Criteria for the Electrocardiographic Diagnosis of Atrial Flutter Improve Diagnostic Accuracy

Kenneth M. Weinberg, Pablo Denes, Alan H. Kadish, Jeffrey Goldberger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We previously developed and validated diagnostic criteria for the differentiation of atrial flutter from atrial fibrillation. In this study we examine if the criteria (F waves in the frontal plane and a partially or completely regular ventricular response) can improve the diagnostic accuracy of internists. Methods: Two groups of 10 internists (1 group given the criteria and 1 not) read a set of electrocardiograms (ECGs) selected from the hospital database with cardiologist-confirmed diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or "atrial fibrillation-flutter" (100 each). The final diagnoses of all ECGs were provided by a consensus of electrophysiologists. The criteria also were used to establish the criteria-based diagnoses. Results: Of the 298 ECGs analyzed, the electrophysiologist diagnosis was atrial fibrillation in 71% and atrial flutter in 29%. The concordance of the internists' diagnoses with the electrophysiologist consensus diagnoses was 66 ± 12% for those not given the criteria and 81 ± 4% (P <.01) for those given the criteria. The concordance of the internists' diagnoses with the criteria based diagnoses was 66 ± 12% for those not given the criteria and 83 ± 4% (P <.01) for those given the criteria. Conclusions: The simple criteria of F waves in the frontal plane and a partially or completely regular ventricular response can be used to improve the differentiation of atrial flutter from atrial fibrillation based on the ECG.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)814-818
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Medicine
Volume120
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Atrial Flutter
Atrial Fibrillation
Electrocardiography
Databases

Keywords

  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Atrial flutter
  • Electrocardiogram

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Criteria for the Electrocardiographic Diagnosis of Atrial Flutter Improve Diagnostic Accuracy. / Weinberg, Kenneth M.; Denes, Pablo; Kadish, Alan H.; Goldberger, Jeffrey.

In: American Journal of Medicine, Vol. 120, No. 9, 01.09.2007, p. 814-818.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Weinberg, Kenneth M. ; Denes, Pablo ; Kadish, Alan H. ; Goldberger, Jeffrey. / Criteria for the Electrocardiographic Diagnosis of Atrial Flutter Improve Diagnostic Accuracy. In: American Journal of Medicine. 2007 ; Vol. 120, No. 9. pp. 814-818.
@article{3301928c31bb4bf0ab542c8132b54fcd,
title = "Criteria for the Electrocardiographic Diagnosis of Atrial Flutter Improve Diagnostic Accuracy",
abstract = "Purpose: We previously developed and validated diagnostic criteria for the differentiation of atrial flutter from atrial fibrillation. In this study we examine if the criteria (F waves in the frontal plane and a partially or completely regular ventricular response) can improve the diagnostic accuracy of internists. Methods: Two groups of 10 internists (1 group given the criteria and 1 not) read a set of electrocardiograms (ECGs) selected from the hospital database with cardiologist-confirmed diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or {"}atrial fibrillation-flutter{"} (100 each). The final diagnoses of all ECGs were provided by a consensus of electrophysiologists. The criteria also were used to establish the criteria-based diagnoses. Results: Of the 298 ECGs analyzed, the electrophysiologist diagnosis was atrial fibrillation in 71{\%} and atrial flutter in 29{\%}. The concordance of the internists' diagnoses with the electrophysiologist consensus diagnoses was 66 ± 12{\%} for those not given the criteria and 81 ± 4{\%} (P <.01) for those given the criteria. The concordance of the internists' diagnoses with the criteria based diagnoses was 66 ± 12{\%} for those not given the criteria and 83 ± 4{\%} (P <.01) for those given the criteria. Conclusions: The simple criteria of F waves in the frontal plane and a partially or completely regular ventricular response can be used to improve the differentiation of atrial flutter from atrial fibrillation based on the ECG.",
keywords = "Atrial fibrillation, Atrial flutter, Electrocardiogram",
author = "Weinberg, {Kenneth M.} and Pablo Denes and Kadish, {Alan H.} and Jeffrey Goldberger",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.06.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "120",
pages = "814--818",
journal = "American Journal of Medicine",
issn = "0002-9343",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Criteria for the Electrocardiographic Diagnosis of Atrial Flutter Improve Diagnostic Accuracy

AU - Weinberg, Kenneth M.

AU - Denes, Pablo

AU - Kadish, Alan H.

AU - Goldberger, Jeffrey

PY - 2007/9/1

Y1 - 2007/9/1

N2 - Purpose: We previously developed and validated diagnostic criteria for the differentiation of atrial flutter from atrial fibrillation. In this study we examine if the criteria (F waves in the frontal plane and a partially or completely regular ventricular response) can improve the diagnostic accuracy of internists. Methods: Two groups of 10 internists (1 group given the criteria and 1 not) read a set of electrocardiograms (ECGs) selected from the hospital database with cardiologist-confirmed diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or "atrial fibrillation-flutter" (100 each). The final diagnoses of all ECGs were provided by a consensus of electrophysiologists. The criteria also were used to establish the criteria-based diagnoses. Results: Of the 298 ECGs analyzed, the electrophysiologist diagnosis was atrial fibrillation in 71% and atrial flutter in 29%. The concordance of the internists' diagnoses with the electrophysiologist consensus diagnoses was 66 ± 12% for those not given the criteria and 81 ± 4% (P <.01) for those given the criteria. The concordance of the internists' diagnoses with the criteria based diagnoses was 66 ± 12% for those not given the criteria and 83 ± 4% (P <.01) for those given the criteria. Conclusions: The simple criteria of F waves in the frontal plane and a partially or completely regular ventricular response can be used to improve the differentiation of atrial flutter from atrial fibrillation based on the ECG.

AB - Purpose: We previously developed and validated diagnostic criteria for the differentiation of atrial flutter from atrial fibrillation. In this study we examine if the criteria (F waves in the frontal plane and a partially or completely regular ventricular response) can improve the diagnostic accuracy of internists. Methods: Two groups of 10 internists (1 group given the criteria and 1 not) read a set of electrocardiograms (ECGs) selected from the hospital database with cardiologist-confirmed diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or "atrial fibrillation-flutter" (100 each). The final diagnoses of all ECGs were provided by a consensus of electrophysiologists. The criteria also were used to establish the criteria-based diagnoses. Results: Of the 298 ECGs analyzed, the electrophysiologist diagnosis was atrial fibrillation in 71% and atrial flutter in 29%. The concordance of the internists' diagnoses with the electrophysiologist consensus diagnoses was 66 ± 12% for those not given the criteria and 81 ± 4% (P <.01) for those given the criteria. The concordance of the internists' diagnoses with the criteria based diagnoses was 66 ± 12% for those not given the criteria and 83 ± 4% (P <.01) for those given the criteria. Conclusions: The simple criteria of F waves in the frontal plane and a partially or completely regular ventricular response can be used to improve the differentiation of atrial flutter from atrial fibrillation based on the ECG.

KW - Atrial fibrillation

KW - Atrial flutter

KW - Electrocardiogram

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548146731&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548146731&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.06.013

DO - 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.06.013

M3 - Article

VL - 120

SP - 814

EP - 818

JO - American Journal of Medicine

JF - American Journal of Medicine

SN - 0002-9343

IS - 9

ER -