Dangerous dualisms or Murky monism? A reply to Jim Garrison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Jim Garrison's recent criticisms of what he refers to as 'dangerous dualisms' in my theory of critical thinking are unsuccessful. They fail, in large part, because of misinterpretations of my view, but also because of Garrison's systematic reliance on problematic aspects of Dewey's terminology and philosophy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)577-595
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Philosophy of Education
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2001

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • History
  • Philosophy

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Dangerous dualisms or Murky monism? A reply to Jim Garrison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this