Coronary computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease

Troy LaBounty, Mauro Moscucci, Ella A. Kazerooni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

• Objective: To review the current application of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). • Methods: Qualitative review of the literature. • Results: CCTA has emerged as a potential noninvasive alternative to both existing noninvasive tests for CAD in some patients and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in other patients. There have been a large number of small, single-center studies comparing CCTA with ICA for the diagnosis of significant CAD that have reported excellent sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value in patient populations with a high prevalence of CAD. These studies often exclude segments or patients who do not have complete visualization of all coronary segments and it can be particularly challenging in patients with significant coronary artery calcification, stent placement, or coronary artery bypass grafts. A few small studies have evaluated the use of CCTA in the diagnosis of chest pain in the emergency department. • Conclusion: To date, there are little data on the role of CCTA in comparison with other noninvasive tests for the diagnosis of CAD, including nuclear perfusion imaging and stress echocardiography. Given the accuracy of CCTA, it may be useful as a strategy to avoid ICA. The high negative predictive value of CCTA suggests great promise in the assessment of low- to moderate-risk patients with acute chest pain, with the potential for rapid patient triage and lower health care costs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)447-456
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Clinical Outcomes Management
Volume14
Issue number8
StatePublished - Aug 1 2007

Fingerprint

Coronary Artery Disease
Coronary Angiography
Chest Pain
Stress Echocardiography
Perfusion Imaging
Triage
Acute Pain
Computed Tomography Angiography
Computed tomography
Coronary artery disease
Coronary Artery Bypass
Health Care Costs
Stents
Hospital Emergency Service
Coronary Vessels
Transplants
Sensitivity and Specificity
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Coronary computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. / LaBounty, Troy; Moscucci, Mauro; Kazerooni, Ella A.

In: Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management, Vol. 14, No. 8, 01.08.2007, p. 447-456.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

LaBounty, Troy ; Moscucci, Mauro ; Kazerooni, Ella A. / Coronary computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. In: Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management. 2007 ; Vol. 14, No. 8. pp. 447-456.
@article{908a976b2a1d4ffda36ffa390fb58feb,
title = "Coronary computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease",
abstract = "• Objective: To review the current application of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). • Methods: Qualitative review of the literature. • Results: CCTA has emerged as a potential noninvasive alternative to both existing noninvasive tests for CAD in some patients and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in other patients. There have been a large number of small, single-center studies comparing CCTA with ICA for the diagnosis of significant CAD that have reported excellent sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value in patient populations with a high prevalence of CAD. These studies often exclude segments or patients who do not have complete visualization of all coronary segments and it can be particularly challenging in patients with significant coronary artery calcification, stent placement, or coronary artery bypass grafts. A few small studies have evaluated the use of CCTA in the diagnosis of chest pain in the emergency department. • Conclusion: To date, there are little data on the role of CCTA in comparison with other noninvasive tests for the diagnosis of CAD, including nuclear perfusion imaging and stress echocardiography. Given the accuracy of CCTA, it may be useful as a strategy to avoid ICA. The high negative predictive value of CCTA suggests great promise in the assessment of low- to moderate-risk patients with acute chest pain, with the potential for rapid patient triage and lower health care costs.",
author = "Troy LaBounty and Mauro Moscucci and Kazerooni, {Ella A.}",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "447--456",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management",
issn = "1079-6533",
publisher = "Turner White Communications Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coronary computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease

AU - LaBounty, Troy

AU - Moscucci, Mauro

AU - Kazerooni, Ella A.

PY - 2007/8/1

Y1 - 2007/8/1

N2 - • Objective: To review the current application of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). • Methods: Qualitative review of the literature. • Results: CCTA has emerged as a potential noninvasive alternative to both existing noninvasive tests for CAD in some patients and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in other patients. There have been a large number of small, single-center studies comparing CCTA with ICA for the diagnosis of significant CAD that have reported excellent sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value in patient populations with a high prevalence of CAD. These studies often exclude segments or patients who do not have complete visualization of all coronary segments and it can be particularly challenging in patients with significant coronary artery calcification, stent placement, or coronary artery bypass grafts. A few small studies have evaluated the use of CCTA in the diagnosis of chest pain in the emergency department. • Conclusion: To date, there are little data on the role of CCTA in comparison with other noninvasive tests for the diagnosis of CAD, including nuclear perfusion imaging and stress echocardiography. Given the accuracy of CCTA, it may be useful as a strategy to avoid ICA. The high negative predictive value of CCTA suggests great promise in the assessment of low- to moderate-risk patients with acute chest pain, with the potential for rapid patient triage and lower health care costs.

AB - • Objective: To review the current application of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). • Methods: Qualitative review of the literature. • Results: CCTA has emerged as a potential noninvasive alternative to both existing noninvasive tests for CAD in some patients and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in other patients. There have been a large number of small, single-center studies comparing CCTA with ICA for the diagnosis of significant CAD that have reported excellent sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value in patient populations with a high prevalence of CAD. These studies often exclude segments or patients who do not have complete visualization of all coronary segments and it can be particularly challenging in patients with significant coronary artery calcification, stent placement, or coronary artery bypass grafts. A few small studies have evaluated the use of CCTA in the diagnosis of chest pain in the emergency department. • Conclusion: To date, there are little data on the role of CCTA in comparison with other noninvasive tests for the diagnosis of CAD, including nuclear perfusion imaging and stress echocardiography. Given the accuracy of CCTA, it may be useful as a strategy to avoid ICA. The high negative predictive value of CCTA suggests great promise in the assessment of low- to moderate-risk patients with acute chest pain, with the potential for rapid patient triage and lower health care costs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36649024592&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36649024592&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:36649024592

VL - 14

SP - 447

EP - 456

JO - Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management

JF - Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management

SN - 1079-6533

IS - 8

ER -