Degradation of ribosomal RNA during starvation

Comparison to quality control during steady-state growth and a role for RNase PH

Georgeta N. Basturea, Michael A. Zundel, Murray P Deutscher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ribosomal RNAs are generally stable in growing Escherichia coli cells. However, their degradation increases dramatically under conditions that lead to slow cell growth. In addition, incomplete RNA molecules and molecules with defects in processing, folding, or assembly are also eliminated in growing cells in a process termed quality control. Here, we show that there are significant differences between the pathways of ribosomal RNA degradation during glucose starvation and quality control during steady-state growth. In both processes, endonucleolytic cleavage of rRNA in ribosome subunits is an early step, resulting in accumulation of large rRNA fragments when the processive exoribonucleases, RNase II, RNase R, and PNPase are absent. For 23S rRNA, cleavage is in the region of helix 71, but the exact position can differ in the two degradative processes. For 16S rRNA, degradation during starvation begins with shortening of its 3′ end in a reaction catalyzed by RNase PH. In the absence of this RNase, there is no 3′ end trimming of 16S rRNA and no accumulation of rRNA fragments, and total RNA degradation is greatly reduced. In contrast, the degradation pattern in quality control remains unchanged when RNase PH is absent. During starvation, the exoribonucleases RNase II and RNase R are important for fragment removal, whereas for quality control, RNase R and PNPase are more important. These data highlight the similarities and differences between rRNA degradation during starvation and quality control during steady-state growth and describe a role for RNase PH in the starvation degradative pathway. Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)338-345
Number of pages8
JournalRNA
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2011

Fingerprint

Ribosomal RNA
Starvation
Quality Control
Growth
RNA Stability
Ribosome Subunits
Ribonucleases
ribonuclease PH
RNA
Escherichia coli
Glucose
exoribonuclease II
ribonuclease R

Keywords

  • Escherichia coli
  • Ribonuclease
  • Ribosome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Biology

Cite this

Degradation of ribosomal RNA during starvation : Comparison to quality control during steady-state growth and a role for RNase PH. / Basturea, Georgeta N.; Zundel, Michael A.; Deutscher, Murray P.

In: RNA, Vol. 17, No. 2, 01.02.2011, p. 338-345.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Basturea, Georgeta N. ; Zundel, Michael A. ; Deutscher, Murray P. / Degradation of ribosomal RNA during starvation : Comparison to quality control during steady-state growth and a role for RNase PH. In: RNA. 2011 ; Vol. 17, No. 2. pp. 338-345.
@article{b62cb99b681242158de214480d0ecb8a,
title = "Degradation of ribosomal RNA during starvation: Comparison to quality control during steady-state growth and a role for RNase PH",
abstract = "Ribosomal RNAs are generally stable in growing Escherichia coli cells. However, their degradation increases dramatically under conditions that lead to slow cell growth. In addition, incomplete RNA molecules and molecules with defects in processing, folding, or assembly are also eliminated in growing cells in a process termed quality control. Here, we show that there are significant differences between the pathways of ribosomal RNA degradation during glucose starvation and quality control during steady-state growth. In both processes, endonucleolytic cleavage of rRNA in ribosome subunits is an early step, resulting in accumulation of large rRNA fragments when the processive exoribonucleases, RNase II, RNase R, and PNPase are absent. For 23S rRNA, cleavage is in the region of helix 71, but the exact position can differ in the two degradative processes. For 16S rRNA, degradation during starvation begins with shortening of its 3′ end in a reaction catalyzed by RNase PH. In the absence of this RNase, there is no 3′ end trimming of 16S rRNA and no accumulation of rRNA fragments, and total RNA degradation is greatly reduced. In contrast, the degradation pattern in quality control remains unchanged when RNase PH is absent. During starvation, the exoribonucleases RNase II and RNase R are important for fragment removal, whereas for quality control, RNase R and PNPase are more important. These data highlight the similarities and differences between rRNA degradation during starvation and quality control during steady-state growth and describe a role for RNase PH in the starvation degradative pathway. Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.",
keywords = "Escherichia coli, Ribonuclease, Ribosome",
author = "Basturea, {Georgeta N.} and Zundel, {Michael A.} and Deutscher, {Murray P}",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1261/rna.2448911",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "338--345",
journal = "RNA",
issn = "1355-8382",
publisher = "Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Degradation of ribosomal RNA during starvation

T2 - Comparison to quality control during steady-state growth and a role for RNase PH

AU - Basturea, Georgeta N.

AU - Zundel, Michael A.

AU - Deutscher, Murray P

PY - 2011/2/1

Y1 - 2011/2/1

N2 - Ribosomal RNAs are generally stable in growing Escherichia coli cells. However, their degradation increases dramatically under conditions that lead to slow cell growth. In addition, incomplete RNA molecules and molecules with defects in processing, folding, or assembly are also eliminated in growing cells in a process termed quality control. Here, we show that there are significant differences between the pathways of ribosomal RNA degradation during glucose starvation and quality control during steady-state growth. In both processes, endonucleolytic cleavage of rRNA in ribosome subunits is an early step, resulting in accumulation of large rRNA fragments when the processive exoribonucleases, RNase II, RNase R, and PNPase are absent. For 23S rRNA, cleavage is in the region of helix 71, but the exact position can differ in the two degradative processes. For 16S rRNA, degradation during starvation begins with shortening of its 3′ end in a reaction catalyzed by RNase PH. In the absence of this RNase, there is no 3′ end trimming of 16S rRNA and no accumulation of rRNA fragments, and total RNA degradation is greatly reduced. In contrast, the degradation pattern in quality control remains unchanged when RNase PH is absent. During starvation, the exoribonucleases RNase II and RNase R are important for fragment removal, whereas for quality control, RNase R and PNPase are more important. These data highlight the similarities and differences between rRNA degradation during starvation and quality control during steady-state growth and describe a role for RNase PH in the starvation degradative pathway. Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

AB - Ribosomal RNAs are generally stable in growing Escherichia coli cells. However, their degradation increases dramatically under conditions that lead to slow cell growth. In addition, incomplete RNA molecules and molecules with defects in processing, folding, or assembly are also eliminated in growing cells in a process termed quality control. Here, we show that there are significant differences between the pathways of ribosomal RNA degradation during glucose starvation and quality control during steady-state growth. In both processes, endonucleolytic cleavage of rRNA in ribosome subunits is an early step, resulting in accumulation of large rRNA fragments when the processive exoribonucleases, RNase II, RNase R, and PNPase are absent. For 23S rRNA, cleavage is in the region of helix 71, but the exact position can differ in the two degradative processes. For 16S rRNA, degradation during starvation begins with shortening of its 3′ end in a reaction catalyzed by RNase PH. In the absence of this RNase, there is no 3′ end trimming of 16S rRNA and no accumulation of rRNA fragments, and total RNA degradation is greatly reduced. In contrast, the degradation pattern in quality control remains unchanged when RNase PH is absent. During starvation, the exoribonucleases RNase II and RNase R are important for fragment removal, whereas for quality control, RNase R and PNPase are more important. These data highlight the similarities and differences between rRNA degradation during starvation and quality control during steady-state growth and describe a role for RNase PH in the starvation degradative pathway. Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

KW - Escherichia coli

KW - Ribonuclease

KW - Ribosome

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78751468963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78751468963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1261/rna.2448911

DO - 10.1261/rna.2448911

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 338

EP - 345

JO - RNA

JF - RNA

SN - 1355-8382

IS - 2

ER -