Controversies in the surgical treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms

The first annual J. Lawrence pool memorial research symposium - Controversies in the management of cerebral aneurysms

Ricardo J Komotar, Brad E. Zacharia, J. Mocco, E. Sander Connolly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

THE MANAGEMENT OF aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage has evolved over time, including the use of the microscope for aneurysm clip application, improved imaging modalities, endovascular methods for aneurysm treatment, dedicated neurointensive care units, and more aggressive therapy for cerebral vasospasm. Although these advancements have reduced the morbidity and mortality associated with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, outcomes for this patient population continue to leave much room for improvement. This work highlights controversial adjuvant techniques, maneuvers, and therapies surrounding the surgical treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms that currently lack a consensus opinion. These treatments include centralized care in high-volume centers, as well as the use of antifibrinolytic therapy, routine cerebrospinal fluid diversion, intraoperative hypothermia, temporary clip application, neuroprotective drugs, intraoperative angiography, and decompressive hemicraniectomy. Although definitive answers will only be possible through future multicenter collaboration, we review the controversy surrounding these adjuncts and report the consensus opinion from a highly experienced audience.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)396-405
Number of pages10
JournalNeurosurgery
Volume62
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ruptured Aneurysm
Intracranial Aneurysm
Research
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Surgical Instruments
Aneurysm
Therapeutics
Intracranial Vasospasm
Antifibrinolytic Agents
Neuroprotective Agents
Hypothermia
Cerebrospinal Fluid
Angiography
Morbidity
Mortality
Population

Keywords

  • Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
  • Antifibrinolytic therapy
  • Centralized care
  • Cerebral aneurysm
  • Hemicraniectomy
  • Hypothermia
  • Neuroprotection
  • Temporary clip

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Controversies in the surgical treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms : The first annual J. Lawrence pool memorial research symposium - Controversies in the management of cerebral aneurysms. / Komotar, Ricardo J; Zacharia, Brad E.; Mocco, J.; Connolly, E. Sander.

In: Neurosurgery, Vol. 62, No. 2, 01.02.2008, p. 396-405.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a3939ea436c6494db4d13bb70b502adf,
title = "Controversies in the surgical treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: The first annual J. Lawrence pool memorial research symposium - Controversies in the management of cerebral aneurysms",
abstract = "THE MANAGEMENT OF aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage has evolved over time, including the use of the microscope for aneurysm clip application, improved imaging modalities, endovascular methods for aneurysm treatment, dedicated neurointensive care units, and more aggressive therapy for cerebral vasospasm. Although these advancements have reduced the morbidity and mortality associated with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, outcomes for this patient population continue to leave much room for improvement. This work highlights controversial adjuvant techniques, maneuvers, and therapies surrounding the surgical treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms that currently lack a consensus opinion. These treatments include centralized care in high-volume centers, as well as the use of antifibrinolytic therapy, routine cerebrospinal fluid diversion, intraoperative hypothermia, temporary clip application, neuroprotective drugs, intraoperative angiography, and decompressive hemicraniectomy. Although definitive answers will only be possible through future multicenter collaboration, we review the controversy surrounding these adjuncts and report the consensus opinion from a highly experienced audience.",
keywords = "Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, Antifibrinolytic therapy, Centralized care, Cerebral aneurysm, Hemicraniectomy, Hypothermia, Neuroprotection, Temporary clip",
author = "Komotar, {Ricardo J} and Zacharia, {Brad E.} and J. Mocco and Connolly, {E. Sander}",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1227/01.neu.0000316006.26635.b0",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "396--405",
journal = "Neurosurgery",
issn = "0148-396X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Controversies in the surgical treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms

T2 - The first annual J. Lawrence pool memorial research symposium - Controversies in the management of cerebral aneurysms

AU - Komotar, Ricardo J

AU - Zacharia, Brad E.

AU - Mocco, J.

AU - Connolly, E. Sander

PY - 2008/2/1

Y1 - 2008/2/1

N2 - THE MANAGEMENT OF aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage has evolved over time, including the use of the microscope for aneurysm clip application, improved imaging modalities, endovascular methods for aneurysm treatment, dedicated neurointensive care units, and more aggressive therapy for cerebral vasospasm. Although these advancements have reduced the morbidity and mortality associated with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, outcomes for this patient population continue to leave much room for improvement. This work highlights controversial adjuvant techniques, maneuvers, and therapies surrounding the surgical treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms that currently lack a consensus opinion. These treatments include centralized care in high-volume centers, as well as the use of antifibrinolytic therapy, routine cerebrospinal fluid diversion, intraoperative hypothermia, temporary clip application, neuroprotective drugs, intraoperative angiography, and decompressive hemicraniectomy. Although definitive answers will only be possible through future multicenter collaboration, we review the controversy surrounding these adjuncts and report the consensus opinion from a highly experienced audience.

AB - THE MANAGEMENT OF aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage has evolved over time, including the use of the microscope for aneurysm clip application, improved imaging modalities, endovascular methods for aneurysm treatment, dedicated neurointensive care units, and more aggressive therapy for cerebral vasospasm. Although these advancements have reduced the morbidity and mortality associated with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, outcomes for this patient population continue to leave much room for improvement. This work highlights controversial adjuvant techniques, maneuvers, and therapies surrounding the surgical treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms that currently lack a consensus opinion. These treatments include centralized care in high-volume centers, as well as the use of antifibrinolytic therapy, routine cerebrospinal fluid diversion, intraoperative hypothermia, temporary clip application, neuroprotective drugs, intraoperative angiography, and decompressive hemicraniectomy. Although definitive answers will only be possible through future multicenter collaboration, we review the controversy surrounding these adjuncts and report the consensus opinion from a highly experienced audience.

KW - Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

KW - Antifibrinolytic therapy

KW - Centralized care

KW - Cerebral aneurysm

KW - Hemicraniectomy

KW - Hypothermia

KW - Neuroprotection

KW - Temporary clip

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41749107687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41749107687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1227/01.neu.0000316006.26635.b0

DO - 10.1227/01.neu.0000316006.26635.b0

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 396

EP - 405

JO - Neurosurgery

JF - Neurosurgery

SN - 0148-396X

IS - 2

ER -