Decision theory analysis of the enteric morbidity and surgical staging in the treatment of advanced cervical cancer

L. B. Twiggs, R. A. Potish

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Decision theory analysis is a systematic approach to decision making under conditions of uncertainty. Using formal decision analysis, we analyzed the clinical course of 275 patients with advanced cervical cancer. As selection in the application of surgical staging made survival comparisons difficult, enteric morbidity was used as a valued outcome. While the probability of severe enteric morbidity in patients who undergo extended field radiotherapy and surgical staging is twice as high as that in those not receiving extended portals and undergoing surgical staging (0.095 versus 0.050), the increased precision of defining those patients in need of extended portals resulted in very little increased morbidity in the total group. The difference in probability of enteric morbidity in patients with surgical staging and those without was 0.065 versus 0.061. Efforts to increase the proportion of patients with metastatic disease in the surgical staging group by using as stratifying parameters undifferentiated histology or possibly, in premenopausal patients, progesterone receptor levels may allow for the best survival therapeutic ratio as the maximum survival benefit will be gained by a minimum of enteric morbidity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)134-140
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume148
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jan 1 1984

Fingerprint

Decision Theory
Decision Support Techniques
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Morbidity
Survival
Therapeutics
Progesterone Receptors
Uncertainty
Decision Making
Histology
Radiotherapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Decision theory analysis of the enteric morbidity and surgical staging in the treatment of advanced cervical cancer. / Twiggs, L. B.; Potish, R. A.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 148, No. 2, 01.01.1984, p. 134-140.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d2f044334d9f47e28465ca22fa484401,
title = "Decision theory analysis of the enteric morbidity and surgical staging in the treatment of advanced cervical cancer",
abstract = "Decision theory analysis is a systematic approach to decision making under conditions of uncertainty. Using formal decision analysis, we analyzed the clinical course of 275 patients with advanced cervical cancer. As selection in the application of surgical staging made survival comparisons difficult, enteric morbidity was used as a valued outcome. While the probability of severe enteric morbidity in patients who undergo extended field radiotherapy and surgical staging is twice as high as that in those not receiving extended portals and undergoing surgical staging (0.095 versus 0.050), the increased precision of defining those patients in need of extended portals resulted in very little increased morbidity in the total group. The difference in probability of enteric morbidity in patients with surgical staging and those without was 0.065 versus 0.061. Efforts to increase the proportion of patients with metastatic disease in the surgical staging group by using as stratifying parameters undifferentiated histology or possibly, in premenopausal patients, progesterone receptor levels may allow for the best survival therapeutic ratio as the maximum survival benefit will be gained by a minimum of enteric morbidity.",
author = "Twiggs, {L. B.} and Potish, {R. A.}",
year = "1984",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "148",
pages = "134--140",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Decision theory analysis of the enteric morbidity and surgical staging in the treatment of advanced cervical cancer

AU - Twiggs, L. B.

AU - Potish, R. A.

PY - 1984/1/1

Y1 - 1984/1/1

N2 - Decision theory analysis is a systematic approach to decision making under conditions of uncertainty. Using formal decision analysis, we analyzed the clinical course of 275 patients with advanced cervical cancer. As selection in the application of surgical staging made survival comparisons difficult, enteric morbidity was used as a valued outcome. While the probability of severe enteric morbidity in patients who undergo extended field radiotherapy and surgical staging is twice as high as that in those not receiving extended portals and undergoing surgical staging (0.095 versus 0.050), the increased precision of defining those patients in need of extended portals resulted in very little increased morbidity in the total group. The difference in probability of enteric morbidity in patients with surgical staging and those without was 0.065 versus 0.061. Efforts to increase the proportion of patients with metastatic disease in the surgical staging group by using as stratifying parameters undifferentiated histology or possibly, in premenopausal patients, progesterone receptor levels may allow for the best survival therapeutic ratio as the maximum survival benefit will be gained by a minimum of enteric morbidity.

AB - Decision theory analysis is a systematic approach to decision making under conditions of uncertainty. Using formal decision analysis, we analyzed the clinical course of 275 patients with advanced cervical cancer. As selection in the application of surgical staging made survival comparisons difficult, enteric morbidity was used as a valued outcome. While the probability of severe enteric morbidity in patients who undergo extended field radiotherapy and surgical staging is twice as high as that in those not receiving extended portals and undergoing surgical staging (0.095 versus 0.050), the increased precision of defining those patients in need of extended portals resulted in very little increased morbidity in the total group. The difference in probability of enteric morbidity in patients with surgical staging and those without was 0.065 versus 0.061. Efforts to increase the proportion of patients with metastatic disease in the surgical staging group by using as stratifying parameters undifferentiated histology or possibly, in premenopausal patients, progesterone receptor levels may allow for the best survival therapeutic ratio as the maximum survival benefit will be gained by a minimum of enteric morbidity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021366478&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021366478&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 6691388

AN - SCOPUS:0021366478

VL - 148

SP - 134

EP - 140

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 2

ER -