Consequences of third-person perception in support of press restrictions in the O. J. Simpson trial

Michael B. Salwen, Paul D. Driscoll

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

76 Scopus citations

Abstract

A nationwide telephone survey about the O. J. Simpson trial affirmed the third-person effect perceptual-bias hypothesis that people perceive news media coverage to exert greater influence on other people than on themselves. The study did not indicate an association between third-person perception and support for restrictions on press coverage of the trial. The findings suggested that respondents' opinions about Simpson's guilt interacted with the third-person effect and that perceptual bias remains a fruitful, although complex, predictor of support for press restrictions. It was suggested that people perceive issues as legitimate or illegitimate topics of public discourse, and that issue legitimacy may be associated with willingness to support press restrictions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)60-78
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Communication
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Consequences of third-person perception in support of press restrictions in the O. J. Simpson trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this