The authors regret to inform that there are few errors in Table 5. The correct table is given below. In addition, the fourth sentence of the third paragraph of the Conclusions and recommendations section: “The energy for such peroxone mineralization represents a cost of only $0.25/m3 ($0.96/1000 gal) [assuming 2.11 kWh/m3 for mineralization of COD in secondary effluent (Wu and Englehardt, 2015) and US average $0.12/kWh electricity (US Energy Information Administration, 2013)].” should be appended as follows: “…, and total capital and operating costs for a 1 MGD peroxone plant for organics mineralization are projected at $1.14/m3 ($4.33/1000 gal) [Guo et al. 2014].” The 17th reference should be corrected and appended as follows Guo, T., Englehardt, J., Fallon, H., 2016. Modeling the economic feasibility of large-scale net-zero water management: a case study. Water Environ. Res. 88, 811-823. Reference Guo, T., Englehardt, J., and Wu, T., 2014. Review of cost versus scale: water and wastewater treatment and reuse processes. Water Sci. Technol. 69, 223-234.>. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Ecological Modeling
- Water Science and Technology
- Waste Management and Disposal