Comparison of the auditory-evoked brainstem response wave i to distortion-product otoacoustic emissions resulting from changes to inner ear blood flow

Fred F. Telischi, Thierry Mom, Mark Agrama, Barden B. Stagner, Ozcan Ozdamar, Andres Bustillo, Glen K. Martin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective/Hypothesis: Examine and compare in detail the time courses of the auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave I amplitude and latency to the distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) amplitude and phase measured in the rabbit model following deliberate obstruction of cochlear blood flow (CBF). Methods: Using a posterior fossa craniotomy in five rabbits, the internal auditory artery (IAA) was compressed with a probe. ABR and otoacoustic emission were continuously monitored before, during, and after the compressions. Results: ABR wave I amplitudes demonstrated measurable decreases at a mean of 28.3 s after IAA compression, whereas DPOAE amplitudes decreased after a mean of 14.8 s. Wave I latencies began to increase at a mean of 18.3 s after occlusion, while DPOAE phase measures changed after a mean of only 4.8 s following IAA compression. The time-course patterns were similar for the amplitudes of both ABR wave I and DPOAE. Conclusions: ABR wave I amplitude follows a similar, though delayed (by approximately 10 s) time-course pattern to that of the DPOAE following IAA compression. The implication of these findings for intraoperative auditory monitoring is that changes in many currently employed measures will lag actual surgically induced alterations in CBF by at least 20 to 30 s.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)186-191
Number of pages6
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume109
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1999

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of the auditory-evoked brainstem response wave i to distortion-product otoacoustic emissions resulting from changes to inner ear blood flow'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this