Consequences of adopting an expanded auditor’s report in the United Kingdom

Elizabeth Gutierrez, Miguel Minutti-Meza, Kay Tatum, Maria Vulcheva

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The United Kingdom has recently required an expanded auditor’s report for large public companies. We investigate whether this requirement is associated with an increase in the decision usefulness of the auditor’s report and whether it has indirect consequences on audit fees and quality. Our analyses cover four years surrounding the changes, including companies that transitioned to the new regime and companies that continued issuing the previous report’s format. We do not find evidence that the regulatory change significantly affected investors’ reaction to the release of auditors’ reports, audit fees, or audit quality. Furthermore, we do not find that variation in the expanded reports’ content has affected these outcomes. Although companies with long reports pay comparatively higher fees, the mere increase in disclosure does not affect audit fees or quality. Collectively, our evidence is consistent with the expanded auditor’s report providing little incremental information to investors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1543-1587
Number of pages45
JournalReview of Accounting Studies
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

Auditors
Audit quality
Audit fees
Investors
Disclosure
Usefulness
Regulatory change
Incremental
Fees

Keywords

  • Audit fees
  • Audit opinion
  • Audit quality
  • Auditor report
  • Market reaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

Consequences of adopting an expanded auditor’s report in the United Kingdom. / Gutierrez, Elizabeth; Minutti-Meza, Miguel; Tatum, Kay; Vulcheva, Maria.

In: Review of Accounting Studies, Vol. 23, No. 4, 01.12.2018, p. 1543-1587.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a11bce3f4fdf4fca8be7f3d5929de1bf,
title = "Consequences of adopting an expanded auditor’s report in the United Kingdom",
abstract = "The United Kingdom has recently required an expanded auditor’s report for large public companies. We investigate whether this requirement is associated with an increase in the decision usefulness of the auditor’s report and whether it has indirect consequences on audit fees and quality. Our analyses cover four years surrounding the changes, including companies that transitioned to the new regime and companies that continued issuing the previous report’s format. We do not find evidence that the regulatory change significantly affected investors’ reaction to the release of auditors’ reports, audit fees, or audit quality. Furthermore, we do not find that variation in the expanded reports’ content has affected these outcomes. Although companies with long reports pay comparatively higher fees, the mere increase in disclosure does not affect audit fees or quality. Collectively, our evidence is consistent with the expanded auditor’s report providing little incremental information to investors.",
keywords = "Audit fees, Audit opinion, Audit quality, Auditor report, Market reaction",
author = "Elizabeth Gutierrez and Miguel Minutti-Meza and Kay Tatum and Maria Vulcheva",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11142-018-9464-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "1543--1587",
journal = "Review of Accounting Studies",
issn = "1380-6653",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consequences of adopting an expanded auditor’s report in the United Kingdom

AU - Gutierrez, Elizabeth

AU - Minutti-Meza, Miguel

AU - Tatum, Kay

AU - Vulcheva, Maria

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - The United Kingdom has recently required an expanded auditor’s report for large public companies. We investigate whether this requirement is associated with an increase in the decision usefulness of the auditor’s report and whether it has indirect consequences on audit fees and quality. Our analyses cover four years surrounding the changes, including companies that transitioned to the new regime and companies that continued issuing the previous report’s format. We do not find evidence that the regulatory change significantly affected investors’ reaction to the release of auditors’ reports, audit fees, or audit quality. Furthermore, we do not find that variation in the expanded reports’ content has affected these outcomes. Although companies with long reports pay comparatively higher fees, the mere increase in disclosure does not affect audit fees or quality. Collectively, our evidence is consistent with the expanded auditor’s report providing little incremental information to investors.

AB - The United Kingdom has recently required an expanded auditor’s report for large public companies. We investigate whether this requirement is associated with an increase in the decision usefulness of the auditor’s report and whether it has indirect consequences on audit fees and quality. Our analyses cover four years surrounding the changes, including companies that transitioned to the new regime and companies that continued issuing the previous report’s format. We do not find evidence that the regulatory change significantly affected investors’ reaction to the release of auditors’ reports, audit fees, or audit quality. Furthermore, we do not find that variation in the expanded reports’ content has affected these outcomes. Although companies with long reports pay comparatively higher fees, the mere increase in disclosure does not affect audit fees or quality. Collectively, our evidence is consistent with the expanded auditor’s report providing little incremental information to investors.

KW - Audit fees

KW - Audit opinion

KW - Audit quality

KW - Auditor report

KW - Market reaction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051104685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051104685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11142-018-9464-0

DO - 10.1007/s11142-018-9464-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85051104685

VL - 23

SP - 1543

EP - 1587

JO - Review of Accounting Studies

JF - Review of Accounting Studies

SN - 1380-6653

IS - 4

ER -