Comparison of high order schemes for large eddy simulation of circular cylinder flow

Yiqing Shen, GeCheng Zha

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper compares LES results of a cylinder flow with two sets of numerical schcmes, two span lengths, and a coarse and refined mesh. One set of the numerical scheme is the 7th order WENO scheme for the inviscid fluxes and 6th order central differencing for the viscous terms (7-6), the other set is a 5th order WENO scheme with a 4th order central differencing(5-4). For this purpose, a fully conservative 6th-order central differencing for the viscous terms of compressible flows is developed. The new central differencing scheme uses the same stencil of the WENO scheme. No explicit subgrid scale models are used for the LES. The span length has a significant effect on the solution. The 5-4 scheme agrees better with the experiment with the span length of ID and coarse mesh, whereas the 7-6 scheme performs better at the refined mesh with the span length of πD. However, both schemes have poorer results with the span length of πD.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition
StatePublished - Dec 1 2009
Event47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition - Orlando, FL, United States
Duration: Jan 5 2009Jan 8 2009

Other

Other47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition
CountryUnited States
CityOrlando, FL
Period1/5/091/8/09

Fingerprint

compressible flow
Compressible flow
large eddy simulation
Large eddy simulation
circular cylinders
Circular cylinders
Fluxes
mesh
experiment
Experiments
scale models
effect
comparison

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Space and Planetary Science
  • Aerospace Engineering

Cite this

Shen, Y., & Zha, G. (2009). Comparison of high order schemes for large eddy simulation of circular cylinder flow. In 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition [2009-0945]

Comparison of high order schemes for large eddy simulation of circular cylinder flow. / Shen, Yiqing; Zha, GeCheng.

47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. 2009. 2009-0945.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Shen, Y & Zha, G 2009, Comparison of high order schemes for large eddy simulation of circular cylinder flow. in 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition., 2009-0945, 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, FL, United States, 1/5/09.
Shen Y, Zha G. Comparison of high order schemes for large eddy simulation of circular cylinder flow. In 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. 2009. 2009-0945
Shen, Yiqing ; Zha, GeCheng. / Comparison of high order schemes for large eddy simulation of circular cylinder flow. 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. 2009.
@inproceedings{5bf07e76d68647f2b51e346f8c6d4417,
title = "Comparison of high order schemes for large eddy simulation of circular cylinder flow",
abstract = "This paper compares LES results of a cylinder flow with two sets of numerical schcmes, two span lengths, and a coarse and refined mesh. One set of the numerical scheme is the 7th order WENO scheme for the inviscid fluxes and 6th order central differencing for the viscous terms (7-6), the other set is a 5th order WENO scheme with a 4th order central differencing(5-4). For this purpose, a fully conservative 6th-order central differencing for the viscous terms of compressible flows is developed. The new central differencing scheme uses the same stencil of the WENO scheme. No explicit subgrid scale models are used for the LES. The span length has a significant effect on the solution. The 5-4 scheme agrees better with the experiment with the span length of ID and coarse mesh, whereas the 7-6 scheme performs better at the refined mesh with the span length of πD. However, both schemes have poorer results with the span length of πD.",
author = "Yiqing Shen and GeCheng Zha",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781563479694",
booktitle = "47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison of high order schemes for large eddy simulation of circular cylinder flow

AU - Shen, Yiqing

AU - Zha, GeCheng

PY - 2009/12/1

Y1 - 2009/12/1

N2 - This paper compares LES results of a cylinder flow with two sets of numerical schcmes, two span lengths, and a coarse and refined mesh. One set of the numerical scheme is the 7th order WENO scheme for the inviscid fluxes and 6th order central differencing for the viscous terms (7-6), the other set is a 5th order WENO scheme with a 4th order central differencing(5-4). For this purpose, a fully conservative 6th-order central differencing for the viscous terms of compressible flows is developed. The new central differencing scheme uses the same stencil of the WENO scheme. No explicit subgrid scale models are used for the LES. The span length has a significant effect on the solution. The 5-4 scheme agrees better with the experiment with the span length of ID and coarse mesh, whereas the 7-6 scheme performs better at the refined mesh with the span length of πD. However, both schemes have poorer results with the span length of πD.

AB - This paper compares LES results of a cylinder flow with two sets of numerical schcmes, two span lengths, and a coarse and refined mesh. One set of the numerical scheme is the 7th order WENO scheme for the inviscid fluxes and 6th order central differencing for the viscous terms (7-6), the other set is a 5th order WENO scheme with a 4th order central differencing(5-4). For this purpose, a fully conservative 6th-order central differencing for the viscous terms of compressible flows is developed. The new central differencing scheme uses the same stencil of the WENO scheme. No explicit subgrid scale models are used for the LES. The span length has a significant effect on the solution. The 5-4 scheme agrees better with the experiment with the span length of ID and coarse mesh, whereas the 7-6 scheme performs better at the refined mesh with the span length of πD. However, both schemes have poorer results with the span length of πD.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78549275485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78549275485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:78549275485

SN - 9781563479694

BT - 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition

ER -