Eine überprüfung der konstruktvalidität des Fragebogens irrationaler Einstellungen (FIE)

Translated title of the contribution: Construct validity of the Fragebogen irrationaler Einstellungen (FIE)

Jutta Joormann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The evaluation of the scientific status of vulnerability-stress models of different cognitive therapy approaches as well as therapy outcome and process research require the valid measurement of the underlying cognitive constructs. Previous research on the assessment of these constructs usually led to negative conclusions regarding the discriminant validity of self-report measures. In the present study an attempt is made to evaluate a German questionnaire for the assessment of irrational beliefs, the "Fragebogen irrationaler Einstellungen" (FIE), in this respect the FIE was given to a nonclinical sample along with measures of dysfunctional attitudes, state-trait anxiety, and social anxiety. Several models with different factor structures were postulated to account for scale covariances. These Models were evaluated and compared using confirmatory factor analysis. Although superior fit of a single factor model was not found, results show high intercorrelations of all measures employed, indicating a lack of discriminant validity. The implications of these results for the assessment of cognitive vulnerability are discussed.

Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)201-208
Number of pages8
JournalDiagnostica
Volume44
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 1 1998

Fingerprint

Anxiety
Cognitive Therapy
Self Report
Statistical Factor Analysis
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Research
Therapeutics
Surveys and Questionnaires
Sociological Factors

Keywords

  • Anxiety
  • Cognitive therapy
  • Construct validity
  • Factor analysis
  • Irrational beliefs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Eine überprüfung der konstruktvalidität des Fragebogens irrationaler Einstellungen (FIE). / Joormann, Jutta.

In: Diagnostica, Vol. 44, No. 4, 01.12.1998, p. 201-208.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{effaecb6621d45d0a6cfddd3f7adea43,
title = "Eine {\"u}berpr{\"u}fung der konstruktvalidit{\"a}t des Fragebogens irrationaler Einstellungen (FIE)",
abstract = "The evaluation of the scientific status of vulnerability-stress models of different cognitive therapy approaches as well as therapy outcome and process research require the valid measurement of the underlying cognitive constructs. Previous research on the assessment of these constructs usually led to negative conclusions regarding the discriminant validity of self-report measures. In the present study an attempt is made to evaluate a German questionnaire for the assessment of irrational beliefs, the {"}Fragebogen irrationaler Einstellungen{"} (FIE), in this respect the FIE was given to a nonclinical sample along with measures of dysfunctional attitudes, state-trait anxiety, and social anxiety. Several models with different factor structures were postulated to account for scale covariances. These Models were evaluated and compared using confirmatory factor analysis. Although superior fit of a single factor model was not found, results show high intercorrelations of all measures employed, indicating a lack of discriminant validity. The implications of these results for the assessment of cognitive vulnerability are discussed.",
keywords = "Anxiety, Cognitive therapy, Construct validity, Factor analysis, Irrational beliefs",
author = "Jutta Joormann",
year = "1998",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "German",
volume = "44",
pages = "201--208",
journal = "Diagnostica",
issn = "0012-1924",
publisher = "Hogrefe Publishing",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Eine überprüfung der konstruktvalidität des Fragebogens irrationaler Einstellungen (FIE)

AU - Joormann, Jutta

PY - 1998/12/1

Y1 - 1998/12/1

N2 - The evaluation of the scientific status of vulnerability-stress models of different cognitive therapy approaches as well as therapy outcome and process research require the valid measurement of the underlying cognitive constructs. Previous research on the assessment of these constructs usually led to negative conclusions regarding the discriminant validity of self-report measures. In the present study an attempt is made to evaluate a German questionnaire for the assessment of irrational beliefs, the "Fragebogen irrationaler Einstellungen" (FIE), in this respect the FIE was given to a nonclinical sample along with measures of dysfunctional attitudes, state-trait anxiety, and social anxiety. Several models with different factor structures were postulated to account for scale covariances. These Models were evaluated and compared using confirmatory factor analysis. Although superior fit of a single factor model was not found, results show high intercorrelations of all measures employed, indicating a lack of discriminant validity. The implications of these results for the assessment of cognitive vulnerability are discussed.

AB - The evaluation of the scientific status of vulnerability-stress models of different cognitive therapy approaches as well as therapy outcome and process research require the valid measurement of the underlying cognitive constructs. Previous research on the assessment of these constructs usually led to negative conclusions regarding the discriminant validity of self-report measures. In the present study an attempt is made to evaluate a German questionnaire for the assessment of irrational beliefs, the "Fragebogen irrationaler Einstellungen" (FIE), in this respect the FIE was given to a nonclinical sample along with measures of dysfunctional attitudes, state-trait anxiety, and social anxiety. Several models with different factor structures were postulated to account for scale covariances. These Models were evaluated and compared using confirmatory factor analysis. Although superior fit of a single factor model was not found, results show high intercorrelations of all measures employed, indicating a lack of discriminant validity. The implications of these results for the assessment of cognitive vulnerability are discussed.

KW - Anxiety

KW - Cognitive therapy

KW - Construct validity

KW - Factor analysis

KW - Irrational beliefs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3042885614&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3042885614&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 201

EP - 208

JO - Diagnostica

JF - Diagnostica

SN - 0012-1924

IS - 4

ER -