Comparison of Fluorescence-Based Semi-automated Genotyping of Multiple Microsatellite Loci with Autoradiographic Techniques

Deborah A. Schwengel, Anne E. Jedlicka, Elizabeth J. Nanthakumar, James L. Weber, Roy C Levitt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

95 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The practical application of highly efficient fluorescence-based methods for the semi-automated genotyping of polymerase chain reaction-based microsatellite markers will depend on the development of robust protocols that provide accurate and reproducible data. In the present report we compare the accuracy of a fluorescence-based protocol with a benchmark radiolabeling method that depends on a known sequence ladder or amplified DNA from reference individuals for sizing by autoradiography. Three microsatellite markers, IGF1 (mfd 1), D4S174 (mfd 59), and D5S211 (mfd 154), with products overlapping in size were each labeled with a different fluorophore and run simultaneously with an internal size standard in a single electrophoretic lane. The size of each allele was compared for these markers by using both techniques for five larger CEPH families (884, 1331, 1332, 1333, and 1362). Of 462 possible alleles, four discrepancies (0.8%) were identified when the two approaches were compared. We conclude that the fluorescence-based protocol is at least as accurate as the standard radiolabeling technique since none of the sizing errors arose as a result of the fluorescence-based technique. We describe the adaptation of this fluorescence-based protocol to the simultaneous analysis of up to 24 microsatellite loci per electrophoretic lane. These highly accurate and efficient semi-automated techniques will be useful in high-resolution genomic analyses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)46-54
Number of pages9
JournalGenomics
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Microsatellite Repeats
Fluorescence
Alleles
Benchmarking
Autoradiography
Polymerase Chain Reaction
DNA

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics

Cite this

Comparison of Fluorescence-Based Semi-automated Genotyping of Multiple Microsatellite Loci with Autoradiographic Techniques. / Schwengel, Deborah A.; Jedlicka, Anne E.; Nanthakumar, Elizabeth J.; Weber, James L.; Levitt, Roy C.

In: Genomics, Vol. 22, No. 1, 01.07.1994, p. 46-54.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schwengel, Deborah A. ; Jedlicka, Anne E. ; Nanthakumar, Elizabeth J. ; Weber, James L. ; Levitt, Roy C. / Comparison of Fluorescence-Based Semi-automated Genotyping of Multiple Microsatellite Loci with Autoradiographic Techniques. In: Genomics. 1994 ; Vol. 22, No. 1. pp. 46-54.
@article{81c74cfdc63f472f87b3682a00df69af,
title = "Comparison of Fluorescence-Based Semi-automated Genotyping of Multiple Microsatellite Loci with Autoradiographic Techniques",
abstract = "The practical application of highly efficient fluorescence-based methods for the semi-automated genotyping of polymerase chain reaction-based microsatellite markers will depend on the development of robust protocols that provide accurate and reproducible data. In the present report we compare the accuracy of a fluorescence-based protocol with a benchmark radiolabeling method that depends on a known sequence ladder or amplified DNA from reference individuals for sizing by autoradiography. Three microsatellite markers, IGF1 (mfd 1), D4S174 (mfd 59), and D5S211 (mfd 154), with products overlapping in size were each labeled with a different fluorophore and run simultaneously with an internal size standard in a single electrophoretic lane. The size of each allele was compared for these markers by using both techniques for five larger CEPH families (884, 1331, 1332, 1333, and 1362). Of 462 possible alleles, four discrepancies (0.8{\%}) were identified when the two approaches were compared. We conclude that the fluorescence-based protocol is at least as accurate as the standard radiolabeling technique since none of the sizing errors arose as a result of the fluorescence-based technique. We describe the adaptation of this fluorescence-based protocol to the simultaneous analysis of up to 24 microsatellite loci per electrophoretic lane. These highly accurate and efficient semi-automated techniques will be useful in high-resolution genomic analyses.",
author = "Schwengel, {Deborah A.} and Jedlicka, {Anne E.} and Nanthakumar, {Elizabeth J.} and Weber, {James L.} and Levitt, {Roy C}",
year = "1994",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1006/geno.1994.1344",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "46--54",
journal = "Genomics",
issn = "0888-7543",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Fluorescence-Based Semi-automated Genotyping of Multiple Microsatellite Loci with Autoradiographic Techniques

AU - Schwengel, Deborah A.

AU - Jedlicka, Anne E.

AU - Nanthakumar, Elizabeth J.

AU - Weber, James L.

AU - Levitt, Roy C

PY - 1994/7/1

Y1 - 1994/7/1

N2 - The practical application of highly efficient fluorescence-based methods for the semi-automated genotyping of polymerase chain reaction-based microsatellite markers will depend on the development of robust protocols that provide accurate and reproducible data. In the present report we compare the accuracy of a fluorescence-based protocol with a benchmark radiolabeling method that depends on a known sequence ladder or amplified DNA from reference individuals for sizing by autoradiography. Three microsatellite markers, IGF1 (mfd 1), D4S174 (mfd 59), and D5S211 (mfd 154), with products overlapping in size were each labeled with a different fluorophore and run simultaneously with an internal size standard in a single electrophoretic lane. The size of each allele was compared for these markers by using both techniques for five larger CEPH families (884, 1331, 1332, 1333, and 1362). Of 462 possible alleles, four discrepancies (0.8%) were identified when the two approaches were compared. We conclude that the fluorescence-based protocol is at least as accurate as the standard radiolabeling technique since none of the sizing errors arose as a result of the fluorescence-based technique. We describe the adaptation of this fluorescence-based protocol to the simultaneous analysis of up to 24 microsatellite loci per electrophoretic lane. These highly accurate and efficient semi-automated techniques will be useful in high-resolution genomic analyses.

AB - The practical application of highly efficient fluorescence-based methods for the semi-automated genotyping of polymerase chain reaction-based microsatellite markers will depend on the development of robust protocols that provide accurate and reproducible data. In the present report we compare the accuracy of a fluorescence-based protocol with a benchmark radiolabeling method that depends on a known sequence ladder or amplified DNA from reference individuals for sizing by autoradiography. Three microsatellite markers, IGF1 (mfd 1), D4S174 (mfd 59), and D5S211 (mfd 154), with products overlapping in size were each labeled with a different fluorophore and run simultaneously with an internal size standard in a single electrophoretic lane. The size of each allele was compared for these markers by using both techniques for five larger CEPH families (884, 1331, 1332, 1333, and 1362). Of 462 possible alleles, four discrepancies (0.8%) were identified when the two approaches were compared. We conclude that the fluorescence-based protocol is at least as accurate as the standard radiolabeling technique since none of the sizing errors arose as a result of the fluorescence-based technique. We describe the adaptation of this fluorescence-based protocol to the simultaneous analysis of up to 24 microsatellite loci per electrophoretic lane. These highly accurate and efficient semi-automated techniques will be useful in high-resolution genomic analyses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027932334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027932334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/geno.1994.1344

DO - 10.1006/geno.1994.1344

M3 - Article

C2 - 7959791

AN - SCOPUS:0027932334

VL - 22

SP - 46

EP - 54

JO - Genomics

JF - Genomics

SN - 0888-7543

IS - 1

ER -