Dangerous dualisms or Murky monism? A reply to Jim Garrison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Jim Garrison's recent criticisms of what he refers to as 'dangerous dualisms' in my theory of critical thinking are unsuccessful. They fail, in large part, because of misinterpretations of my view, but also because of Garrison's systematic reliance on problematic aspects of Dewey's terminology and philosophy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)577-595
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Philosophy of Education
Volume35
Issue number4
StatePublished - Nov 2001

Fingerprint

technical language
criticism
philosophy
Monism
Criticism
Reliance
Misinterpretation
Dualism
Critical Thinking
Philosophy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Philosophy
  • Education

Cite this

Dangerous dualisms or Murky monism? A reply to Jim Garrison. / Siegel, Harvey.

In: Journal of Philosophy of Education, Vol. 35, No. 4, 11.2001, p. 577-595.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6484ad6009fb4944ac9d829c8b073e00,
title = "Dangerous dualisms or Murky monism? A reply to Jim Garrison",
abstract = "Jim Garrison's recent criticisms of what he refers to as 'dangerous dualisms' in my theory of critical thinking are unsuccessful. They fail, in large part, because of misinterpretations of my view, but also because of Garrison's systematic reliance on problematic aspects of Dewey's terminology and philosophy.",
author = "Harvey Siegel",
year = "2001",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "577--595",
journal = "Journal of Philosophy of Education",
issn = "0309-8249",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dangerous dualisms or Murky monism? A reply to Jim Garrison

AU - Siegel, Harvey

PY - 2001/11

Y1 - 2001/11

N2 - Jim Garrison's recent criticisms of what he refers to as 'dangerous dualisms' in my theory of critical thinking are unsuccessful. They fail, in large part, because of misinterpretations of my view, but also because of Garrison's systematic reliance on problematic aspects of Dewey's terminology and philosophy.

AB - Jim Garrison's recent criticisms of what he refers to as 'dangerous dualisms' in my theory of critical thinking are unsuccessful. They fail, in large part, because of misinterpretations of my view, but also because of Garrison's systematic reliance on problematic aspects of Dewey's terminology and philosophy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0040479661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0040479661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0040479661

VL - 35

SP - 577

EP - 595

JO - Journal of Philosophy of Education

JF - Journal of Philosophy of Education

SN - 0309-8249

IS - 4

ER -