Crack as Proxy: Aggressive Federal Drug Prosecutions and the Production of Black–White Racial Inequality

Mona Lynch, Marisa Omori

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, we empirically examine jurisdictional variations in federal crack prosecutions to measure whether aggressive crack prosecutorial practices are associated with racial inequality in federal caseload characteristics and outcomes. Building on theories that address the production of inequality in institutional settings, we hypothesize that U.S. Attorneys’ offices that are more proactive in charging defendants with crack, relative to other kinds of drugs, and relative to case strength and seriousness, will demonstrate higher rates of black–white racial inequality in case outcomes across the entire criminal caseload. Consistent with theories of institutional racism, our findings demonstrate that aggressive crack prosecutions at the district level are a strong predictor of black–white inequality in conviction rates across the entire criminal caseload, and a much more modest predictor of inequality in final sentence outcomes. We conclude by discussing the importance of organizational-level empirical analyses for more effectively uncovering the conditions under which inequality can and does flourish in legal settings, and suggest possible future lines of inquiry along these lines.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)773-809
Number of pages37
JournalLaw and Society Review
Volume52
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

prosecution
drug
racism
district

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Cite this

Crack as Proxy : Aggressive Federal Drug Prosecutions and the Production of Black–White Racial Inequality. / Lynch, Mona; Omori, Marisa.

In: Law and Society Review, Vol. 52, No. 3, 01.09.2018, p. 773-809.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{12e9aed180904dd8a26e3fb0f0077362,
title = "Crack as Proxy: Aggressive Federal Drug Prosecutions and the Production of Black–White Racial Inequality",
abstract = "In this article, we empirically examine jurisdictional variations in federal crack prosecutions to measure whether aggressive crack prosecutorial practices are associated with racial inequality in federal caseload characteristics and outcomes. Building on theories that address the production of inequality in institutional settings, we hypothesize that U.S. Attorneys’ offices that are more proactive in charging defendants with crack, relative to other kinds of drugs, and relative to case strength and seriousness, will demonstrate higher rates of black–white racial inequality in case outcomes across the entire criminal caseload. Consistent with theories of institutional racism, our findings demonstrate that aggressive crack prosecutions at the district level are a strong predictor of black–white inequality in conviction rates across the entire criminal caseload, and a much more modest predictor of inequality in final sentence outcomes. We conclude by discussing the importance of organizational-level empirical analyses for more effectively uncovering the conditions under which inequality can and does flourish in legal settings, and suggest possible future lines of inquiry along these lines.",
author = "Mona Lynch and Marisa Omori",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/lasr.12348",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "773--809",
journal = "Law and Society Review",
issn = "0023-9216",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Crack as Proxy

T2 - Aggressive Federal Drug Prosecutions and the Production of Black–White Racial Inequality

AU - Lynch, Mona

AU - Omori, Marisa

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - In this article, we empirically examine jurisdictional variations in federal crack prosecutions to measure whether aggressive crack prosecutorial practices are associated with racial inequality in federal caseload characteristics and outcomes. Building on theories that address the production of inequality in institutional settings, we hypothesize that U.S. Attorneys’ offices that are more proactive in charging defendants with crack, relative to other kinds of drugs, and relative to case strength and seriousness, will demonstrate higher rates of black–white racial inequality in case outcomes across the entire criminal caseload. Consistent with theories of institutional racism, our findings demonstrate that aggressive crack prosecutions at the district level are a strong predictor of black–white inequality in conviction rates across the entire criminal caseload, and a much more modest predictor of inequality in final sentence outcomes. We conclude by discussing the importance of organizational-level empirical analyses for more effectively uncovering the conditions under which inequality can and does flourish in legal settings, and suggest possible future lines of inquiry along these lines.

AB - In this article, we empirically examine jurisdictional variations in federal crack prosecutions to measure whether aggressive crack prosecutorial practices are associated with racial inequality in federal caseload characteristics and outcomes. Building on theories that address the production of inequality in institutional settings, we hypothesize that U.S. Attorneys’ offices that are more proactive in charging defendants with crack, relative to other kinds of drugs, and relative to case strength and seriousness, will demonstrate higher rates of black–white racial inequality in case outcomes across the entire criminal caseload. Consistent with theories of institutional racism, our findings demonstrate that aggressive crack prosecutions at the district level are a strong predictor of black–white inequality in conviction rates across the entire criminal caseload, and a much more modest predictor of inequality in final sentence outcomes. We conclude by discussing the importance of organizational-level empirical analyses for more effectively uncovering the conditions under which inequality can and does flourish in legal settings, and suggest possible future lines of inquiry along these lines.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055443168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055443168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/lasr.12348

DO - 10.1111/lasr.12348

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85055443168

VL - 52

SP - 773

EP - 809

JO - Law and Society Review

JF - Law and Society Review

SN - 0023-9216

IS - 3

ER -