, EMBASE, and BIOSIS using search terms sensitive to studies of etiology combined with searches on terms related to depression and AD and reviewed reference lists of articles. Study Selection: Studies with data contrasting depressed vs nondepressed patients who did and did not later develop AD were included. Studies that related continuous measures of depression and cognitive status were excluded. Data Extraction: Numerical data were independently extracted by 3 reviewers. They also rated studies on a scale that assessed quality indicators for observational studies. Data on the interval between observation of depression and the diagnosis of AD were collected when available. Data Synthesis: Meta-analytic evaluation with randomeffects models resulted in pooled odds ratios of 2.03 (95% confidence interval, 1.73-2.38) for case-control and of 1.90 (95% confidence interval, 1.55-2.33) for cohort studies. Findings of increased risk were robust to sensitivity analyses. Interval between diagnoses of depression and AD was positively related to increased risk of developing AD, suggesting that rather than a prodrome, depression may be a risk factor for AD. Conclusions: A history of depression may confer an increased risk for later developing AD. This relation may reflect an independent risk factor for the disease.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)530-538
Number of pages9
JournalArchives of General Psychiatry
Volume63
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2006

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Alzheimer Disease
Depression
Confidence Intervals
Information Storage and Retrieval
MEDLINE
Observational Studies
Cohort Studies
Odds Ratio
Observation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Depression and risk for Alzheimer disease : Systematic review, meta-analysis, and metaregression analysis. / Ownby, Raymond L.; Crocco, Elizabeth; Acevedo, Amarilis; John, Vineeth; Loewenstein, David.

In: Archives of General Psychiatry, Vol. 63, No. 5, 01.12.2006, p. 530-538.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{736801a5ca8d464b8ce56bd5c46a9cf6,
title = "Depression and risk for Alzheimer disease: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and metaregression analysis",
abstract = "Context: A history of depression may increase risk for developing Alzheimer disease (AD) later in life. Clarifying this relation might improve understanding of risk factors for and disease mechanisms in AD. Objective: To systematically review and complete a meta-analysis on the relation of depression and AD. Data Sources: We conducted electronic bibliographic searches of MEDLINE, PsychLit, EMBASE, and BIOSIS using search terms sensitive to studies of etiology combined with searches on terms related to depression and AD and reviewed reference lists of articles. Study Selection: Studies with data contrasting depressed vs nondepressed patients who did and did not later develop AD were included. Studies that related continuous measures of depression and cognitive status were excluded. Data Extraction: Numerical data were independently extracted by 3 reviewers. They also rated studies on a scale that assessed quality indicators for observational studies. Data on the interval between observation of depression and the diagnosis of AD were collected when available. Data Synthesis: Meta-analytic evaluation with randomeffects models resulted in pooled odds ratios of 2.03 (95{\%} confidence interval, 1.73-2.38) for case-control and of 1.90 (95{\%} confidence interval, 1.55-2.33) for cohort studies. Findings of increased risk were robust to sensitivity analyses. Interval between diagnoses of depression and AD was positively related to increased risk of developing AD, suggesting that rather than a prodrome, depression may be a risk factor for AD. Conclusions: A history of depression may confer an increased risk for later developing AD. This relation may reflect an independent risk factor for the disease.",
author = "Ownby, {Raymond L.} and Elizabeth Crocco and Amarilis Acevedo and Vineeth John and David Loewenstein",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/archpsyc.63.5.530",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "530--538",
journal = "JAMA Psychiatry",
issn = "2168-622X",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Depression and risk for Alzheimer disease

T2 - Systematic review, meta-analysis, and metaregression analysis

AU - Ownby, Raymond L.

AU - Crocco, Elizabeth

AU - Acevedo, Amarilis

AU - John, Vineeth

AU - Loewenstein, David

PY - 2006/12/1

Y1 - 2006/12/1

N2 - Context: A history of depression may increase risk for developing Alzheimer disease (AD) later in life. Clarifying this relation might improve understanding of risk factors for and disease mechanisms in AD. Objective: To systematically review and complete a meta-analysis on the relation of depression and AD. Data Sources: We conducted electronic bibliographic searches of MEDLINE, PsychLit, EMBASE, and BIOSIS using search terms sensitive to studies of etiology combined with searches on terms related to depression and AD and reviewed reference lists of articles. Study Selection: Studies with data contrasting depressed vs nondepressed patients who did and did not later develop AD were included. Studies that related continuous measures of depression and cognitive status were excluded. Data Extraction: Numerical data were independently extracted by 3 reviewers. They also rated studies on a scale that assessed quality indicators for observational studies. Data on the interval between observation of depression and the diagnosis of AD were collected when available. Data Synthesis: Meta-analytic evaluation with randomeffects models resulted in pooled odds ratios of 2.03 (95% confidence interval, 1.73-2.38) for case-control and of 1.90 (95% confidence interval, 1.55-2.33) for cohort studies. Findings of increased risk were robust to sensitivity analyses. Interval between diagnoses of depression and AD was positively related to increased risk of developing AD, suggesting that rather than a prodrome, depression may be a risk factor for AD. Conclusions: A history of depression may confer an increased risk for later developing AD. This relation may reflect an independent risk factor for the disease.

AB - Context: A history of depression may increase risk for developing Alzheimer disease (AD) later in life. Clarifying this relation might improve understanding of risk factors for and disease mechanisms in AD. Objective: To systematically review and complete a meta-analysis on the relation of depression and AD. Data Sources: We conducted electronic bibliographic searches of MEDLINE, PsychLit, EMBASE, and BIOSIS using search terms sensitive to studies of etiology combined with searches on terms related to depression and AD and reviewed reference lists of articles. Study Selection: Studies with data contrasting depressed vs nondepressed patients who did and did not later develop AD were included. Studies that related continuous measures of depression and cognitive status were excluded. Data Extraction: Numerical data were independently extracted by 3 reviewers. They also rated studies on a scale that assessed quality indicators for observational studies. Data on the interval between observation of depression and the diagnosis of AD were collected when available. Data Synthesis: Meta-analytic evaluation with randomeffects models resulted in pooled odds ratios of 2.03 (95% confidence interval, 1.73-2.38) for case-control and of 1.90 (95% confidence interval, 1.55-2.33) for cohort studies. Findings of increased risk were robust to sensitivity analyses. Interval between diagnoses of depression and AD was positively related to increased risk of developing AD, suggesting that rather than a prodrome, depression may be a risk factor for AD. Conclusions: A history of depression may confer an increased risk for later developing AD. This relation may reflect an independent risk factor for the disease.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646923143&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646923143&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archpsyc.63.5.530

DO - 10.1001/archpsyc.63.5.530

M3 - Article

C2 - 16651510

AN - SCOPUS:33646923143

VL - 63

SP - 530

EP - 538

JO - JAMA Psychiatry

JF - JAMA Psychiatry

SN - 2168-622X

IS - 5

ER -