Complications and Outcomes of One-Bone Forearm Reconstruction

So Yeon Kim, Harvey Chim, Allen T. Bishop, Alexander Y. Shin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to review the outcomes of patients who underwent one-bone forearm (OBF) reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent OBF surgery between 1994 and 2014 was undertaken. Patient demographics, etiology, associated injuries, number of surgeries prior to OBF surgery, surgical details, and postoperative information were collected. A telephone interview was conducted at final follow-up, including a Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire, a 10-point scoring system used by Peterson et al, and a series of questions concerning pain and patient satisfaction. Results: There were 6 males and 2 females with a mean age of 44 years (range, 20-66 years). All patients had traumatic etiology, with 6 having open wounds and 2 having closed wounds. All patients had union with a mean follow-up of 83.6 months (range, 16-218 months). The mean pain score was 3 (range, 0-8), of which 3 were painless (score 0). The mean QuickDASH score was 39 (range, 7-75), and 4 patients had good or excellent results according to the 10-point score system used by Peterson et al. All patients were satisfied with the result. Five of 8 had complications related to soft tissues that were residual from their prior injuries and surgeries. One patient had post healing fracture requiring revision fixation and 1 had a postoperative infection requiring parenteral antibiotics. Conclusions: OBF surgery is an effective salvage procedure for complicated forearm instability, particularly after trauma. While union rates are high, complications are typically related to pain and soft tissue secondary to the previous injury and reconstructive procedures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)140-144
Number of pages5
JournalHand
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

Forearm
Bone and Bones
Wounds and Injuries
Arm
Hand
Nociceptive Pain
Pain
Fracture Healing
Patient Satisfaction
Demography
Interviews
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Infection

Keywords

  • complications
  • forearm
  • one-bone forearm
  • outcomes
  • salvage procedure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Kim, S. Y., Chim, H., Bishop, A. T., & Shin, A. Y. (2017). Complications and Outcomes of One-Bone Forearm Reconstruction. Hand, 12(2), 140-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944716643305

Complications and Outcomes of One-Bone Forearm Reconstruction. / Kim, So Yeon; Chim, Harvey; Bishop, Allen T.; Shin, Alexander Y.

In: Hand, Vol. 12, No. 2, 01.03.2017, p. 140-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, SY, Chim, H, Bishop, AT & Shin, AY 2017, 'Complications and Outcomes of One-Bone Forearm Reconstruction', Hand, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 140-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944716643305
Kim, So Yeon ; Chim, Harvey ; Bishop, Allen T. ; Shin, Alexander Y. / Complications and Outcomes of One-Bone Forearm Reconstruction. In: Hand. 2017 ; Vol. 12, No. 2. pp. 140-144.
@article{30c6048ed8dd4d62a13f368cd92e5462,
title = "Complications and Outcomes of One-Bone Forearm Reconstruction",
abstract = "Background: The objective of this study was to review the outcomes of patients who underwent one-bone forearm (OBF) reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent OBF surgery between 1994 and 2014 was undertaken. Patient demographics, etiology, associated injuries, number of surgeries prior to OBF surgery, surgical details, and postoperative information were collected. A telephone interview was conducted at final follow-up, including a Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire, a 10-point scoring system used by Peterson et al, and a series of questions concerning pain and patient satisfaction. Results: There were 6 males and 2 females with a mean age of 44 years (range, 20-66 years). All patients had traumatic etiology, with 6 having open wounds and 2 having closed wounds. All patients had union with a mean follow-up of 83.6 months (range, 16-218 months). The mean pain score was 3 (range, 0-8), of which 3 were painless (score 0). The mean QuickDASH score was 39 (range, 7-75), and 4 patients had good or excellent results according to the 10-point score system used by Peterson et al. All patients were satisfied with the result. Five of 8 had complications related to soft tissues that were residual from their prior injuries and surgeries. One patient had post healing fracture requiring revision fixation and 1 had a postoperative infection requiring parenteral antibiotics. Conclusions: OBF surgery is an effective salvage procedure for complicated forearm instability, particularly after trauma. While union rates are high, complications are typically related to pain and soft tissue secondary to the previous injury and reconstructive procedures.",
keywords = "complications, forearm, one-bone forearm, outcomes, salvage procedure",
author = "Kim, {So Yeon} and Harvey Chim and Bishop, {Allen T.} and Shin, {Alexander Y.}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1558944716643305",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "140--144",
journal = "Journal of Hand Surgery",
issn = "0266-7681",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Complications and Outcomes of One-Bone Forearm Reconstruction

AU - Kim, So Yeon

AU - Chim, Harvey

AU - Bishop, Allen T.

AU - Shin, Alexander Y.

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Background: The objective of this study was to review the outcomes of patients who underwent one-bone forearm (OBF) reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent OBF surgery between 1994 and 2014 was undertaken. Patient demographics, etiology, associated injuries, number of surgeries prior to OBF surgery, surgical details, and postoperative information were collected. A telephone interview was conducted at final follow-up, including a Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire, a 10-point scoring system used by Peterson et al, and a series of questions concerning pain and patient satisfaction. Results: There were 6 males and 2 females with a mean age of 44 years (range, 20-66 years). All patients had traumatic etiology, with 6 having open wounds and 2 having closed wounds. All patients had union with a mean follow-up of 83.6 months (range, 16-218 months). The mean pain score was 3 (range, 0-8), of which 3 were painless (score 0). The mean QuickDASH score was 39 (range, 7-75), and 4 patients had good or excellent results according to the 10-point score system used by Peterson et al. All patients were satisfied with the result. Five of 8 had complications related to soft tissues that were residual from their prior injuries and surgeries. One patient had post healing fracture requiring revision fixation and 1 had a postoperative infection requiring parenteral antibiotics. Conclusions: OBF surgery is an effective salvage procedure for complicated forearm instability, particularly after trauma. While union rates are high, complications are typically related to pain and soft tissue secondary to the previous injury and reconstructive procedures.

AB - Background: The objective of this study was to review the outcomes of patients who underwent one-bone forearm (OBF) reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent OBF surgery between 1994 and 2014 was undertaken. Patient demographics, etiology, associated injuries, number of surgeries prior to OBF surgery, surgical details, and postoperative information were collected. A telephone interview was conducted at final follow-up, including a Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire, a 10-point scoring system used by Peterson et al, and a series of questions concerning pain and patient satisfaction. Results: There were 6 males and 2 females with a mean age of 44 years (range, 20-66 years). All patients had traumatic etiology, with 6 having open wounds and 2 having closed wounds. All patients had union with a mean follow-up of 83.6 months (range, 16-218 months). The mean pain score was 3 (range, 0-8), of which 3 were painless (score 0). The mean QuickDASH score was 39 (range, 7-75), and 4 patients had good or excellent results according to the 10-point score system used by Peterson et al. All patients were satisfied with the result. Five of 8 had complications related to soft tissues that were residual from their prior injuries and surgeries. One patient had post healing fracture requiring revision fixation and 1 had a postoperative infection requiring parenteral antibiotics. Conclusions: OBF surgery is an effective salvage procedure for complicated forearm instability, particularly after trauma. While union rates are high, complications are typically related to pain and soft tissue secondary to the previous injury and reconstructive procedures.

KW - complications

KW - forearm

KW - one-bone forearm

KW - outcomes

KW - salvage procedure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014652223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014652223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1558944716643305

DO - 10.1177/1558944716643305

M3 - Article

C2 - 28344524

AN - SCOPUS:85014652223

VL - 12

SP - 140

EP - 144

JO - Journal of Hand Surgery

JF - Journal of Hand Surgery

SN - 0266-7681

IS - 2

ER -