Comparison of general anesthesia and intravenous sedation-analgesia for SWL

Jason Zommick, Raymond Leveillee, August Zabbo, Lawrence Colasanto, Deborah Barrette

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

We compared general anesthesia and intravenous sedation-analgesia for SWL on a Dornier HM3 lithotripter with respect to treatment and anesthesia time, X-ray exposure, shockwaves administered, and efficacy. The case records of 49 patients receiving general anesthesia and 118 patients who underwent intravenous sedation-analgesia were examined. Follow-up plain abdominal radiographs were evaluated for residual stones. Treatments accomplished under intravenous sedation-analgesia required less anesthesia time and less SWL time, The amount of fluoroscopy time was increased. The success rate in treating patients with these two types of anesthesia was not significantly different. Intravenous sedation-analgesia is safe and effective for shockwave lithotripsy in the HM3 lithotripter. This technique facilitates more rapid outpatient treatment and has excellent patient tolerance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)489-491
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of endourology
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1996

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of general anesthesia and intravenous sedation-analgesia for SWL'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Zommick, J., Leveillee, R., Zabbo, A., Colasanto, L., & Barrette, D. (1996). Comparison of general anesthesia and intravenous sedation-analgesia for SWL. Journal of endourology, 10(6), 489-491. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.1996.10.489