Comparison of performance on memory-guided saccade and delayed spatial match-to-sample tasks in monkeys

Ioan Opris, Andrei Barborica, Vincent P. Ferrera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To investigate the sources of spatial error in memory-guided saccades (MGS), we have trained monkeys on two different tasks: a MGS task and a delayed spatial match-to-sample (MTS) task. We first tested the effect of introducing a post-saccadic visual feedback on the accuracy of MGS. We found that visual feedback had a pronounced effect on the systematic saccade error, but less of an effect on the variable error. Visual feedback can improve the accuracy of saccadic eye movements over several days, while feedback removal can decrease accuracy in a reversible way. These effects also depend both on target eccentricity and the duration of the memory delay. To test whether saccade error is due to the accuracy of spatial memory storage or arises downstream from that memory, we measured behavioral performance on a spatial MTS task both before and after training with visual feedback. The results showed no significant difference in performance of the MTS task before and after feedback training despite significant changes in MGS accuracy. The results suggest that the accuracy of spatial memory is not the source of the systematic errors that accompany MGS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)321-332
Number of pages12
JournalVision Research
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Saccades
Haplorhini
Sensory Feedback
Research Design

Keywords

  • Feedback
  • Monkey
  • Saccade
  • Spatial working memory
  • Systematic error
  • Variable error

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Comparison of performance on memory-guided saccade and delayed spatial match-to-sample tasks in monkeys. / Opris, Ioan; Barborica, Andrei; Ferrera, Vincent P.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 43, No. 3, 01.02.2003, p. 321-332.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Opris, Ioan ; Barborica, Andrei ; Ferrera, Vincent P. / Comparison of performance on memory-guided saccade and delayed spatial match-to-sample tasks in monkeys. In: Vision Research. 2003 ; Vol. 43, No. 3. pp. 321-332.
@article{4931a26af752423a991f21464c03dc0e,
title = "Comparison of performance on memory-guided saccade and delayed spatial match-to-sample tasks in monkeys",
abstract = "To investigate the sources of spatial error in memory-guided saccades (MGS), we have trained monkeys on two different tasks: a MGS task and a delayed spatial match-to-sample (MTS) task. We first tested the effect of introducing a post-saccadic visual feedback on the accuracy of MGS. We found that visual feedback had a pronounced effect on the systematic saccade error, but less of an effect on the variable error. Visual feedback can improve the accuracy of saccadic eye movements over several days, while feedback removal can decrease accuracy in a reversible way. These effects also depend both on target eccentricity and the duration of the memory delay. To test whether saccade error is due to the accuracy of spatial memory storage or arises downstream from that memory, we measured behavioral performance on a spatial MTS task both before and after training with visual feedback. The results showed no significant difference in performance of the MTS task before and after feedback training despite significant changes in MGS accuracy. The results suggest that the accuracy of spatial memory is not the source of the systematic errors that accompany MGS.",
keywords = "Feedback, Monkey, Saccade, Spatial working memory, Systematic error, Variable error",
author = "Ioan Opris and Andrei Barborica and Ferrera, {Vincent P.}",
year = "2003",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00418-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "321--332",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of performance on memory-guided saccade and delayed spatial match-to-sample tasks in monkeys

AU - Opris, Ioan

AU - Barborica, Andrei

AU - Ferrera, Vincent P.

PY - 2003/2/1

Y1 - 2003/2/1

N2 - To investigate the sources of spatial error in memory-guided saccades (MGS), we have trained monkeys on two different tasks: a MGS task and a delayed spatial match-to-sample (MTS) task. We first tested the effect of introducing a post-saccadic visual feedback on the accuracy of MGS. We found that visual feedback had a pronounced effect on the systematic saccade error, but less of an effect on the variable error. Visual feedback can improve the accuracy of saccadic eye movements over several days, while feedback removal can decrease accuracy in a reversible way. These effects also depend both on target eccentricity and the duration of the memory delay. To test whether saccade error is due to the accuracy of spatial memory storage or arises downstream from that memory, we measured behavioral performance on a spatial MTS task both before and after training with visual feedback. The results showed no significant difference in performance of the MTS task before and after feedback training despite significant changes in MGS accuracy. The results suggest that the accuracy of spatial memory is not the source of the systematic errors that accompany MGS.

AB - To investigate the sources of spatial error in memory-guided saccades (MGS), we have trained monkeys on two different tasks: a MGS task and a delayed spatial match-to-sample (MTS) task. We first tested the effect of introducing a post-saccadic visual feedback on the accuracy of MGS. We found that visual feedback had a pronounced effect on the systematic saccade error, but less of an effect on the variable error. Visual feedback can improve the accuracy of saccadic eye movements over several days, while feedback removal can decrease accuracy in a reversible way. These effects also depend both on target eccentricity and the duration of the memory delay. To test whether saccade error is due to the accuracy of spatial memory storage or arises downstream from that memory, we measured behavioral performance on a spatial MTS task both before and after training with visual feedback. The results showed no significant difference in performance of the MTS task before and after feedback training despite significant changes in MGS accuracy. The results suggest that the accuracy of spatial memory is not the source of the systematic errors that accompany MGS.

KW - Feedback

KW - Monkey

KW - Saccade

KW - Spatial working memory

KW - Systematic error

KW - Variable error

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037300331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037300331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00418-2

DO - 10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00418-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 12535990

AN - SCOPUS:0037300331

VL - 43

SP - 321

EP - 332

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 3

ER -