Complications of 761 short-term intrathecal macrocatheters in obstetric patients: A retrospective review of cases over a 12-year period

Jennifer Cohn, Daria Moaveni, J. Sznol, Jayanthie Ranasinghe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background A continuous spinal catheter is a reliable alternative to standard neuraxial techniques in obstetric anesthesia. Despite the potential advantages of intrathecal catheters, they remain underutilized due to fear of infection, nerve damage or post-dural puncture headache. In our tertiary care center, intrathecal catheters are either placed intentionally in high-risk obstetric patients or following inadvertent dural puncture using a 19-gauge macrocatheter passed through a 17-gauge epidural needle. Methods A retrospective review of 761 intrathecal catheters placed from 2001 to 2012 was conducted. An institutional obstetric anesthesia database was used to identify patients with intrathecal catheters. Medical records were reviewed for procedural details and complications. Results There were no serious complications, including meningitis, epidural or spinal abscess, hematoma, arachnoiditis, or cauda equina syndrome, associated with intrathecal catheters. The failure rates were 2.8% (3/108) for intentional placements and 6.1% (40/653) for placements following accidental dural puncture. The incidence of post-dural puncture headache was 41% (312/761) and the epidural blood patch rate was 31% (97/312). Conclusions This review demonstrates that intrathecal catheters are dependable and an option for labor analgesia and surgical anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Serious long-lasting complications are rare.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)30-36
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume25
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

Obstetrics
Catheters
Post-Dural Puncture Headache
Obstetrical Anesthesia
Punctures
Epidural Blood Patch
Arachnoiditis
Polyradiculopathy
Epidural Abscess
Anesthesia and Analgesia
Meningitis
Tertiary Care Centers
Hematoma
Fear
Needles
Medical Records
Databases
Incidence
Infection

Keywords

  • Continuous spinal catheter
  • Intrathecal catheter
  • Labor pain
  • Obstetric anesthesia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Complications of 761 short-term intrathecal macrocatheters in obstetric patients : A retrospective review of cases over a 12-year period. / Cohn, Jennifer; Moaveni, Daria; Sznol, J.; Ranasinghe, Jayanthie.

In: International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, Vol. 25, 01.02.2016, p. 30-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{091e4553e64c4d319e9e9f62a43af7d3,
title = "Complications of 761 short-term intrathecal macrocatheters in obstetric patients: A retrospective review of cases over a 12-year period",
abstract = "Background A continuous spinal catheter is a reliable alternative to standard neuraxial techniques in obstetric anesthesia. Despite the potential advantages of intrathecal catheters, they remain underutilized due to fear of infection, nerve damage or post-dural puncture headache. In our tertiary care center, intrathecal catheters are either placed intentionally in high-risk obstetric patients or following inadvertent dural puncture using a 19-gauge macrocatheter passed through a 17-gauge epidural needle. Methods A retrospective review of 761 intrathecal catheters placed from 2001 to 2012 was conducted. An institutional obstetric anesthesia database was used to identify patients with intrathecal catheters. Medical records were reviewed for procedural details and complications. Results There were no serious complications, including meningitis, epidural or spinal abscess, hematoma, arachnoiditis, or cauda equina syndrome, associated with intrathecal catheters. The failure rates were 2.8{\%} (3/108) for intentional placements and 6.1{\%} (40/653) for placements following accidental dural puncture. The incidence of post-dural puncture headache was 41{\%} (312/761) and the epidural blood patch rate was 31{\%} (97/312). Conclusions This review demonstrates that intrathecal catheters are dependable and an option for labor analgesia and surgical anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Serious long-lasting complications are rare.",
keywords = "Continuous spinal catheter, Intrathecal catheter, Labor pain, Obstetric anesthesia",
author = "Jennifer Cohn and Daria Moaveni and J. Sznol and Jayanthie Ranasinghe",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijoa.2015.08.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "30--36",
journal = "International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia",
issn = "0959-289X",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Complications of 761 short-term intrathecal macrocatheters in obstetric patients

T2 - A retrospective review of cases over a 12-year period

AU - Cohn, Jennifer

AU - Moaveni, Daria

AU - Sznol, J.

AU - Ranasinghe, Jayanthie

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Background A continuous spinal catheter is a reliable alternative to standard neuraxial techniques in obstetric anesthesia. Despite the potential advantages of intrathecal catheters, they remain underutilized due to fear of infection, nerve damage or post-dural puncture headache. In our tertiary care center, intrathecal catheters are either placed intentionally in high-risk obstetric patients or following inadvertent dural puncture using a 19-gauge macrocatheter passed through a 17-gauge epidural needle. Methods A retrospective review of 761 intrathecal catheters placed from 2001 to 2012 was conducted. An institutional obstetric anesthesia database was used to identify patients with intrathecal catheters. Medical records were reviewed for procedural details and complications. Results There were no serious complications, including meningitis, epidural or spinal abscess, hematoma, arachnoiditis, or cauda equina syndrome, associated with intrathecal catheters. The failure rates were 2.8% (3/108) for intentional placements and 6.1% (40/653) for placements following accidental dural puncture. The incidence of post-dural puncture headache was 41% (312/761) and the epidural blood patch rate was 31% (97/312). Conclusions This review demonstrates that intrathecal catheters are dependable and an option for labor analgesia and surgical anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Serious long-lasting complications are rare.

AB - Background A continuous spinal catheter is a reliable alternative to standard neuraxial techniques in obstetric anesthesia. Despite the potential advantages of intrathecal catheters, they remain underutilized due to fear of infection, nerve damage or post-dural puncture headache. In our tertiary care center, intrathecal catheters are either placed intentionally in high-risk obstetric patients or following inadvertent dural puncture using a 19-gauge macrocatheter passed through a 17-gauge epidural needle. Methods A retrospective review of 761 intrathecal catheters placed from 2001 to 2012 was conducted. An institutional obstetric anesthesia database was used to identify patients with intrathecal catheters. Medical records were reviewed for procedural details and complications. Results There were no serious complications, including meningitis, epidural or spinal abscess, hematoma, arachnoiditis, or cauda equina syndrome, associated with intrathecal catheters. The failure rates were 2.8% (3/108) for intentional placements and 6.1% (40/653) for placements following accidental dural puncture. The incidence of post-dural puncture headache was 41% (312/761) and the epidural blood patch rate was 31% (97/312). Conclusions This review demonstrates that intrathecal catheters are dependable and an option for labor analgesia and surgical anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Serious long-lasting complications are rare.

KW - Continuous spinal catheter

KW - Intrathecal catheter

KW - Labor pain

KW - Obstetric anesthesia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959441463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959441463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijoa.2015.08.006

DO - 10.1016/j.ijoa.2015.08.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 26421698

AN - SCOPUS:84959441463

VL - 25

SP - 30

EP - 36

JO - International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia

JF - International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia

SN - 0959-289X

ER -