Construct Validity of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) in Adults With Lower Limb Amputation

Brian J. Hafner, Ignacio Gaunaurd, Sara J. Morgan, Dagmar Amtmann, Rana Salem, Robert Gailey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To assess construct validity of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M), a self-report mobility measure for people with lower limb amputation (LLA). Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Private prosthetic clinics (n=37). Participants Current lower limb prosthesis users (N=199; mean age ± SD, 55.4±14.3y; 71.4% men) were assessed before receiving a replacement prosthesis, prosthetic socket, and/or prosthetic knee. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Convergent construct validity was examined using correlations between participants’ PLUS-M T-scores and measures of physical function, mobility, and balance, including the Amputee Mobility Predictor (AMP), timed Up and Go (TUG), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System–Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire–Mobility Subscale (PEQ-MS), and Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. Known-groups construct validity was evaluated by comparing differences in PLUS-M T-scores among participants grouped by Medicare Functional Classification Level (MFCL). Results PLUS-M T-scores demonstrated a moderate positive relationship with AMP scores (ρ=.54, P<.001) and a moderate negative relationship with TUG times (ρ=−.56, P<.001). The PLUS-M also showed a strong positive relationship with PEQ-MS scores (ρ=.78, P<.001), ABC Scale scores (ρ=.81, P<.001), and PROMIS-PF T-scores (ρ=.81, P<.001). Significant differences (P<.05) in PLUS-M T-scores were found among groups of people classified by different MFCLs. Conclusions Study results support the validity of the PLUS-M as a self-report measure of prosthetic mobility. Correlations between PLUS-M and measures of physical function, mobility, and balance indicate convergent construct validity. Similarly, significant differences in PLUS-M T-scores across MFCL groups provide evidence of known-groups construct validity. In summary, evidence indicates that PLUS-M has good construct validity among people with LLA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)277-285
Number of pages9
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume98
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017

Fingerprint

Amputation
Lower Extremity
Extremities
Prostheses and Implants
Amputees
Medicare
Self Report
Surveys and Questionnaires
Reproducibility of Results
Knee
Cross-Sectional Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Amputation
  • Artificial limbs
  • Motor activity
  • Movement
  • Outcome assessment (health care)
  • Rehabilitation
  • Self report

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Construct Validity of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) in Adults With Lower Limb Amputation. / Hafner, Brian J.; Gaunaurd, Ignacio; Morgan, Sara J.; Amtmann, Dagmar; Salem, Rana; Gailey, Robert.

In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 98, No. 2, 01.02.2017, p. 277-285.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hafner, Brian J. ; Gaunaurd, Ignacio ; Morgan, Sara J. ; Amtmann, Dagmar ; Salem, Rana ; Gailey, Robert. / Construct Validity of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) in Adults With Lower Limb Amputation. In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2017 ; Vol. 98, No. 2. pp. 277-285.
@article{9611778938e7481b950ae5b2a94395ff,
title = "Construct Validity of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) in Adults With Lower Limb Amputation",
abstract = "Objective To assess construct validity of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M), a self-report mobility measure for people with lower limb amputation (LLA). Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Private prosthetic clinics (n=37). Participants Current lower limb prosthesis users (N=199; mean age ± SD, 55.4±14.3y; 71.4{\%} men) were assessed before receiving a replacement prosthesis, prosthetic socket, and/or prosthetic knee. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Convergent construct validity was examined using correlations between participants’ PLUS-M T-scores and measures of physical function, mobility, and balance, including the Amputee Mobility Predictor (AMP), timed Up and Go (TUG), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System–Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire–Mobility Subscale (PEQ-MS), and Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. Known-groups construct validity was evaluated by comparing differences in PLUS-M T-scores among participants grouped by Medicare Functional Classification Level (MFCL). Results PLUS-M T-scores demonstrated a moderate positive relationship with AMP scores (ρ=.54, P<.001) and a moderate negative relationship with TUG times (ρ=−.56, P<.001). The PLUS-M also showed a strong positive relationship with PEQ-MS scores (ρ=.78, P<.001), ABC Scale scores (ρ=.81, P<.001), and PROMIS-PF T-scores (ρ=.81, P<.001). Significant differences (P<.05) in PLUS-M T-scores were found among groups of people classified by different MFCLs. Conclusions Study results support the validity of the PLUS-M as a self-report measure of prosthetic mobility. Correlations between PLUS-M and measures of physical function, mobility, and balance indicate convergent construct validity. Similarly, significant differences in PLUS-M T-scores across MFCL groups provide evidence of known-groups construct validity. In summary, evidence indicates that PLUS-M has good construct validity among people with LLA.",
keywords = "Amputation, Artificial limbs, Motor activity, Movement, Outcome assessment (health care), Rehabilitation, Self report",
author = "Hafner, {Brian J.} and Ignacio Gaunaurd and Morgan, {Sara J.} and Dagmar Amtmann and Rana Salem and Robert Gailey",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.apmr.2016.07.026",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "98",
pages = "277--285",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Construct Validity of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) in Adults With Lower Limb Amputation

AU - Hafner, Brian J.

AU - Gaunaurd, Ignacio

AU - Morgan, Sara J.

AU - Amtmann, Dagmar

AU - Salem, Rana

AU - Gailey, Robert

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Objective To assess construct validity of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M), a self-report mobility measure for people with lower limb amputation (LLA). Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Private prosthetic clinics (n=37). Participants Current lower limb prosthesis users (N=199; mean age ± SD, 55.4±14.3y; 71.4% men) were assessed before receiving a replacement prosthesis, prosthetic socket, and/or prosthetic knee. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Convergent construct validity was examined using correlations between participants’ PLUS-M T-scores and measures of physical function, mobility, and balance, including the Amputee Mobility Predictor (AMP), timed Up and Go (TUG), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System–Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire–Mobility Subscale (PEQ-MS), and Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. Known-groups construct validity was evaluated by comparing differences in PLUS-M T-scores among participants grouped by Medicare Functional Classification Level (MFCL). Results PLUS-M T-scores demonstrated a moderate positive relationship with AMP scores (ρ=.54, P<.001) and a moderate negative relationship with TUG times (ρ=−.56, P<.001). The PLUS-M also showed a strong positive relationship with PEQ-MS scores (ρ=.78, P<.001), ABC Scale scores (ρ=.81, P<.001), and PROMIS-PF T-scores (ρ=.81, P<.001). Significant differences (P<.05) in PLUS-M T-scores were found among groups of people classified by different MFCLs. Conclusions Study results support the validity of the PLUS-M as a self-report measure of prosthetic mobility. Correlations between PLUS-M and measures of physical function, mobility, and balance indicate convergent construct validity. Similarly, significant differences in PLUS-M T-scores across MFCL groups provide evidence of known-groups construct validity. In summary, evidence indicates that PLUS-M has good construct validity among people with LLA.

AB - Objective To assess construct validity of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M), a self-report mobility measure for people with lower limb amputation (LLA). Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Private prosthetic clinics (n=37). Participants Current lower limb prosthesis users (N=199; mean age ± SD, 55.4±14.3y; 71.4% men) were assessed before receiving a replacement prosthesis, prosthetic socket, and/or prosthetic knee. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Convergent construct validity was examined using correlations between participants’ PLUS-M T-scores and measures of physical function, mobility, and balance, including the Amputee Mobility Predictor (AMP), timed Up and Go (TUG), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System–Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire–Mobility Subscale (PEQ-MS), and Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. Known-groups construct validity was evaluated by comparing differences in PLUS-M T-scores among participants grouped by Medicare Functional Classification Level (MFCL). Results PLUS-M T-scores demonstrated a moderate positive relationship with AMP scores (ρ=.54, P<.001) and a moderate negative relationship with TUG times (ρ=−.56, P<.001). The PLUS-M also showed a strong positive relationship with PEQ-MS scores (ρ=.78, P<.001), ABC Scale scores (ρ=.81, P<.001), and PROMIS-PF T-scores (ρ=.81, P<.001). Significant differences (P<.05) in PLUS-M T-scores were found among groups of people classified by different MFCLs. Conclusions Study results support the validity of the PLUS-M as a self-report measure of prosthetic mobility. Correlations between PLUS-M and measures of physical function, mobility, and balance indicate convergent construct validity. Similarly, significant differences in PLUS-M T-scores across MFCL groups provide evidence of known-groups construct validity. In summary, evidence indicates that PLUS-M has good construct validity among people with LLA.

KW - Amputation

KW - Artificial limbs

KW - Motor activity

KW - Movement

KW - Outcome assessment (health care)

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Self report

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006106434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006106434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.07.026

DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.07.026

M3 - Article

C2 - 27590443

AN - SCOPUS:85006106434

VL - 98

SP - 277

EP - 285

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 2

ER -