Comparisons of multiple automated anatomy-based image-guidance methods for patient setup before head/neck external beam radiotherapy

Nesrin Dogan, Shiyu Song, Habeeb Saleh, Jian Wu, Martin J. Murphy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose was to assess the variability in automated translational head/neck setup corrections computed from several different imaging modalities and rigid registration methods using patient anatomy. Shifts were calculated using three commercial and one in-house automated rigid registration methods for nine head/neck patients who were imaged with three different image-guidance systems. The mean difference between the daily isocenter shifts determined by the four methods ranged from 2.8 to 12.5 mm for all of the test cases. These differences are much greater than the variability observed for a rigid imaging phantom. Image-guided setup procedures have an uncertainty that depends on the imaging modality, the registration algorithm, the image resolution and the image content. In the absence of an absolute ground truth, the variation in the shifts calculated by several different methods provides a useful estimate of that uncertainty.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)76-85
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Volume12
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

anatomy
Radiotherapy
radiation therapy
Anatomy
Neck
Head
Imaging techniques
shift
ground truth
image resolution
Uncertainty
Image resolution
Imaging Phantoms
estimates

Keywords

  • Head/neck radiotherapy
  • Image registration
  • Image-guided setup
  • Registration error
  • Setup uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiation
  • Instrumentation

Cite this

Comparisons of multiple automated anatomy-based image-guidance methods for patient setup before head/neck external beam radiotherapy. / Dogan, Nesrin; Song, Shiyu; Saleh, Habeeb; Wu, Jian; Murphy, Martin J.

In: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2011, p. 76-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{245a8faa5e8d4365b7e75e8162f1f268,
title = "Comparisons of multiple automated anatomy-based image-guidance methods for patient setup before head/neck external beam radiotherapy",
abstract = "The purpose was to assess the variability in automated translational head/neck setup corrections computed from several different imaging modalities and rigid registration methods using patient anatomy. Shifts were calculated using three commercial and one in-house automated rigid registration methods for nine head/neck patients who were imaged with three different image-guidance systems. The mean difference between the daily isocenter shifts determined by the four methods ranged from 2.8 to 12.5 mm for all of the test cases. These differences are much greater than the variability observed for a rigid imaging phantom. Image-guided setup procedures have an uncertainty that depends on the imaging modality, the registration algorithm, the image resolution and the image content. In the absence of an absolute ground truth, the variation in the shifts calculated by several different methods provides a useful estimate of that uncertainty.",
keywords = "Head/neck radiotherapy, Image registration, Image-guided setup, Registration error, Setup uncertainty",
author = "Nesrin Dogan and Shiyu Song and Habeeb Saleh and Jian Wu and Murphy, {Martin J.}",
year = "2011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "76--85",
journal = "Journal of applied clinical medical physics / American College of Medical Physics",
issn = "1526-9914",
publisher = "American Institute of Physics Publising LLC",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparisons of multiple automated anatomy-based image-guidance methods for patient setup before head/neck external beam radiotherapy

AU - Dogan, Nesrin

AU - Song, Shiyu

AU - Saleh, Habeeb

AU - Wu, Jian

AU - Murphy, Martin J.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The purpose was to assess the variability in automated translational head/neck setup corrections computed from several different imaging modalities and rigid registration methods using patient anatomy. Shifts were calculated using three commercial and one in-house automated rigid registration methods for nine head/neck patients who were imaged with three different image-guidance systems. The mean difference between the daily isocenter shifts determined by the four methods ranged from 2.8 to 12.5 mm for all of the test cases. These differences are much greater than the variability observed for a rigid imaging phantom. Image-guided setup procedures have an uncertainty that depends on the imaging modality, the registration algorithm, the image resolution and the image content. In the absence of an absolute ground truth, the variation in the shifts calculated by several different methods provides a useful estimate of that uncertainty.

AB - The purpose was to assess the variability in automated translational head/neck setup corrections computed from several different imaging modalities and rigid registration methods using patient anatomy. Shifts were calculated using three commercial and one in-house automated rigid registration methods for nine head/neck patients who were imaged with three different image-guidance systems. The mean difference between the daily isocenter shifts determined by the four methods ranged from 2.8 to 12.5 mm for all of the test cases. These differences are much greater than the variability observed for a rigid imaging phantom. Image-guided setup procedures have an uncertainty that depends on the imaging modality, the registration algorithm, the image resolution and the image content. In the absence of an absolute ground truth, the variation in the shifts calculated by several different methods provides a useful estimate of that uncertainty.

KW - Head/neck radiotherapy

KW - Image registration

KW - Image-guided setup

KW - Registration error

KW - Setup uncertainty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951697851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79951697851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 76

EP - 85

JO - Journal of applied clinical medical physics / American College of Medical Physics

JF - Journal of applied clinical medical physics / American College of Medical Physics

SN - 1526-9914

IS - 1

ER -