Comparison of four different categories of prosthetic feet during ramp ambulation in unilateral transtibial amputees

Vibhor R Agrawal, Robert Gailey, Ignacio Gaunaurd, Christopher O'Toole, Adam Finnieston, Ronald Tolchin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Comparative effectiveness of prosthetic feet during ramp ambulation in unilateral transtibial amputees, who function at different Medicare Functional Classification Levels, has not been published. Objective: To determine differences in symmetry in external work between four categories of prosthetic feet in K-Level-2 and K-Level-3 unilateral transtibial amputees during ramp ascent and descent. Study design: Randomized repeated-measures trial. Methods: Ten subjects completed six testing sessions during which symmetry in external work was calculated using F-scan in-sole sensors. Between testing sessions 1 and 2, subjects received standardized functional prosthetic training. In Sessions 3-6, subjects tested four feet - solid ankle cushion heel, stationary attachment flexible endoskeleton, Talux (categories K1, K2, and K3, respectively), and Proprio-Foot (microprocessor ankle) - using a study socket and had a 10- to 14-day accommodation period with each foot. Results: During ramp descent, K-Level-2 subjects demonstrated higher symmetry in external work values with Talux and Proprio-Foot compared to the solid ankle cushion heel foot. K-Level-3 subjects also had higher symmetry in external work values with the Talux foot than the solid ankle cushion heel foot. Ramp ascent symmetry in external work values were not significantly different between feet. Conclusions: Prosthetic foot category appears to influence symmetry in external work more during decline walking than incline walking. K-Level-2 unilateral transtibial amputees achieve greater symmetry from K3 dynamic response prosthetic feet with J-shaped ankle and microprocessor ankles while descending ramps. Clinical relevance The findings suggest that K-Level-2 unilateral transtibial amputees benefit from K3 dynamic response prosthetic feet with J-shaped ankle. These results support the prescription of K3 feet for K-Level-2 amputees who frequently negotiate ramps.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)380-389
Number of pages10
JournalProsthetics and Orthotics International
Volume39
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

Amputees
Architectural Accessibility
Walking
Foot
Ankle
Heel
Microcomputers
Medicare
Prescriptions

Keywords

  • biomechanics
  • Biomechanics of prosthetic/orthotic devices
  • gait
  • gait analysis
  • physiotherapy
  • prosthetic feet
  • prosthetics
  • rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Comparison of four different categories of prosthetic feet during ramp ambulation in unilateral transtibial amputees. / Agrawal, Vibhor R; Gailey, Robert; Gaunaurd, Ignacio; O'Toole, Christopher; Finnieston, Adam; Tolchin, Ronald.

In: Prosthetics and Orthotics International, Vol. 39, No. 5, 01.10.2015, p. 380-389.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Agrawal, Vibhor R ; Gailey, Robert ; Gaunaurd, Ignacio ; O'Toole, Christopher ; Finnieston, Adam ; Tolchin, Ronald. / Comparison of four different categories of prosthetic feet during ramp ambulation in unilateral transtibial amputees. In: Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 2015 ; Vol. 39, No. 5. pp. 380-389.
@article{ba6791406d0c4556a1b9e7fb266b66a8,
title = "Comparison of four different categories of prosthetic feet during ramp ambulation in unilateral transtibial amputees",
abstract = "Background: Comparative effectiveness of prosthetic feet during ramp ambulation in unilateral transtibial amputees, who function at different Medicare Functional Classification Levels, has not been published. Objective: To determine differences in symmetry in external work between four categories of prosthetic feet in K-Level-2 and K-Level-3 unilateral transtibial amputees during ramp ascent and descent. Study design: Randomized repeated-measures trial. Methods: Ten subjects completed six testing sessions during which symmetry in external work was calculated using F-scan in-sole sensors. Between testing sessions 1 and 2, subjects received standardized functional prosthetic training. In Sessions 3-6, subjects tested four feet - solid ankle cushion heel, stationary attachment flexible endoskeleton, Talux (categories K1, K2, and K3, respectively), and Proprio-Foot (microprocessor ankle) - using a study socket and had a 10- to 14-day accommodation period with each foot. Results: During ramp descent, K-Level-2 subjects demonstrated higher symmetry in external work values with Talux and Proprio-Foot compared to the solid ankle cushion heel foot. K-Level-3 subjects also had higher symmetry in external work values with the Talux foot than the solid ankle cushion heel foot. Ramp ascent symmetry in external work values were not significantly different between feet. Conclusions: Prosthetic foot category appears to influence symmetry in external work more during decline walking than incline walking. K-Level-2 unilateral transtibial amputees achieve greater symmetry from K3 dynamic response prosthetic feet with J-shaped ankle and microprocessor ankles while descending ramps. Clinical relevance The findings suggest that K-Level-2 unilateral transtibial amputees benefit from K3 dynamic response prosthetic feet with J-shaped ankle. These results support the prescription of K3 feet for K-Level-2 amputees who frequently negotiate ramps.",
keywords = "biomechanics, Biomechanics of prosthetic/orthotic devices, gait, gait analysis, physiotherapy, prosthetic feet, prosthetics, rehabilitation",
author = "Agrawal, {Vibhor R} and Robert Gailey and Ignacio Gaunaurd and Christopher O'Toole and Adam Finnieston and Ronald Tolchin",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0309364614536762",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "380--389",
journal = "Prosthetics and Orthotics International",
issn = "0309-3646",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of four different categories of prosthetic feet during ramp ambulation in unilateral transtibial amputees

AU - Agrawal, Vibhor R

AU - Gailey, Robert

AU - Gaunaurd, Ignacio

AU - O'Toole, Christopher

AU - Finnieston, Adam

AU - Tolchin, Ronald

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - Background: Comparative effectiveness of prosthetic feet during ramp ambulation in unilateral transtibial amputees, who function at different Medicare Functional Classification Levels, has not been published. Objective: To determine differences in symmetry in external work between four categories of prosthetic feet in K-Level-2 and K-Level-3 unilateral transtibial amputees during ramp ascent and descent. Study design: Randomized repeated-measures trial. Methods: Ten subjects completed six testing sessions during which symmetry in external work was calculated using F-scan in-sole sensors. Between testing sessions 1 and 2, subjects received standardized functional prosthetic training. In Sessions 3-6, subjects tested four feet - solid ankle cushion heel, stationary attachment flexible endoskeleton, Talux (categories K1, K2, and K3, respectively), and Proprio-Foot (microprocessor ankle) - using a study socket and had a 10- to 14-day accommodation period with each foot. Results: During ramp descent, K-Level-2 subjects demonstrated higher symmetry in external work values with Talux and Proprio-Foot compared to the solid ankle cushion heel foot. K-Level-3 subjects also had higher symmetry in external work values with the Talux foot than the solid ankle cushion heel foot. Ramp ascent symmetry in external work values were not significantly different between feet. Conclusions: Prosthetic foot category appears to influence symmetry in external work more during decline walking than incline walking. K-Level-2 unilateral transtibial amputees achieve greater symmetry from K3 dynamic response prosthetic feet with J-shaped ankle and microprocessor ankles while descending ramps. Clinical relevance The findings suggest that K-Level-2 unilateral transtibial amputees benefit from K3 dynamic response prosthetic feet with J-shaped ankle. These results support the prescription of K3 feet for K-Level-2 amputees who frequently negotiate ramps.

AB - Background: Comparative effectiveness of prosthetic feet during ramp ambulation in unilateral transtibial amputees, who function at different Medicare Functional Classification Levels, has not been published. Objective: To determine differences in symmetry in external work between four categories of prosthetic feet in K-Level-2 and K-Level-3 unilateral transtibial amputees during ramp ascent and descent. Study design: Randomized repeated-measures trial. Methods: Ten subjects completed six testing sessions during which symmetry in external work was calculated using F-scan in-sole sensors. Between testing sessions 1 and 2, subjects received standardized functional prosthetic training. In Sessions 3-6, subjects tested four feet - solid ankle cushion heel, stationary attachment flexible endoskeleton, Talux (categories K1, K2, and K3, respectively), and Proprio-Foot (microprocessor ankle) - using a study socket and had a 10- to 14-day accommodation period with each foot. Results: During ramp descent, K-Level-2 subjects demonstrated higher symmetry in external work values with Talux and Proprio-Foot compared to the solid ankle cushion heel foot. K-Level-3 subjects also had higher symmetry in external work values with the Talux foot than the solid ankle cushion heel foot. Ramp ascent symmetry in external work values were not significantly different between feet. Conclusions: Prosthetic foot category appears to influence symmetry in external work more during decline walking than incline walking. K-Level-2 unilateral transtibial amputees achieve greater symmetry from K3 dynamic response prosthetic feet with J-shaped ankle and microprocessor ankles while descending ramps. Clinical relevance The findings suggest that K-Level-2 unilateral transtibial amputees benefit from K3 dynamic response prosthetic feet with J-shaped ankle. These results support the prescription of K3 feet for K-Level-2 amputees who frequently negotiate ramps.

KW - biomechanics

KW - Biomechanics of prosthetic/orthotic devices

KW - gait

KW - gait analysis

KW - physiotherapy

KW - prosthetic feet

KW - prosthetics

KW - rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955268417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955268417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0309364614536762

DO - 10.1177/0309364614536762

M3 - Article

C2 - 24925671

AN - SCOPUS:84955268417

VL - 39

SP - 380

EP - 389

JO - Prosthetics and Orthotics International

JF - Prosthetics and Orthotics International

SN - 0309-3646

IS - 5

ER -