Defining and treating the spectrum of intermediate risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer

Ashish M. Kamat, J. Alfred Witjes, Maurizio Brausi, Mark Soloway, Donald Lamm, Raj Persad, Roger Buckley, Andreas Böhle, Marc Colombel, Joan Palou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose Low, intermediate and high risk categories have been defined to help guide the treatment of patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (Ta, T1, CIS). However, while low and high risk disease has been well classified, the intermediate risk category has traditionally comprised a heterogeneous group that does not fit into either of these categories. As a result, many urologists remain uncertain about the categorization of patients as intermediate risk as well as the selection of the most appropriate therapeutic option for this patient population. We review the current literature and clinical practice guidelines on intermediate risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer and, based on our findings, provide urologists with a better understanding of this heterogeneous risk group as well as practical recommendations for the treatment of intermediate risk patients. Materials and Methods The IBCG analyzed published clinical trials, meta-analyses and current clinical practice guidelines on intermediate risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer available as of September 2013. The definitions of intermediate risk, patient outcomes and guideline recommendations were considered, as were the limitations of the available literature and additional parameters that may be useful in guiding treatment decisions in intermediate risk patients. Results Current definitions and management recommendations for intermediate risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer vary. The most simple and practical definition is that proposed by the IBCG and the AUA of multiple and/or recurrent low grade Ta tumors. The IBCG suggests that several factors should be considered in clinical decisions in intermediate risk disease, including number (greater than 1) and size (greater than 3 cm) of tumors, timing (recurrence within 1 year) and frequency (more than 1 per year) of recurrence, and previous treatment. In patients without these risk factors a single, immediate instillation of chemotherapy is advised. In those with 1 to 2 risk factors adjuvant intravesical therapy (intravesical chemotherapy or maintenance bacillus Calmette-Guérin) is recommended, and previous intravesical therapy should be considered when choosing between these adjuvant therapies. For those patients with 3 to 4 risk factors, maintenance bacillus Calmette-Guérin is recommended. It is also important that all intermediate risk patients are accurately risk stratified at initial diagnosis and during subsequent followup. This requires appropriate transurethral resection of the bladder tumor, vigilance to rule out carcinoma in situ or other potential high risk tumors, and review of histological material directly with the pathologist. Conclusions Intermediate risk disease is a heterogeneous category, and there is a paucity of independent studies comparing therapies and outcomes in subgroups of intermediate risk patients. The IBCG has proposed a management algorithm that considers tumor characteristics, timing and frequency of recurrence, and previous treatment. Subgroup analyses of intermediate risk subjects in pivotal EORTC trials and meta-analyses will be important to validate the proposed algorithm and support clear evidence-based recommendations for subgroups of intermediate risk patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)305-315
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume192
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
Therapeutics
Practice Guidelines
Recurrence
Bacillus
Meta-Analysis
Neoplasms
Maintenance
Drug Therapy
Carcinoma in Situ

Keywords

  • adjuvant
  • administration
  • chemotherapy
  • intravesical
  • mycobacterium bovis
  • risk
  • urinary bladder neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Kamat, A. M., Witjes, J. A., Brausi, M., Soloway, M., Lamm, D., Persad, R., ... Palou, J. (2014). Defining and treating the spectrum of intermediate risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. Journal of Urology, 192(2), 305-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.2573

Defining and treating the spectrum of intermediate risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. / Kamat, Ashish M.; Witjes, J. Alfred; Brausi, Maurizio; Soloway, Mark; Lamm, Donald; Persad, Raj; Buckley, Roger; Böhle, Andreas; Colombel, Marc; Palou, Joan.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 192, No. 2, 01.01.2014, p. 305-315.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kamat, AM, Witjes, JA, Brausi, M, Soloway, M, Lamm, D, Persad, R, Buckley, R, Böhle, A, Colombel, M & Palou, J 2014, 'Defining and treating the spectrum of intermediate risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer', Journal of Urology, vol. 192, no. 2, pp. 305-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.2573
Kamat, Ashish M. ; Witjes, J. Alfred ; Brausi, Maurizio ; Soloway, Mark ; Lamm, Donald ; Persad, Raj ; Buckley, Roger ; Böhle, Andreas ; Colombel, Marc ; Palou, Joan. / Defining and treating the spectrum of intermediate risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. In: Journal of Urology. 2014 ; Vol. 192, No. 2. pp. 305-315.
@article{94f4945c8eb840c388e1ab94b5bd9921,
title = "Defining and treating the spectrum of intermediate risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer",
abstract = "Purpose Low, intermediate and high risk categories have been defined to help guide the treatment of patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (Ta, T1, CIS). However, while low and high risk disease has been well classified, the intermediate risk category has traditionally comprised a heterogeneous group that does not fit into either of these categories. As a result, many urologists remain uncertain about the categorization of patients as intermediate risk as well as the selection of the most appropriate therapeutic option for this patient population. We review the current literature and clinical practice guidelines on intermediate risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer and, based on our findings, provide urologists with a better understanding of this heterogeneous risk group as well as practical recommendations for the treatment of intermediate risk patients. Materials and Methods The IBCG analyzed published clinical trials, meta-analyses and current clinical practice guidelines on intermediate risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer available as of September 2013. The definitions of intermediate risk, patient outcomes and guideline recommendations were considered, as were the limitations of the available literature and additional parameters that may be useful in guiding treatment decisions in intermediate risk patients. Results Current definitions and management recommendations for intermediate risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer vary. The most simple and practical definition is that proposed by the IBCG and the AUA of multiple and/or recurrent low grade Ta tumors. The IBCG suggests that several factors should be considered in clinical decisions in intermediate risk disease, including number (greater than 1) and size (greater than 3 cm) of tumors, timing (recurrence within 1 year) and frequency (more than 1 per year) of recurrence, and previous treatment. In patients without these risk factors a single, immediate instillation of chemotherapy is advised. In those with 1 to 2 risk factors adjuvant intravesical therapy (intravesical chemotherapy or maintenance bacillus Calmette-Gu{\'e}rin) is recommended, and previous intravesical therapy should be considered when choosing between these adjuvant therapies. For those patients with 3 to 4 risk factors, maintenance bacillus Calmette-Gu{\'e}rin is recommended. It is also important that all intermediate risk patients are accurately risk stratified at initial diagnosis and during subsequent followup. This requires appropriate transurethral resection of the bladder tumor, vigilance to rule out carcinoma in situ or other potential high risk tumors, and review of histological material directly with the pathologist. Conclusions Intermediate risk disease is a heterogeneous category, and there is a paucity of independent studies comparing therapies and outcomes in subgroups of intermediate risk patients. The IBCG has proposed a management algorithm that considers tumor characteristics, timing and frequency of recurrence, and previous treatment. Subgroup analyses of intermediate risk subjects in pivotal EORTC trials and meta-analyses will be important to validate the proposed algorithm and support clear evidence-based recommendations for subgroups of intermediate risk patients.",
keywords = "adjuvant, administration, chemotherapy, intravesical, mycobacterium bovis, risk, urinary bladder neoplasms",
author = "Kamat, {Ashish M.} and Witjes, {J. Alfred} and Maurizio Brausi and Mark Soloway and Donald Lamm and Raj Persad and Roger Buckley and Andreas B{\"o}hle and Marc Colombel and Joan Palou",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.2573",
language = "English",
volume = "192",
pages = "305--315",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defining and treating the spectrum of intermediate risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer

AU - Kamat, Ashish M.

AU - Witjes, J. Alfred

AU - Brausi, Maurizio

AU - Soloway, Mark

AU - Lamm, Donald

AU - Persad, Raj

AU - Buckley, Roger

AU - Böhle, Andreas

AU - Colombel, Marc

AU - Palou, Joan

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Purpose Low, intermediate and high risk categories have been defined to help guide the treatment of patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (Ta, T1, CIS). However, while low and high risk disease has been well classified, the intermediate risk category has traditionally comprised a heterogeneous group that does not fit into either of these categories. As a result, many urologists remain uncertain about the categorization of patients as intermediate risk as well as the selection of the most appropriate therapeutic option for this patient population. We review the current literature and clinical practice guidelines on intermediate risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer and, based on our findings, provide urologists with a better understanding of this heterogeneous risk group as well as practical recommendations for the treatment of intermediate risk patients. Materials and Methods The IBCG analyzed published clinical trials, meta-analyses and current clinical practice guidelines on intermediate risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer available as of September 2013. The definitions of intermediate risk, patient outcomes and guideline recommendations were considered, as were the limitations of the available literature and additional parameters that may be useful in guiding treatment decisions in intermediate risk patients. Results Current definitions and management recommendations for intermediate risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer vary. The most simple and practical definition is that proposed by the IBCG and the AUA of multiple and/or recurrent low grade Ta tumors. The IBCG suggests that several factors should be considered in clinical decisions in intermediate risk disease, including number (greater than 1) and size (greater than 3 cm) of tumors, timing (recurrence within 1 year) and frequency (more than 1 per year) of recurrence, and previous treatment. In patients without these risk factors a single, immediate instillation of chemotherapy is advised. In those with 1 to 2 risk factors adjuvant intravesical therapy (intravesical chemotherapy or maintenance bacillus Calmette-Guérin) is recommended, and previous intravesical therapy should be considered when choosing between these adjuvant therapies. For those patients with 3 to 4 risk factors, maintenance bacillus Calmette-Guérin is recommended. It is also important that all intermediate risk patients are accurately risk stratified at initial diagnosis and during subsequent followup. This requires appropriate transurethral resection of the bladder tumor, vigilance to rule out carcinoma in situ or other potential high risk tumors, and review of histological material directly with the pathologist. Conclusions Intermediate risk disease is a heterogeneous category, and there is a paucity of independent studies comparing therapies and outcomes in subgroups of intermediate risk patients. The IBCG has proposed a management algorithm that considers tumor characteristics, timing and frequency of recurrence, and previous treatment. Subgroup analyses of intermediate risk subjects in pivotal EORTC trials and meta-analyses will be important to validate the proposed algorithm and support clear evidence-based recommendations for subgroups of intermediate risk patients.

AB - Purpose Low, intermediate and high risk categories have been defined to help guide the treatment of patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (Ta, T1, CIS). However, while low and high risk disease has been well classified, the intermediate risk category has traditionally comprised a heterogeneous group that does not fit into either of these categories. As a result, many urologists remain uncertain about the categorization of patients as intermediate risk as well as the selection of the most appropriate therapeutic option for this patient population. We review the current literature and clinical practice guidelines on intermediate risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer and, based on our findings, provide urologists with a better understanding of this heterogeneous risk group as well as practical recommendations for the treatment of intermediate risk patients. Materials and Methods The IBCG analyzed published clinical trials, meta-analyses and current clinical practice guidelines on intermediate risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer available as of September 2013. The definitions of intermediate risk, patient outcomes and guideline recommendations were considered, as were the limitations of the available literature and additional parameters that may be useful in guiding treatment decisions in intermediate risk patients. Results Current definitions and management recommendations for intermediate risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer vary. The most simple and practical definition is that proposed by the IBCG and the AUA of multiple and/or recurrent low grade Ta tumors. The IBCG suggests that several factors should be considered in clinical decisions in intermediate risk disease, including number (greater than 1) and size (greater than 3 cm) of tumors, timing (recurrence within 1 year) and frequency (more than 1 per year) of recurrence, and previous treatment. In patients without these risk factors a single, immediate instillation of chemotherapy is advised. In those with 1 to 2 risk factors adjuvant intravesical therapy (intravesical chemotherapy or maintenance bacillus Calmette-Guérin) is recommended, and previous intravesical therapy should be considered when choosing between these adjuvant therapies. For those patients with 3 to 4 risk factors, maintenance bacillus Calmette-Guérin is recommended. It is also important that all intermediate risk patients are accurately risk stratified at initial diagnosis and during subsequent followup. This requires appropriate transurethral resection of the bladder tumor, vigilance to rule out carcinoma in situ or other potential high risk tumors, and review of histological material directly with the pathologist. Conclusions Intermediate risk disease is a heterogeneous category, and there is a paucity of independent studies comparing therapies and outcomes in subgroups of intermediate risk patients. The IBCG has proposed a management algorithm that considers tumor characteristics, timing and frequency of recurrence, and previous treatment. Subgroup analyses of intermediate risk subjects in pivotal EORTC trials and meta-analyses will be important to validate the proposed algorithm and support clear evidence-based recommendations for subgroups of intermediate risk patients.

KW - adjuvant

KW - administration

KW - chemotherapy

KW - intravesical

KW - mycobacterium bovis

KW - risk

KW - urinary bladder neoplasms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904247133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904247133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.2573

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.2573

M3 - Article

C2 - 24681333

AN - SCOPUS:84904247133

VL - 192

SP - 305

EP - 315

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 2

ER -