Comparison of sonicated albumin enhanced sonography to fluoroscopic and radionuclide voiding cystography for detecting vesicoureteral reflux

Anthony Atala, Pamela Ellsworth, Jane Share, Harriet Paltiel, R. Dixon Walker, Alan B. Retik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We compared sonicated albumin enhanced sonography to fluoroscopic and radionuclide voiding cystography for detecting vesicoureteral reflux. Materials and Methods: After obtaining informed consent we enrolled in our study 20 patients with known or suspected vesicoureteral reflux and no contraindications to intravesical sonicated albumin. All patients underwent albumin enhanced sonography, following which 10 patients each underwent radionuclide and fluoroscopic voiding cystography. Reflux was graded by the observing radiologist and urologist. Results: In 10 patients albumin enhanced sonography demonstrated reflux in 6 of the 7 (83%) ureters in which radionuclide cystography identified reflux. In 2 patients ultrasound studies were inadequate due to excessive movement during the procedure, and the patients were classified as unevaluable. In the remaining 10 patients 12 of 20 ureters (60%) were equal in the absence or presence of and degree of reflux on enhanced sonography and voiding cystourethrography. In 6 ureters voiding cystourethrography detected reflux more readily or revealed a higher grade of reflux. Two ureters had a higher reflux grade on enhanced sonography. No adverse effects were associated with intravesical sonicated albumin. Conclusions: In experienced hands sonicated albumin enhanced sonography is safe for evaluating vesicoureteral reflux. It provides the simultaneous evaluation of renal contours, parenchyma and size in addition to bladder visualization. This new technique may prove to be useful as a followup study in patients with previously documented reflux or as a primary study for sibling screening.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1820-1822
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume160
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Vesico-Ureteral Reflux
Radioisotopes
Albumins
Ultrasonography
Ureter
Cystography
Informed Consent
Siblings
Urinary Bladder
Kidney

Keywords

  • Bladder
  • Ultrasonography
  • Ureter
  • Vesico-ureteral reflux

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Comparison of sonicated albumin enhanced sonography to fluoroscopic and radionuclide voiding cystography for detecting vesicoureteral reflux. / Atala, Anthony; Ellsworth, Pamela; Share, Jane; Paltiel, Harriet; Walker, R. Dixon; Retik, Alan B.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 160, No. 5, 01.11.1998, p. 1820-1822.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Atala, Anthony ; Ellsworth, Pamela ; Share, Jane ; Paltiel, Harriet ; Walker, R. Dixon ; Retik, Alan B. / Comparison of sonicated albumin enhanced sonography to fluoroscopic and radionuclide voiding cystography for detecting vesicoureteral reflux. In: Journal of Urology. 1998 ; Vol. 160, No. 5. pp. 1820-1822.
@article{d9bd7658827b45acbf701f5b7908afe0,
title = "Comparison of sonicated albumin enhanced sonography to fluoroscopic and radionuclide voiding cystography for detecting vesicoureteral reflux",
abstract = "Purpose: We compared sonicated albumin enhanced sonography to fluoroscopic and radionuclide voiding cystography for detecting vesicoureteral reflux. Materials and Methods: After obtaining informed consent we enrolled in our study 20 patients with known or suspected vesicoureteral reflux and no contraindications to intravesical sonicated albumin. All patients underwent albumin enhanced sonography, following which 10 patients each underwent radionuclide and fluoroscopic voiding cystography. Reflux was graded by the observing radiologist and urologist. Results: In 10 patients albumin enhanced sonography demonstrated reflux in 6 of the 7 (83{\%}) ureters in which radionuclide cystography identified reflux. In 2 patients ultrasound studies were inadequate due to excessive movement during the procedure, and the patients were classified as unevaluable. In the remaining 10 patients 12 of 20 ureters (60{\%}) were equal in the absence or presence of and degree of reflux on enhanced sonography and voiding cystourethrography. In 6 ureters voiding cystourethrography detected reflux more readily or revealed a higher grade of reflux. Two ureters had a higher reflux grade on enhanced sonography. No adverse effects were associated with intravesical sonicated albumin. Conclusions: In experienced hands sonicated albumin enhanced sonography is safe for evaluating vesicoureteral reflux. It provides the simultaneous evaluation of renal contours, parenchyma and size in addition to bladder visualization. This new technique may prove to be useful as a followup study in patients with previously documented reflux or as a primary study for sibling screening.",
keywords = "Bladder, Ultrasonography, Ureter, Vesico-ureteral reflux",
author = "Anthony Atala and Pamela Ellsworth and Jane Share and Harriet Paltiel and Walker, {R. Dixon} and Retik, {Alan B.}",
year = "1998",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62424-8",
language = "English",
volume = "160",
pages = "1820--1822",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of sonicated albumin enhanced sonography to fluoroscopic and radionuclide voiding cystography for detecting vesicoureteral reflux

AU - Atala, Anthony

AU - Ellsworth, Pamela

AU - Share, Jane

AU - Paltiel, Harriet

AU - Walker, R. Dixon

AU - Retik, Alan B.

PY - 1998/11/1

Y1 - 1998/11/1

N2 - Purpose: We compared sonicated albumin enhanced sonography to fluoroscopic and radionuclide voiding cystography for detecting vesicoureteral reflux. Materials and Methods: After obtaining informed consent we enrolled in our study 20 patients with known or suspected vesicoureteral reflux and no contraindications to intravesical sonicated albumin. All patients underwent albumin enhanced sonography, following which 10 patients each underwent radionuclide and fluoroscopic voiding cystography. Reflux was graded by the observing radiologist and urologist. Results: In 10 patients albumin enhanced sonography demonstrated reflux in 6 of the 7 (83%) ureters in which radionuclide cystography identified reflux. In 2 patients ultrasound studies were inadequate due to excessive movement during the procedure, and the patients were classified as unevaluable. In the remaining 10 patients 12 of 20 ureters (60%) were equal in the absence or presence of and degree of reflux on enhanced sonography and voiding cystourethrography. In 6 ureters voiding cystourethrography detected reflux more readily or revealed a higher grade of reflux. Two ureters had a higher reflux grade on enhanced sonography. No adverse effects were associated with intravesical sonicated albumin. Conclusions: In experienced hands sonicated albumin enhanced sonography is safe for evaluating vesicoureteral reflux. It provides the simultaneous evaluation of renal contours, parenchyma and size in addition to bladder visualization. This new technique may prove to be useful as a followup study in patients with previously documented reflux or as a primary study for sibling screening.

AB - Purpose: We compared sonicated albumin enhanced sonography to fluoroscopic and radionuclide voiding cystography for detecting vesicoureteral reflux. Materials and Methods: After obtaining informed consent we enrolled in our study 20 patients with known or suspected vesicoureteral reflux and no contraindications to intravesical sonicated albumin. All patients underwent albumin enhanced sonography, following which 10 patients each underwent radionuclide and fluoroscopic voiding cystography. Reflux was graded by the observing radiologist and urologist. Results: In 10 patients albumin enhanced sonography demonstrated reflux in 6 of the 7 (83%) ureters in which radionuclide cystography identified reflux. In 2 patients ultrasound studies were inadequate due to excessive movement during the procedure, and the patients were classified as unevaluable. In the remaining 10 patients 12 of 20 ureters (60%) were equal in the absence or presence of and degree of reflux on enhanced sonography and voiding cystourethrography. In 6 ureters voiding cystourethrography detected reflux more readily or revealed a higher grade of reflux. Two ureters had a higher reflux grade on enhanced sonography. No adverse effects were associated with intravesical sonicated albumin. Conclusions: In experienced hands sonicated albumin enhanced sonography is safe for evaluating vesicoureteral reflux. It provides the simultaneous evaluation of renal contours, parenchyma and size in addition to bladder visualization. This new technique may prove to be useful as a followup study in patients with previously documented reflux or as a primary study for sibling screening.

KW - Bladder

KW - Ultrasonography

KW - Ureter

KW - Vesico-ureteral reflux

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0344980156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0344980156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62424-8

DO - 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62424-8

M3 - Article

VL - 160

SP - 1820

EP - 1822

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 5

ER -