Corrigendum to “Mineralizing urban net-zero water treatment: Field experience for energy-positive water management” [Water Res. 106 (2016) 352–363] (S0043135416307576)(10.1016/j.watres.2016.10.015)

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

The authors regret to inform that there are few errors in Table 5. The correct table is given below. In addition, the fourth sentence of the third paragraph of the Conclusions and recommendations section: “The energy for such peroxone mineralization represents a cost of only $0.25/m3 ($0.96/1000 gal) [assuming 2.11 kWh/m3 for mineralization of COD in secondary effluent (Wu and Englehardt, 2015) and US average $0.12/kWh electricity (US Energy Information Administration, 2013)].” should be appended as follows: “…, and total capital and operating costs for a 1 MGD peroxone plant for organics mineralization are projected at $1.14/m3 ($4.33/1000 gal) [Guo et al. 2014].” The 17th reference should be corrected and appended as follows Guo, T., Englehardt, J., Fallon, H., 2016. Modeling the economic feasibility of large-scale net-zero water management: a case study. Water Environ. Res. 88, 811-823. Reference Guo, T., Englehardt, J., and Wu, T., 2014. Review of cost versus scale: water and wastewater treatment and reuse processes. Water Sci. Technol. 69, 223-234.>. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)399-400
Number of pages2
JournalWater Research
Volume110
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

Water management
Water treatment
water management
water treatment
mineralization
Operating costs
cost
Wastewater treatment
energy
Costs
Water
Effluents
Electricity
water
Economics
electricity
effluent
economics
modeling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecological Modeling
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Pollution

Cite this

@article{7a38285df08546ada52f3488d1aa5083,
title = "Corrigendum to “Mineralizing urban net-zero water treatment: Field experience for energy-positive water management” [Water Res. 106 (2016) 352–363] (S0043135416307576)(10.1016/j.watres.2016.10.015)",
abstract = "The authors regret to inform that there are few errors in Table 5. The correct table is given below. In addition, the fourth sentence of the third paragraph of the Conclusions and recommendations section: “The energy for such peroxone mineralization represents a cost of only $0.25/m3 ($0.96/1000 gal) [assuming 2.11 kWh/m3 for mineralization of COD in secondary effluent (Wu and Englehardt, 2015) and US average $0.12/kWh electricity (US Energy Information Administration, 2013)].” should be appended as follows: “…, and total capital and operating costs for a 1 MGD peroxone plant for organics mineralization are projected at $1.14/m3 ($4.33/1000 gal) [Guo et al. 2014].” The 17th reference should be corrected and appended as follows Guo, T., Englehardt, J., Fallon, H., 2016. Modeling the economic feasibility of large-scale net-zero water management: a case study. Water Environ. Res. 88, 811-823. Reference Guo, T., Englehardt, J., and Wu, T., 2014. Review of cost versus scale: water and wastewater treatment and reuse processes. Water Sci. Technol. 69, 223-234.>. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.",
author = "Tingting Wu and Englehardt, {James Douglas}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.032",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "110",
pages = "399--400",
journal = "Water Research",
issn = "0043-1354",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corrigendum to “Mineralizing urban net-zero water treatment

T2 - Field experience for energy-positive water management” [Water Res. 106 (2016) 352–363] (S0043135416307576)(10.1016/j.watres.2016.10.015)

AU - Wu, Tingting

AU - Englehardt, James Douglas

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - The authors regret to inform that there are few errors in Table 5. The correct table is given below. In addition, the fourth sentence of the third paragraph of the Conclusions and recommendations section: “The energy for such peroxone mineralization represents a cost of only $0.25/m3 ($0.96/1000 gal) [assuming 2.11 kWh/m3 for mineralization of COD in secondary effluent (Wu and Englehardt, 2015) and US average $0.12/kWh electricity (US Energy Information Administration, 2013)].” should be appended as follows: “…, and total capital and operating costs for a 1 MGD peroxone plant for organics mineralization are projected at $1.14/m3 ($4.33/1000 gal) [Guo et al. 2014].” The 17th reference should be corrected and appended as follows Guo, T., Englehardt, J., Fallon, H., 2016. Modeling the economic feasibility of large-scale net-zero water management: a case study. Water Environ. Res. 88, 811-823. Reference Guo, T., Englehardt, J., and Wu, T., 2014. Review of cost versus scale: water and wastewater treatment and reuse processes. Water Sci. Technol. 69, 223-234.>. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

AB - The authors regret to inform that there are few errors in Table 5. The correct table is given below. In addition, the fourth sentence of the third paragraph of the Conclusions and recommendations section: “The energy for such peroxone mineralization represents a cost of only $0.25/m3 ($0.96/1000 gal) [assuming 2.11 kWh/m3 for mineralization of COD in secondary effluent (Wu and Englehardt, 2015) and US average $0.12/kWh electricity (US Energy Information Administration, 2013)].” should be appended as follows: “…, and total capital and operating costs for a 1 MGD peroxone plant for organics mineralization are projected at $1.14/m3 ($4.33/1000 gal) [Guo et al. 2014].” The 17th reference should be corrected and appended as follows Guo, T., Englehardt, J., Fallon, H., 2016. Modeling the economic feasibility of large-scale net-zero water management: a case study. Water Environ. Res. 88, 811-823. Reference Guo, T., Englehardt, J., and Wu, T., 2014. Review of cost versus scale: water and wastewater treatment and reuse processes. Water Sci. Technol. 69, 223-234.>. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011633085&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011633085&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.032

DO - 10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.032

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85011633085

VL - 110

SP - 399

EP - 400

JO - Water Research

JF - Water Research

SN - 0043-1354

ER -