Complementary features of attention bias modification therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in pediatric anxiety disorders

Lauren K. White, Stefanie Sequeira, Jennifer C Britton, Melissa A. Brotman, Andrea L. Gold, Erin Berman, Kenneth Towbin, Rany Abend, Nathan A. Fox, Yair Bar-Haim, Ellen Leibenluft, Daniel S. Pine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: In the treatment of anxiety disorders, attention bias modification therapy (ABMT) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) may have complementary effects by targeting different aspects of perturbed threat responses and behaviors. ABMT may target rapid, implicit threat reactions, whereas CBT may target slowly deployed threat responses. The authors used amygdala-based connectivity during a threat-attention task and a randomized controlled trial design to evaluate potential complementary features of these treatments in pediatric anxiety disorders. Method: Prior to treatment, youths (8-17 years old) with anxiety disorders (N=54), as well as healthy comparison youths (N=51), performed a threat-attention task during functional MRI acquisition. Task-related amygdala-based functional connectivity was assessed. Patients with and without imaging data (N=85) were then randomly assigned to receive CBT paired with either active or placebo ABMT. Clinical response was evaluated, and pretreatment amygdalabased connectivity profiles were compared among patients with varying levels of clinical response. Results: Compared with theCBT plus placebo ABMTgroup, the CBT plus active ABMT group exhibited less severe anxiety after treatment. The patient and healthy comparison groups differed in amygdala-insula connectivity during the threat-attention task. Patients whose connectivity profiles were most different from those of the healthy comparison group exhibited the poorest response to treatment, particularly those who received CBT plus placebo ABMT. Conclusions: The study provides evidence of enhanced clinical effects for patients receiving active ABMT. Moreover, ABMT appears to be most effective for patients with abnormal amygdala-insula connectivity. ABMTmay target specific threat processes associated with dysfunctional amygdala-insula connectivity that are not targeted by CBT alone. This may explain the observation of enhanced clinical response to CBT plus active ABMT.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)775-784
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Psychiatry
Volume174
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

Fingerprint

Cognitive Therapy
Anxiety Disorders
Pediatrics
Amygdala
Therapeutics
Placebos
Group Psychotherapy
Anxiety
Randomized Controlled Trials
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Observation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Complementary features of attention bias modification therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in pediatric anxiety disorders. / White, Lauren K.; Sequeira, Stefanie; Britton, Jennifer C; Brotman, Melissa A.; Gold, Andrea L.; Berman, Erin; Towbin, Kenneth; Abend, Rany; Fox, Nathan A.; Bar-Haim, Yair; Leibenluft, Ellen; Pine, Daniel S.

In: American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 174, No. 8, 01.08.2017, p. 775-784.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

White, LK, Sequeira, S, Britton, JC, Brotman, MA, Gold, AL, Berman, E, Towbin, K, Abend, R, Fox, NA, Bar-Haim, Y, Leibenluft, E & Pine, DS 2017, 'Complementary features of attention bias modification therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in pediatric anxiety disorders', American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 174, no. 8, pp. 775-784. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16070847
White, Lauren K. ; Sequeira, Stefanie ; Britton, Jennifer C ; Brotman, Melissa A. ; Gold, Andrea L. ; Berman, Erin ; Towbin, Kenneth ; Abend, Rany ; Fox, Nathan A. ; Bar-Haim, Yair ; Leibenluft, Ellen ; Pine, Daniel S. / Complementary features of attention bias modification therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in pediatric anxiety disorders. In: American Journal of Psychiatry. 2017 ; Vol. 174, No. 8. pp. 775-784.
@article{cc4cfb69abb54122a26a91aa76e9b9fb,
title = "Complementary features of attention bias modification therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in pediatric anxiety disorders",
abstract = "Objective: In the treatment of anxiety disorders, attention bias modification therapy (ABMT) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) may have complementary effects by targeting different aspects of perturbed threat responses and behaviors. ABMT may target rapid, implicit threat reactions, whereas CBT may target slowly deployed threat responses. The authors used amygdala-based connectivity during a threat-attention task and a randomized controlled trial design to evaluate potential complementary features of these treatments in pediatric anxiety disorders. Method: Prior to treatment, youths (8-17 years old) with anxiety disorders (N=54), as well as healthy comparison youths (N=51), performed a threat-attention task during functional MRI acquisition. Task-related amygdala-based functional connectivity was assessed. Patients with and without imaging data (N=85) were then randomly assigned to receive CBT paired with either active or placebo ABMT. Clinical response was evaluated, and pretreatment amygdalabased connectivity profiles were compared among patients with varying levels of clinical response. Results: Compared with theCBT plus placebo ABMTgroup, the CBT plus active ABMT group exhibited less severe anxiety after treatment. The patient and healthy comparison groups differed in amygdala-insula connectivity during the threat-attention task. Patients whose connectivity profiles were most different from those of the healthy comparison group exhibited the poorest response to treatment, particularly those who received CBT plus placebo ABMT. Conclusions: The study provides evidence of enhanced clinical effects for patients receiving active ABMT. Moreover, ABMT appears to be most effective for patients with abnormal amygdala-insula connectivity. ABMTmay target specific threat processes associated with dysfunctional amygdala-insula connectivity that are not targeted by CBT alone. This may explain the observation of enhanced clinical response to CBT plus active ABMT.",
author = "White, {Lauren K.} and Stefanie Sequeira and Britton, {Jennifer C} and Brotman, {Melissa A.} and Gold, {Andrea L.} and Erin Berman and Kenneth Towbin and Rany Abend and Fox, {Nathan A.} and Yair Bar-Haim and Ellen Leibenluft and Pine, {Daniel S.}",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16070847",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "174",
pages = "775--784",
journal = "American Journal of Psychiatry",
issn = "0002-953X",
publisher = "American Psychiatric Association",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Complementary features of attention bias modification therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in pediatric anxiety disorders

AU - White, Lauren K.

AU - Sequeira, Stefanie

AU - Britton, Jennifer C

AU - Brotman, Melissa A.

AU - Gold, Andrea L.

AU - Berman, Erin

AU - Towbin, Kenneth

AU - Abend, Rany

AU - Fox, Nathan A.

AU - Bar-Haim, Yair

AU - Leibenluft, Ellen

AU - Pine, Daniel S.

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Objective: In the treatment of anxiety disorders, attention bias modification therapy (ABMT) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) may have complementary effects by targeting different aspects of perturbed threat responses and behaviors. ABMT may target rapid, implicit threat reactions, whereas CBT may target slowly deployed threat responses. The authors used amygdala-based connectivity during a threat-attention task and a randomized controlled trial design to evaluate potential complementary features of these treatments in pediatric anxiety disorders. Method: Prior to treatment, youths (8-17 years old) with anxiety disorders (N=54), as well as healthy comparison youths (N=51), performed a threat-attention task during functional MRI acquisition. Task-related amygdala-based functional connectivity was assessed. Patients with and without imaging data (N=85) were then randomly assigned to receive CBT paired with either active or placebo ABMT. Clinical response was evaluated, and pretreatment amygdalabased connectivity profiles were compared among patients with varying levels of clinical response. Results: Compared with theCBT plus placebo ABMTgroup, the CBT plus active ABMT group exhibited less severe anxiety after treatment. The patient and healthy comparison groups differed in amygdala-insula connectivity during the threat-attention task. Patients whose connectivity profiles were most different from those of the healthy comparison group exhibited the poorest response to treatment, particularly those who received CBT plus placebo ABMT. Conclusions: The study provides evidence of enhanced clinical effects for patients receiving active ABMT. Moreover, ABMT appears to be most effective for patients with abnormal amygdala-insula connectivity. ABMTmay target specific threat processes associated with dysfunctional amygdala-insula connectivity that are not targeted by CBT alone. This may explain the observation of enhanced clinical response to CBT plus active ABMT.

AB - Objective: In the treatment of anxiety disorders, attention bias modification therapy (ABMT) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) may have complementary effects by targeting different aspects of perturbed threat responses and behaviors. ABMT may target rapid, implicit threat reactions, whereas CBT may target slowly deployed threat responses. The authors used amygdala-based connectivity during a threat-attention task and a randomized controlled trial design to evaluate potential complementary features of these treatments in pediatric anxiety disorders. Method: Prior to treatment, youths (8-17 years old) with anxiety disorders (N=54), as well as healthy comparison youths (N=51), performed a threat-attention task during functional MRI acquisition. Task-related amygdala-based functional connectivity was assessed. Patients with and without imaging data (N=85) were then randomly assigned to receive CBT paired with either active or placebo ABMT. Clinical response was evaluated, and pretreatment amygdalabased connectivity profiles were compared among patients with varying levels of clinical response. Results: Compared with theCBT plus placebo ABMTgroup, the CBT plus active ABMT group exhibited less severe anxiety after treatment. The patient and healthy comparison groups differed in amygdala-insula connectivity during the threat-attention task. Patients whose connectivity profiles were most different from those of the healthy comparison group exhibited the poorest response to treatment, particularly those who received CBT plus placebo ABMT. Conclusions: The study provides evidence of enhanced clinical effects for patients receiving active ABMT. Moreover, ABMT appears to be most effective for patients with abnormal amygdala-insula connectivity. ABMTmay target specific threat processes associated with dysfunctional amygdala-insula connectivity that are not targeted by CBT alone. This may explain the observation of enhanced clinical response to CBT plus active ABMT.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026764241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026764241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16070847

DO - 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16070847

M3 - Article

C2 - 28407726

AN - SCOPUS:85026764241

VL - 174

SP - 775

EP - 784

JO - American Journal of Psychiatry

JF - American Journal of Psychiatry

SN - 0002-953X

IS - 8

ER -