Corticosteroids for Septic Shock

Herbert S. Heineman, Bruce M. Smith, David L. Oshin, John N. Sheagren, Lerner B. Hinshaw, Charles L. Sprung, Panagiota V. Caralis, Eileen H. Marcial, Mark A. Gelbard, Robert C. Duncan, Edward H. Kass

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

To the Editor: Publication of the latest study on corticosteroids in septic shock, by Sprung al. (Nov. 1 issue),1 expands the body of knowledge on this difficult topic, but it is hard to say in which direction. Depending on whether one is for or against steroids, one may conclude either that the ultimate mortality is the same but shock is reversed, or that shock is reversed but the ultimate mortality is the same. (The accompanying editorial by Kass2 seems to lean in the latter direction.) Additional information might help us to understand the real contribution of steroids in these cases:.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)509-512
Number of pages4
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume312
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 21 1985

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Heineman, H. S., Smith, B. M., Oshin, D. L., Sheagren, J. N., Hinshaw, L. B., Sprung, C. L., Caralis, P. V., Marcial, E. H., Gelbard, M. A., Duncan, R. C., & Kass, E. H. (1985). Corticosteroids for Septic Shock. New England Journal of Medicine, 312(8), 509-512. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198502213120810