Critical appraisal of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy

Ricardo Brandina, Andre Berger, Kazumi Kamoi, Inderbir S. Gill

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations


PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To perform a contemporary critical appraisal of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RaRP) through a review of the recent literature. RECENT FINDINGS: Most studies of RaRP are observational and report perioperative, functional and short-term oncological outcomes. RaRP is associated with less blood loss and blood transfusion than open radical prostatectomy (ORP), has a positive margin rate of 9.4-20.9%, potency rate of 79.2-80.4% at 1 year and a continence rate of 90.2-97% at 1 year. Costs of the da Vinci system remain a limitation of this technique. SUMMARY: RaRP has shown rapid dissemination over the past few years in the US urological community. However, prospective randomized clinical trials with long-term follow-up of RaRP, ORP and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy are still necessary.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)290-296
Number of pages7
JournalCurrent opinion in urology
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 2009
Externally publishedYes


  • Laparoscopy
  • Prostate cancer
  • Prostatectomy
  • Robotics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology


Dive into the research topics of 'Critical appraisal of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this