Current trends in the treatment of infertility in men with spinal cord injury

Apostolos Kafetsoulis, Nancy Brackett, Emad Ibrahim, George Attia, Charles M Lynne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

76 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine current use of penile vibratory stimulation (PVS), electroejaculation (EEJ), and intrauterine insemination (IUI) in treatment of infertility in men with spinal cord injury (SCI). Design: Prospective survey, retrospective chart review, and literature review. Setting: Major university medical center. Patient(s): Male SCI patients and female partners. Intervention(s): A survey administered to professionals determined current treatment methods for infertility in couples with SCI male partners. Main Outcome Measure(s): Sperm retrieval methods, ejaculation success rates, total motile sperm (TMS), IUI application, and IUI outcomes. Result(s): Twenty-eight percent of surveyed professionals do not retrieve sperm from ejaculates of SCI patients, relying instead on retrieval from reproductive tissues. Reasons for not offering PVS or EEJ were lack of familiarity, training, or equipment. Thirty-four percent do not offer IUI to these couples. Chart review showed that semen could be retrieved by PVS or EEJ in 95% of patients. Fifty-three percent and 43% of trials had TMS >5 and >10 × 106, respectively. Of survey respondents performing IUI, 42% lacked enough data to estimate pregnancy rates (PRs) in these couples. Literature review showed IUI PRs between 9% and 18% per cycle and 30% and 60% per couple. Conclusion(s): Based on ejaculation success rates, TMS yields, and IUI outcomes, the methods of PVS, EEJ, and IUI warrant consideration in centers not currently offering these options for couples with SCI male partners.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)781-789
Number of pages9
JournalFertility and Sterility
Volume86
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2006

Fingerprint

Insemination
Spinal Cord Injuries
Infertility
Spermatozoa
Ejaculation
Pregnancy Rate
Therapeutics
Sperm Retrieval
Semen
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Equipment and Supplies
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • ejaculation
  • electroejaculation
  • infertility
  • IUI
  • IVF
  • pregnancy
  • PVS
  • semen
  • sperm
  • Spinal cord injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Current trends in the treatment of infertility in men with spinal cord injury. / Kafetsoulis, Apostolos; Brackett, Nancy; Ibrahim, Emad; Attia, George; Lynne, Charles M.

In: Fertility and Sterility, Vol. 86, No. 4, 01.10.2006, p. 781-789.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kafetsoulis, Apostolos ; Brackett, Nancy ; Ibrahim, Emad ; Attia, George ; Lynne, Charles M. / Current trends in the treatment of infertility in men with spinal cord injury. In: Fertility and Sterility. 2006 ; Vol. 86, No. 4. pp. 781-789.
@article{9dd82139e3184aa8bf904ec520ab4a62,
title = "Current trends in the treatment of infertility in men with spinal cord injury",
abstract = "Objective: To determine current use of penile vibratory stimulation (PVS), electroejaculation (EEJ), and intrauterine insemination (IUI) in treatment of infertility in men with spinal cord injury (SCI). Design: Prospective survey, retrospective chart review, and literature review. Setting: Major university medical center. Patient(s): Male SCI patients and female partners. Intervention(s): A survey administered to professionals determined current treatment methods for infertility in couples with SCI male partners. Main Outcome Measure(s): Sperm retrieval methods, ejaculation success rates, total motile sperm (TMS), IUI application, and IUI outcomes. Result(s): Twenty-eight percent of surveyed professionals do not retrieve sperm from ejaculates of SCI patients, relying instead on retrieval from reproductive tissues. Reasons for not offering PVS or EEJ were lack of familiarity, training, or equipment. Thirty-four percent do not offer IUI to these couples. Chart review showed that semen could be retrieved by PVS or EEJ in 95{\%} of patients. Fifty-three percent and 43{\%} of trials had TMS >5 and >10 × 106, respectively. Of survey respondents performing IUI, 42{\%} lacked enough data to estimate pregnancy rates (PRs) in these couples. Literature review showed IUI PRs between 9{\%} and 18{\%} per cycle and 30{\%} and 60{\%} per couple. Conclusion(s): Based on ejaculation success rates, TMS yields, and IUI outcomes, the methods of PVS, EEJ, and IUI warrant consideration in centers not currently offering these options for couples with SCI male partners.",
keywords = "ejaculation, electroejaculation, infertility, IUI, IVF, pregnancy, PVS, semen, sperm, Spinal cord injuries",
author = "Apostolos Kafetsoulis and Nancy Brackett and Emad Ibrahim and George Attia and Lynne, {Charles M}",
year = "2006",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.01.060",
language = "English",
volume = "86",
pages = "781--789",
journal = "Fertility and Sterility",
issn = "0015-0282",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current trends in the treatment of infertility in men with spinal cord injury

AU - Kafetsoulis, Apostolos

AU - Brackett, Nancy

AU - Ibrahim, Emad

AU - Attia, George

AU - Lynne, Charles M

PY - 2006/10/1

Y1 - 2006/10/1

N2 - Objective: To determine current use of penile vibratory stimulation (PVS), electroejaculation (EEJ), and intrauterine insemination (IUI) in treatment of infertility in men with spinal cord injury (SCI). Design: Prospective survey, retrospective chart review, and literature review. Setting: Major university medical center. Patient(s): Male SCI patients and female partners. Intervention(s): A survey administered to professionals determined current treatment methods for infertility in couples with SCI male partners. Main Outcome Measure(s): Sperm retrieval methods, ejaculation success rates, total motile sperm (TMS), IUI application, and IUI outcomes. Result(s): Twenty-eight percent of surveyed professionals do not retrieve sperm from ejaculates of SCI patients, relying instead on retrieval from reproductive tissues. Reasons for not offering PVS or EEJ were lack of familiarity, training, or equipment. Thirty-four percent do not offer IUI to these couples. Chart review showed that semen could be retrieved by PVS or EEJ in 95% of patients. Fifty-three percent and 43% of trials had TMS >5 and >10 × 106, respectively. Of survey respondents performing IUI, 42% lacked enough data to estimate pregnancy rates (PRs) in these couples. Literature review showed IUI PRs between 9% and 18% per cycle and 30% and 60% per couple. Conclusion(s): Based on ejaculation success rates, TMS yields, and IUI outcomes, the methods of PVS, EEJ, and IUI warrant consideration in centers not currently offering these options for couples with SCI male partners.

AB - Objective: To determine current use of penile vibratory stimulation (PVS), electroejaculation (EEJ), and intrauterine insemination (IUI) in treatment of infertility in men with spinal cord injury (SCI). Design: Prospective survey, retrospective chart review, and literature review. Setting: Major university medical center. Patient(s): Male SCI patients and female partners. Intervention(s): A survey administered to professionals determined current treatment methods for infertility in couples with SCI male partners. Main Outcome Measure(s): Sperm retrieval methods, ejaculation success rates, total motile sperm (TMS), IUI application, and IUI outcomes. Result(s): Twenty-eight percent of surveyed professionals do not retrieve sperm from ejaculates of SCI patients, relying instead on retrieval from reproductive tissues. Reasons for not offering PVS or EEJ were lack of familiarity, training, or equipment. Thirty-four percent do not offer IUI to these couples. Chart review showed that semen could be retrieved by PVS or EEJ in 95% of patients. Fifty-three percent and 43% of trials had TMS >5 and >10 × 106, respectively. Of survey respondents performing IUI, 42% lacked enough data to estimate pregnancy rates (PRs) in these couples. Literature review showed IUI PRs between 9% and 18% per cycle and 30% and 60% per couple. Conclusion(s): Based on ejaculation success rates, TMS yields, and IUI outcomes, the methods of PVS, EEJ, and IUI warrant consideration in centers not currently offering these options for couples with SCI male partners.

KW - ejaculation

KW - electroejaculation

KW - infertility

KW - IUI

KW - IVF

KW - pregnancy

KW - PVS

KW - semen

KW - sperm

KW - Spinal cord injuries

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749249551&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749249551&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.01.060

DO - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.01.060

M3 - Article

VL - 86

SP - 781

EP - 789

JO - Fertility and Sterility

JF - Fertility and Sterility

SN - 0015-0282

IS - 4

ER -