Abstract
We describe the construction of a Job in General (JIG) scale, a global scale to accompany the facet scales of the Job Descriptive Index. We applied both traditional and item response theory procedures for item analysis to data from three large heterogeneous samples (N = 1,149, 3,566, and 4,490). Alpha was .91 and above for the resulting 18-item scale in successive samples. Convergent and discriminant validity and differential response to treatments were demonstrated. Global scales are contrasted with composite and with facet scales in psychological measurement. We show that global scales are not equivalent to summated facet scales. Both facet and global scales were useful in another organization (N = 648). Some principles are suggested for choosing specific (facet), composite, or global measures for practical and theoretical problems. The correlations between global and facet scales suggest that work may be the most important facet in relation to general job satisfaction.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 193-200 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Journal of Applied Psychology |
| Volume | 74 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| State | Published - Apr 1 1989 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Applied Psychology
Cite this
Construction of a Job in General Scale : A Comparison of Global, Composite, and Specific Measures. / Ironson, Gail; Smith, P. C.; Brannick, M. T.; Gibson, W. M.; Paul, K. B.
In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 74, No. 2, 01.04.1989, p. 193-200.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Construction of a Job in General Scale
T2 - A Comparison of Global, Composite, and Specific Measures
AU - Ironson, Gail
AU - Smith, P. C.
AU - Brannick, M. T.
AU - Gibson, W. M.
AU - Paul, K. B.
PY - 1989/4/1
Y1 - 1989/4/1
N2 - We describe the construction of a Job in General (JIG) scale, a global scale to accompany the facet scales of the Job Descriptive Index. We applied both traditional and item response theory procedures for item analysis to data from three large heterogeneous samples (N = 1,149, 3,566, and 4,490). Alpha was .91 and above for the resulting 18-item scale in successive samples. Convergent and discriminant validity and differential response to treatments were demonstrated. Global scales are contrasted with composite and with facet scales in psychological measurement. We show that global scales are not equivalent to summated facet scales. Both facet and global scales were useful in another organization (N = 648). Some principles are suggested for choosing specific (facet), composite, or global measures for practical and theoretical problems. The correlations between global and facet scales suggest that work may be the most important facet in relation to general job satisfaction.
AB - We describe the construction of a Job in General (JIG) scale, a global scale to accompany the facet scales of the Job Descriptive Index. We applied both traditional and item response theory procedures for item analysis to data from three large heterogeneous samples (N = 1,149, 3,566, and 4,490). Alpha was .91 and above for the resulting 18-item scale in successive samples. Convergent and discriminant validity and differential response to treatments were demonstrated. Global scales are contrasted with composite and with facet scales in psychological measurement. We show that global scales are not equivalent to summated facet scales. Both facet and global scales were useful in another organization (N = 648). Some principles are suggested for choosing specific (facet), composite, or global measures for practical and theoretical problems. The correlations between global and facet scales suggest that work may be the most important facet in relation to general job satisfaction.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000867335&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000867335&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0000867335
VL - 74
SP - 193
EP - 200
JO - Journal of Applied Psychology
JF - Journal of Applied Psychology
SN - 0021-9010
IS - 2
ER -