Conductance fluctuations from the inactivation process of sodium channels in myelinated nerve fibres

F. Conti, B. Neumcke, W. Nonner, R. Stämpfli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Scopus citations


Na currents and fluctuations of Na currents were studied under voltage clamp in the same myelinated nerve fibres of Rana esculenta at 13°C. The results were used to test several kinetic models for the gating process of Na channels. Long voltage pulses, depolarizing the membrane by 16-48 mV from a hyperpolarizing holding level of -28 mV, were applied in 4 sec intervals. The d.c. and a.c. components of the membrane current were recorded during the last 328 msec of the 473 msec pulses. For each depolarization, ninety-six trials were made with the node in Ringer solution and, again, after adding 300 nM-tetrodotoxin (TTX) in that solution. The TTX-sensitive d.c. component declined during the 328 msec records by 14-51% of its time average. The a.c. component was corrected for this trend by subtracting the first from the second of each pair of subsequent records. The TTX-sensitive part of its variance declined, on the average, in parallel to the current, as if the open probability rather than the conductance of the individual Na channels was reduced by a slow process. Single-channel conductances, γ, were calculated on the assumption that Na channels have only non-zero conductance and were corrected for the limited band width (5 kHz) of the a.c. records. Values of γ increased slightly (< 30% from 16 to 40 mV), and averaged 8.85 ± 0.7 pS (S.E. of mean, seventeen measurements on ten fibres). This small degree of change in γ suggests that deviations from the all-or-none gating are very small. Power spectral densities of the fluctuations between 3 Hz and 5 kHz were calculated from the trend-free a.c. records and corrected for the TTX-insensitive noise component. Control calculations showed that the only effect of the nonstationarity in the Na current was to enhance the low-frequency points of such spectra by less than 10%. The spectra revealed at least two Lorentzian components with cut-off frequencies in the range expected from the activation and inactivation kinetics. The low-frequency component became dominant as depolarization was increased. Na currents recorded during brief (< 40 msec) depolarizations were analysed in terms of various all-or-none gating models, in which inactivation either was independent of activation (Hodgkin-Huxley (HH) model) or could occur only from the partly or fully activated states (coupled models.) The transient Na currents were reproduced by all models. With the parameters from such fits, the fluctuation spectra expected for each model were calculated. The predictions differed in the fraction, r(h), of the variance contributed by the slow (inactivation) fluctuations; r(h) was larger in the coupled models than in the HH model. The experimental spectra were divided into two spectral components to yield empirical values for r(h). We used as templates the spectral curves derived for the fast and for the slow fluctuations of the HH model. The empirical r(h) values were one (48 mV) to four (16 mV) times larger than those expected for the HH model. They were also larger than the theoretical r(h) of the coupled models at the small depolarizations, but became equal or smaller than those at the largest depolarization. Direct comparison of the measured and theoretical spectra revealed the same discrepancies. We conclude that all of the simple gating models considered in this paper are inconsistent with the fluctuation measurements, the coupled models giving slightly smaller deviations than the model with independent activation and inactivation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)217-239
Number of pages23
JournalThe Journal of Physiology
Issue number1
StatePublished - Nov 1 1980

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology


Dive into the research topics of 'Conductance fluctuations from the inactivation process of sodium channels in myelinated nerve fibres'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this