Construction of a Job in General Scale: A Comparison of Global, Composite, and Specific Measures

Gail Ironson, P. C. Smith, M. T. Brannick, W. M. Gibson, K. B. Paul

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

386 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We describe the construction of a Job in General (JIG) scale, a global scale to accompany the facet scales of the Job Descriptive Index. We applied both traditional and item response theory procedures for item analysis to data from three large heterogeneous samples (N = 1,149, 3,566, and 4,490). Alpha was .91 and above for the resulting 18-item scale in successive samples. Convergent and discriminant validity and differential response to treatments were demonstrated. Global scales are contrasted with composite and with facet scales in psychological measurement. We show that global scales are not equivalent to summated facet scales. Both facet and global scales were useful in another organization (N = 648). Some principles are suggested for choosing specific (facet), composite, or global measures for practical and theoretical problems. The correlations between global and facet scales suggest that work may be the most important facet in relation to general job satisfaction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)193-200
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume74
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 1 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Job Satisfaction
Psychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Construction of a Job in General Scale : A Comparison of Global, Composite, and Specific Measures. / Ironson, Gail; Smith, P. C.; Brannick, M. T.; Gibson, W. M.; Paul, K. B.

In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 74, No. 2, 01.04.1989, p. 193-200.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ironson, Gail ; Smith, P. C. ; Brannick, M. T. ; Gibson, W. M. ; Paul, K. B. / Construction of a Job in General Scale : A Comparison of Global, Composite, and Specific Measures. In: Journal of Applied Psychology. 1989 ; Vol. 74, No. 2. pp. 193-200.
@article{5161162b98be45e5a555d0946703c9ac,
title = "Construction of a Job in General Scale: A Comparison of Global, Composite, and Specific Measures",
abstract = "We describe the construction of a Job in General (JIG) scale, a global scale to accompany the facet scales of the Job Descriptive Index. We applied both traditional and item response theory procedures for item analysis to data from three large heterogeneous samples (N = 1,149, 3,566, and 4,490). Alpha was .91 and above for the resulting 18-item scale in successive samples. Convergent and discriminant validity and differential response to treatments were demonstrated. Global scales are contrasted with composite and with facet scales in psychological measurement. We show that global scales are not equivalent to summated facet scales. Both facet and global scales were useful in another organization (N = 648). Some principles are suggested for choosing specific (facet), composite, or global measures for practical and theoretical problems. The correlations between global and facet scales suggest that work may be the most important facet in relation to general job satisfaction.",
author = "Gail Ironson and Smith, {P. C.} and Brannick, {M. T.} and Gibson, {W. M.} and Paul, {K. B.}",
year = "1989",
month = "4",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
pages = "193--200",
journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
issn = "0021-9010",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Construction of a Job in General Scale

T2 - A Comparison of Global, Composite, and Specific Measures

AU - Ironson, Gail

AU - Smith, P. C.

AU - Brannick, M. T.

AU - Gibson, W. M.

AU - Paul, K. B.

PY - 1989/4/1

Y1 - 1989/4/1

N2 - We describe the construction of a Job in General (JIG) scale, a global scale to accompany the facet scales of the Job Descriptive Index. We applied both traditional and item response theory procedures for item analysis to data from three large heterogeneous samples (N = 1,149, 3,566, and 4,490). Alpha was .91 and above for the resulting 18-item scale in successive samples. Convergent and discriminant validity and differential response to treatments were demonstrated. Global scales are contrasted with composite and with facet scales in psychological measurement. We show that global scales are not equivalent to summated facet scales. Both facet and global scales were useful in another organization (N = 648). Some principles are suggested for choosing specific (facet), composite, or global measures for practical and theoretical problems. The correlations between global and facet scales suggest that work may be the most important facet in relation to general job satisfaction.

AB - We describe the construction of a Job in General (JIG) scale, a global scale to accompany the facet scales of the Job Descriptive Index. We applied both traditional and item response theory procedures for item analysis to data from three large heterogeneous samples (N = 1,149, 3,566, and 4,490). Alpha was .91 and above for the resulting 18-item scale in successive samples. Convergent and discriminant validity and differential response to treatments were demonstrated. Global scales are contrasted with composite and with facet scales in psychological measurement. We show that global scales are not equivalent to summated facet scales. Both facet and global scales were useful in another organization (N = 648). Some principles are suggested for choosing specific (facet), composite, or global measures for practical and theoretical problems. The correlations between global and facet scales suggest that work may be the most important facet in relation to general job satisfaction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000867335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000867335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0000867335

VL - 74

SP - 193

EP - 200

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

SN - 0021-9010

IS - 2

ER -