Crystalloid flush with backward unclamping may decrease post-reperfusion cardiac arrest and improve short-term graft function when compared to portal blood flush with forward unclamping during liver transplantation

Kyota Fukazawa, Seigo Nishida, Taizo Hibi, Ernesto Pretto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

During liver transplant (LT), the release of vasoactive substances into the systemic circulation is associated with severe hemodynamic instability that is injurious to the recipient and/or the post-ischemic graft. Crystalloid flush with backward unclamping (CB) and portal blood flush with forward unclamping (PF) are two reperfusion methods to reduce reperfusion-related cardiovascular perturbations in our center. The primary aim of this study was to compare these two methods. After institutional review board (IRB) approval, cadaveric whole LT cases performed between 2003 and 2008 were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups based on reperfusion methods: CB or PF. After background matching with propensity score, the effect of each method on post-operative graft function was assessed in detail. In our cohort of 478 patients, CB was used in 313 grafts and PF in 165. Thirty-day graft survival was lower, and risk of retransplantation was higher in PF. Multivariable model showed that CB is an independent factor to reduce primary non-function, cardiac arrest and improve 30-d graft survival. Also, the incidence of ischemic-type biliary lesions was significantly higher in the PF group. Reperfusion methods affect intraoperative hemodynamics and post-transplant outcome. CB allows for control over temperature and composition of the perfusate, perfusion pressure, and the rate of infusion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)492-502
Number of pages11
JournalClinical Transplantation
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2013

Fingerprint

Heart Arrest
Liver Transplantation
Reperfusion
Transplants
Graft Survival
Hemodynamics
Propensity Score
Research Ethics Committees
Liver
crystalloid solutions
Perfusion
Pressure
Temperature
Incidence

Keywords

  • Cardiac arrest
  • Flush
  • Graft function
  • Liver transplant
  • Portal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation

Cite this

Crystalloid flush with backward unclamping may decrease post-reperfusion cardiac arrest and improve short-term graft function when compared to portal blood flush with forward unclamping during liver transplantation. / Fukazawa, Kyota; Nishida, Seigo; Hibi, Taizo; Pretto, Ernesto.

In: Clinical Transplantation, Vol. 27, No. 4, 01.07.2013, p. 492-502.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5cb6f0319d214d7ea00d0da6dbb841ce,
title = "Crystalloid flush with backward unclamping may decrease post-reperfusion cardiac arrest and improve short-term graft function when compared to portal blood flush with forward unclamping during liver transplantation",
abstract = "During liver transplant (LT), the release of vasoactive substances into the systemic circulation is associated with severe hemodynamic instability that is injurious to the recipient and/or the post-ischemic graft. Crystalloid flush with backward unclamping (CB) and portal blood flush with forward unclamping (PF) are two reperfusion methods to reduce reperfusion-related cardiovascular perturbations in our center. The primary aim of this study was to compare these two methods. After institutional review board (IRB) approval, cadaveric whole LT cases performed between 2003 and 2008 were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups based on reperfusion methods: CB or PF. After background matching with propensity score, the effect of each method on post-operative graft function was assessed in detail. In our cohort of 478 patients, CB was used in 313 grafts and PF in 165. Thirty-day graft survival was lower, and risk of retransplantation was higher in PF. Multivariable model showed that CB is an independent factor to reduce primary non-function, cardiac arrest and improve 30-d graft survival. Also, the incidence of ischemic-type biliary lesions was significantly higher in the PF group. Reperfusion methods affect intraoperative hemodynamics and post-transplant outcome. CB allows for control over temperature and composition of the perfusate, perfusion pressure, and the rate of infusion.",
keywords = "Cardiac arrest, Flush, Graft function, Liver transplant, Portal",
author = "Kyota Fukazawa and Seigo Nishida and Taizo Hibi and Ernesto Pretto",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ctr.12130",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "492--502",
journal = "Clinical Transplantation",
issn = "0902-0063",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Crystalloid flush with backward unclamping may decrease post-reperfusion cardiac arrest and improve short-term graft function when compared to portal blood flush with forward unclamping during liver transplantation

AU - Fukazawa, Kyota

AU - Nishida, Seigo

AU - Hibi, Taizo

AU - Pretto, Ernesto

PY - 2013/7/1

Y1 - 2013/7/1

N2 - During liver transplant (LT), the release of vasoactive substances into the systemic circulation is associated with severe hemodynamic instability that is injurious to the recipient and/or the post-ischemic graft. Crystalloid flush with backward unclamping (CB) and portal blood flush with forward unclamping (PF) are two reperfusion methods to reduce reperfusion-related cardiovascular perturbations in our center. The primary aim of this study was to compare these two methods. After institutional review board (IRB) approval, cadaveric whole LT cases performed between 2003 and 2008 were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups based on reperfusion methods: CB or PF. After background matching with propensity score, the effect of each method on post-operative graft function was assessed in detail. In our cohort of 478 patients, CB was used in 313 grafts and PF in 165. Thirty-day graft survival was lower, and risk of retransplantation was higher in PF. Multivariable model showed that CB is an independent factor to reduce primary non-function, cardiac arrest and improve 30-d graft survival. Also, the incidence of ischemic-type biliary lesions was significantly higher in the PF group. Reperfusion methods affect intraoperative hemodynamics and post-transplant outcome. CB allows for control over temperature and composition of the perfusate, perfusion pressure, and the rate of infusion.

AB - During liver transplant (LT), the release of vasoactive substances into the systemic circulation is associated with severe hemodynamic instability that is injurious to the recipient and/or the post-ischemic graft. Crystalloid flush with backward unclamping (CB) and portal blood flush with forward unclamping (PF) are two reperfusion methods to reduce reperfusion-related cardiovascular perturbations in our center. The primary aim of this study was to compare these two methods. After institutional review board (IRB) approval, cadaveric whole LT cases performed between 2003 and 2008 were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups based on reperfusion methods: CB or PF. After background matching with propensity score, the effect of each method on post-operative graft function was assessed in detail. In our cohort of 478 patients, CB was used in 313 grafts and PF in 165. Thirty-day graft survival was lower, and risk of retransplantation was higher in PF. Multivariable model showed that CB is an independent factor to reduce primary non-function, cardiac arrest and improve 30-d graft survival. Also, the incidence of ischemic-type biliary lesions was significantly higher in the PF group. Reperfusion methods affect intraoperative hemodynamics and post-transplant outcome. CB allows for control over temperature and composition of the perfusate, perfusion pressure, and the rate of infusion.

KW - Cardiac arrest

KW - Flush

KW - Graft function

KW - Liver transplant

KW - Portal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881546661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881546661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ctr.12130

DO - 10.1111/ctr.12130

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 492

EP - 502

JO - Clinical Transplantation

JF - Clinical Transplantation

SN - 0902-0063

IS - 4

ER -