Comparison of different fan control strategies on a variable air volume systems through simulations and experiments

Gyujin Shim, Li Song, Gang Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Through a variable frequency drive (VFD), a variable air volume air handling system can significantly reduce supply fan power under partial load conditions. Typically, the VFD on a supply fan motor is modulated to maintain a supply air duct static pressure set point. The static pressure set point can be either constant or dynamically reset in response to different load conditions. In this paper, comprehensive mathematical models are established to describe the performance of a VFD-motor-fan system under three different static pressure control strategies: constant static pressure set point, static pressure reset by total airflow rate, and static pressure reset by highest zone demand. The total input power to the system, including the energy imparted into the air as well as the energy losses from the VFD, motor, and fan, are simulated and compared among the different static pressure reset strategies with different minimum airflow ratios. The simulation results show that more than 50% of electrical power savings can be realized by static pressure reset when the diversity of the zone thermal loads is moderate. In addition, although a lower minimum airflow ratio can result in more power savings, there were no significant power saving by reducing the minimum airflow ratio from 30% to 10% due to relatively high energy losses of the fan, motor and VFD at low load and speed conditions. Finally, experiments were carried out to demonstrate the performance comparison of three different control strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)212-222
Number of pages11
JournalBuilding and Environment
Volume72
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

fan
Fans
air
simulation
experiment
Air
airflow
supply
energy
Experiments
savings
performance comparison
Energy dissipation
Pressure control
Thermal load
comparison
electrical power
Ducts
demand
Mathematical models

Keywords

  • Fan law
  • Fan power
  • Fan speed control
  • Motor efficiency
  • Static pressure reset
  • VFD efficiency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Building and Construction

Cite this

Comparison of different fan control strategies on a variable air volume systems through simulations and experiments. / Shim, Gyujin; Song, Li; Wang, Gang.

In: Building and Environment, Vol. 72, 01.02.2014, p. 212-222.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{008a991046224a14bb519d2aa7641727,
title = "Comparison of different fan control strategies on a variable air volume systems through simulations and experiments",
abstract = "Through a variable frequency drive (VFD), a variable air volume air handling system can significantly reduce supply fan power under partial load conditions. Typically, the VFD on a supply fan motor is modulated to maintain a supply air duct static pressure set point. The static pressure set point can be either constant or dynamically reset in response to different load conditions. In this paper, comprehensive mathematical models are established to describe the performance of a VFD-motor-fan system under three different static pressure control strategies: constant static pressure set point, static pressure reset by total airflow rate, and static pressure reset by highest zone demand. The total input power to the system, including the energy imparted into the air as well as the energy losses from the VFD, motor, and fan, are simulated and compared among the different static pressure reset strategies with different minimum airflow ratios. The simulation results show that more than 50{\%} of electrical power savings can be realized by static pressure reset when the diversity of the zone thermal loads is moderate. In addition, although a lower minimum airflow ratio can result in more power savings, there were no significant power saving by reducing the minimum airflow ratio from 30{\%} to 10{\%} due to relatively high energy losses of the fan, motor and VFD at low load and speed conditions. Finally, experiments were carried out to demonstrate the performance comparison of three different control strategies.",
keywords = "Fan law, Fan power, Fan speed control, Motor efficiency, Static pressure reset, VFD efficiency",
author = "Gyujin Shim and Li Song and Gang Wang",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.11.003",
language = "English",
volume = "72",
pages = "212--222",
journal = "Building and Environment",
issn = "0360-1323",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of different fan control strategies on a variable air volume systems through simulations and experiments

AU - Shim, Gyujin

AU - Song, Li

AU - Wang, Gang

PY - 2014/2/1

Y1 - 2014/2/1

N2 - Through a variable frequency drive (VFD), a variable air volume air handling system can significantly reduce supply fan power under partial load conditions. Typically, the VFD on a supply fan motor is modulated to maintain a supply air duct static pressure set point. The static pressure set point can be either constant or dynamically reset in response to different load conditions. In this paper, comprehensive mathematical models are established to describe the performance of a VFD-motor-fan system under three different static pressure control strategies: constant static pressure set point, static pressure reset by total airflow rate, and static pressure reset by highest zone demand. The total input power to the system, including the energy imparted into the air as well as the energy losses from the VFD, motor, and fan, are simulated and compared among the different static pressure reset strategies with different minimum airflow ratios. The simulation results show that more than 50% of electrical power savings can be realized by static pressure reset when the diversity of the zone thermal loads is moderate. In addition, although a lower minimum airflow ratio can result in more power savings, there were no significant power saving by reducing the minimum airflow ratio from 30% to 10% due to relatively high energy losses of the fan, motor and VFD at low load and speed conditions. Finally, experiments were carried out to demonstrate the performance comparison of three different control strategies.

AB - Through a variable frequency drive (VFD), a variable air volume air handling system can significantly reduce supply fan power under partial load conditions. Typically, the VFD on a supply fan motor is modulated to maintain a supply air duct static pressure set point. The static pressure set point can be either constant or dynamically reset in response to different load conditions. In this paper, comprehensive mathematical models are established to describe the performance of a VFD-motor-fan system under three different static pressure control strategies: constant static pressure set point, static pressure reset by total airflow rate, and static pressure reset by highest zone demand. The total input power to the system, including the energy imparted into the air as well as the energy losses from the VFD, motor, and fan, are simulated and compared among the different static pressure reset strategies with different minimum airflow ratios. The simulation results show that more than 50% of electrical power savings can be realized by static pressure reset when the diversity of the zone thermal loads is moderate. In addition, although a lower minimum airflow ratio can result in more power savings, there were no significant power saving by reducing the minimum airflow ratio from 30% to 10% due to relatively high energy losses of the fan, motor and VFD at low load and speed conditions. Finally, experiments were carried out to demonstrate the performance comparison of three different control strategies.

KW - Fan law

KW - Fan power

KW - Fan speed control

KW - Motor efficiency

KW - Static pressure reset

KW - VFD efficiency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890250676&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890250676&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.11.003

DO - 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.11.003

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 212

EP - 222

JO - Building and Environment

JF - Building and Environment

SN - 0360-1323

ER -